TPACK AND BUSINESS EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF LITERATURE (2008-2017)

Autores

  • Camilla Soueneta Nascimento Nganga Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
  • Vitor Hideo Nasu Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-6634
  • Robson Queiroz Pereira Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
  • Daniel Ramos Nogueira Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34629/ric.v14i0.e-020001

Palavras-chave:

TPACK, Business education, Review of literature, Faculty, Technology.

Resumo

The objective was to conduct a literature review on TPACK in Business Education (BE) from 2008 to 2017 to provide a general scenario of the scientific studies on this topic. We used the search tools of six academic databases to identify studies that included TPACK and business terms. This search yielded a total of 389 studies, which only four were considered as belonging to the TPACK-BE area. Our results suggested that TPACK has not been much explored in BE and deserves more attention. The analysis of core aspects supported that TPACK can help to design courses, although teachers who are not familiar with technology and content would probably face stronger challenges in implementing it. The analysis of circumstantial aspects of the study indicated that they were TPACK-BE studies developed in different countries and published in technology-education thematic journals. Also, most of the studies employed surveys as a method.

Biografia do Autor

Camilla Soueneta Nascimento Nganga, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

Professora Adjunta da Faculdade de Ciências Contábeis da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

Vitor Hideo Nasu, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutorando do Programa de Pós-graduação em Controladoria e Contabilidade da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo.

Robson Queiroz Pereira, Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Doutorando em Controladoria e Contabilidade pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Daniel Ramos Nogueira, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)

Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Ciências Contábeis da Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)

Referências

ANDERSON, J. E.; SCHWAGER, P. H.; KERNS, R. L. The drivers for acceptance of tablet PCs by faculty in a college of business. Journal of Information Systems Education, v. 17, n. 4, 429–440, 2006. Retrieved from http://paulschwager.com/pubs/2006JISE.pdf

APOSTOLOU, B.; BLUE, M. A.; Daigle, R. J. Student perceptions about computerized testing in introductory managerial accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 27, n. 2, 59–70, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.02.003

ARCHAMBAULT, L. M.; BARNETT, J. H. Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, v. 55, n. 4, 1656–1662, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009

AY, Y.; KARADAĞ, E.; ACAT, M. B. The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-practical (TPACK-Practical) model: Examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Computers & Education, v. 88, 97–108, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017

BOSCHMAN, F.; MCKENNEY, S.; VOOGT, J. Exploring teachers’ use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities. Computers & Education, v. 82, 250–262, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.010

CHAI, C. S.; KOH, J. H. L.; TSAI, C. C. A review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, v. 16, n. 2, 31–51, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.2.31%0D

CHUI, L.; MARTIN, K.; PIKE, B. A quasi-experimental assessment of interactive student response systems on student confidence, effort, and course performance. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 31, n. 1, 17–30, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2013.01.002

ERTMER, P. A.; OTTENBREIT-LEFTWICH, A. T.; SADIK, O.; SENDURUR, E.; SENDURUR, P. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, v. 59, n. 2, 423–435, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

ESCUETA, M.; QUAN, V.; NICKOW, A. J.; OREOPOULOS, P. Education technology: An evidence-based review. NBER Working Paper Series, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w23744

FREEMAN, M.; HANCOCK, P. Milking MOOCs: Towards the Right Blend in Accounting Education. In E. Evans, R. Burritt, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Academic Leadership series - The Virtual University: Impact on Australian Accounting and Business Education (pp. 86–100). Sydney: Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia and Centre for Accounting, Governance and Sustainability of University of South Australia, 2013.

GEORGE, A.; SANDERS, M. Evaluating the potential of teacher-designed technology-based tasks for meaningful learning: Identifying needs for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, v. 22, n. 6, 2871–2895, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9609-y

HOWELL, D. D.; TSENG, D. C.; COLORADO-RESA, J. T. Fast Assessments with Digital Tools Using Multiple-Choice Questions. College Teaching, v. 65, n. 3, 145–147, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1291489

JANVRIN, D. J.; WATSON, M. W. “Big Data”: A new twist to accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 38, 3–8, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.12.009

JEN, T.-H.; YEH, Y.-F.; HSU, Y.-S.; WU, H.-K.; CHEN, K.-M. Science teachers’ TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Computers & Education, v. 95, 45–62, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009

JOHNSON, B. G.; PHILLIPS, F.; CHASE, L. G. An intelligent tutoring system for the accounting cycle: Enhancing textbook homework with artificial intelligence. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 27, n. 1, 30–39, 2009. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0748575109000074

KACIUBA, G. An instructional assignment for student engagement in auditing class: Student movies and the AICPA Core Competency Framework. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 30, n. 2, 248–266, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2012.08.003

KOEHLER, M. J.; MISHRA, P. Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, v. 21, n. 3, 94–102, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1.1.130.7937

KOEHLER, M. J.; MISHRA, P. Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.

KOEHLER, M. J.; MISHRA, P. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, v.9, 60–70, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledge/

KOEHLER, M. J.; MISHRA, P.; HERSHEY, K.; PERUSKI, L. With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Teacher Education, v. 12, n. 1, 25–55, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/INDEX.CFM?fuseaction=Reader.ViewFullText&paper_id=14636

KOEHLER, M. J.; MISHRA, P.; & YAHYA, K. Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, v. 49, n. 3, 740–762, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012

KOPCHA, T. J.; OTTENBREIT-LEFTWICH, A.; JUNG, J.; BASER, D. Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures. Computers & Education, v. 78, 87–96, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.003

LIU, X.; BURNS, A. C. Designing a marketing analytics course for the digital age. Marketing Education Review, v. 28, n. 1, 1–13, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2017.1421049

MISHRA, P.; KOEHLER, M. J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, v., 108, n. 6, 1017–1054, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

MUELLER, J.; WOOD, E.; WILLOUGHBY, T.; ROSS, C.; SPECHT, J. Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, v. 51, n. 4, 1523–1537, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003

OVERBAY, A.; PATTERSON, A. S.; VASU, E. S.; GRABLE, L. L. Constructivism and technology use: Findings from the IMPACTing leadership project. Educational Media International, v. 47, n. 2, 103–120, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2010.492675

PINCUS, K. V.; STOUT, D. E.; SORENSEN, J. E.; STOCKS, K. D.; LAWSON, R. A. Forces for change in higher education and implications for the accounting academy. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 40, 1–18, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.06.001

RAMAN, A. TPACK Confidence of Pre-Service Teachers in Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, v. 5, n. 22, 167–175, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n22p167

REYES, V. C.; READING, C.; DOYLE, H.; GREGORY, S. Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, v. 115, 1–19, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.009

RIENTIES, B.; TOWNSEND, D. Integrating ICT in BE: Using TPACK to reflect on two course redesigns. In Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice (pp. 141–156), 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2

SHULMAN, L. S. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, v. 15, n. 2, 4–14, 1986. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

SHULMAN, L. S. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, v. 57, n. 1, 1–21, 1987.

SLEDGIANOWSKI, D.; GOMAA, M.; TAN, C. Toward integration of Big Data, technology and information systems competencies into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 38, 81–93, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.12.008

SPRAGUE, E. W.; DAHL, D. W. Learning to click: An evaluation of the personal response system clicker technology in introductory marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education, v. 32, n. 1, 93–103, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475309344806

SWAN, K.; HOFER, M. In Search of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, v. 44, n. 1, 75–98, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782580

TAI, H.-C.; PAN, M.-Y.; LEE, B.-O. Applying Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students. Nurse Education Today, v. 35, n. 6, 782–788, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.016

THOMPSON, A. D.; MISHRA, P. Editors’ remarks. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, v. 24, n. 2, 38–64, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2007.10784583

TIAN, T.; ZOU, N.; JIANG, J.; XU, X. Application of practical curriculum for college specialty of economic management under TPACK framework: Taking “enterprise operation and decision simulation system” curriculum as an example. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, v. 12, n. 7, 124–135, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i07.7223

TODOROVA, N.; MILLS, A. M. Using online learning systems to improve student performance: Leveraging prior knowledge. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, v. 7, n. 2, 21–34, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2011040103

VERLOOP, N.; DRIEL, J. V.; MEIJER, P. Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 35, 441-461, 2001.

VOOGT, J.; FISSER, P.; PAREJA ROBLIN, N.; TONDEUR, J.; VAN BRAAK, J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 29, n. 2, 109–121, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

WATTY, K.; MCKAY, J.; NGO, L. Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, v. 36, 1–15, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.00

Downloads

Publicado

31.12.2020

Edição

v. 14 (2020): Publicação Contínua

Seção

Artigos

Licença

As publicações são cobertas pelos seguintes termos:

  • Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  • Responsabilidade dos artigos e resenhas cabe aos autores.
  • Nenhum estágio de publicação, avaliação ou submissão envolve transações financeiras.