Populismo em palavras: inteligência artificial e análise de discursos presidenciais no Brasil (2003–2022)
Keywords:
Natural Language Processing, Data Science, PopulismAbstract
This study focuses on the development of NLP tools for text analysis. Using populism as a case study, the research evaluates the effectiveness of classical models, deep learning, and generative AI (Gemini) in classifying Brazilian presidential speeches from 2003 to 2022. The results show that while traditional models have limited performance, Gemini proves to be a superior and effective screening tool. The analysis of its "errors" reveals the nuances of populist rhetoric, such as Lula's conciliatory populism and Bolsonaro's implicit performance, which are not captured by minimalist definitions. The study concludes that the best approach for political discourse analysis combines the scale of computational tools with the depth of human qualitative analysis, highlighting the value of hybrid methods in data science.
References
Bonokowski, Bart, Luo, Yuchen & Stuhler, Oscar. (2022) Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and Authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential Campaigns (1952–2020) with Neural Language Models. Sociological Methods & Research.
DAI, Yaoyao. (2019). Measuring Populism in Context: A Supervised Approach with Word Embedding Models.
Di Cocco, Jessica, Monechi, Bernardo. 2021. How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning. Political Analysis.
Foa, Roberto Stefan; Mounk, Yascha. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of democracy, v. 27, n. 3, p. 5-17.
Finchelstein, Federico. (2019). Do fascismo ao populismo na história. São Paulo: Almedina.
Hawkins, Kirk & Kaltwasser, Rovira C. (2017), “The Ideational Approach to Populism”. Latin American Research Review, 52, 4:513-528.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, & Sidney Verba. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lynch, Christian; Cassimiro, Paulo Henrique. (2022). O populismo reacionário. São Paulo: Editora Contracorrente.
Moffit, Benjamin.(2015). “How to Perform Crisis: a Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism”. Government and Opposition, vol. 50, n. 2, 189-217.
Mudde, Cas. (2017). The Populist Radical Right: A Fourth Wave of Deconsolidation? American Political Science Review, v. 111, n. 4, p. 699–717.
Nunes, Felipe & Traumann, Thomas. (2023). Biografia do Abismo: Como a polarização divide famílias, desafia empresas e compromete o futuro do Brasil. HarperCollins Brasil.
Raveau, M. P., Fuentes-Bravo, C., Ángel-Fernández, Miguel, Coyoumdjian, J. P., del Solar, María José. (2024). “It's not the what but (also) the how”: characterizing left-wing populism in political texts. Frontiers in Political Science.
Ricci, M. (2021), Izumi, Maurício, Moreira, Davi. (2021). Populismo presidencial no Brasil (1989-2018): um estudo de caso sobre os governos Collor, FHC, Lula e Dilma. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 36, n. 107.
Schwarzbözl, Tobias & Fatke, Matthias. (2017). Measuring Populism in Social Media Data.
Sim, Yanchuan, Brice D. L. Acree, Justin H. Gross & Noah A. Smith. (2013). Measuring ideological proportions in political speeches. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2013. p. 91-101.
Tamaki, Eduardo Ryo; Fuks, Mario. (2020). Populism in Brazil’s 2018 general elections: An analysis of Bolsonaro’s campaign speeches. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, p. 103-127, 2020.
Urbinati, Nadia. (2019). Me The People. How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press.
van der Veen, Olaf, Dzebo, Semir, Littvay, Levi, Hawkins, Kirk, Dar, Oren. (2024). Classifying populist language in American presidential and governor speeches using automatic text analysis.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Isabela do Canto, Antonio Flávio de Barros Nipo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the Annals of Data Analysis retain
the copyright of their work and agree to license it under a Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.