Consuming kids: testing a dichotomous scale for measuring children’s material values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2024.261690Keywords:
materialism, dichotomous scale, material values scale, child consumersAbstract
This study aims to test a dichotomous scale for measuring children’s material values. Research into childhood consumer behaviour has taken a keen interest into the materialism values of children. Studies have sought to understand how materialism develops in children, the material values that children hold and the effects of materialism on children’s well-being. Other studies have sought to investigate the ways in which childhood materialism can be measured. Many of the studies investing children’s materialism have adopted the Material Values Scale for children (MVS-c), which is in a Likert scale format. However, studies on child consumers have shown that younger children struggle to express their attitudes using Likert type questions. This research examines the material values of tween consumers using an adapted Material Values Scale. The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of a dichotomised version of the MVS-c. The dichotomised scale was generated by collapsing the four response categories into a binary response scale. This methodological study uses a 12-item, yes/no response instrument to obtain data from 192 school children. The data was subjected to factor analysis, Kuder-Richardson (KR) 20, item total correlation and structural equation modelling. Factor loadings for the items varied between 0.24 and 0.69, with an acceptable KR-20 value of 0.708 for the scale. While the study confirmed the second-order material values structure, the weak factor loadings, compared to those obtained using Likert scales, suggest that dichotomous questions are not the most reliable for measuring children’s material values. The findings of this study have implications for research with children.
References
Allsop, D. B., Wang, C. Y., Dew, J. P., Holmes, E. K., Hill, E. J., & Leavitt, C. E. (2021). Daddy, mommy, and money: The association between parental materialism on parent-child relationship quality. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 42, 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-020-09705-9
Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890, (1-5), 012163. 1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
Alwin, D. F., Baumgartner, E. M., & Beattie, B. A. (2018). Number of response categories and reliability in attitude measurement. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 6(2), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx025
Anselmi, P., Colledani, D., & Robusto, E. (2019). A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714
Baker, A., & Chan, K. (2020). The effects of life events on the development of materialism and compulsive consumption: A life course study in the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 30(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2019.1613904
Behzadnia, A., & Mehrani Rad, M. (2020). Young Children’s Activity Involvement and Responses to Yes/No Questions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936- 019-09685-4
Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2003). The unintended effects of television advertising: A parent-child survey. Communication Research, 30(5), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203256361
Capik, C., & Gozum, S. (2015). Psychometric features of an assessment instrument with Likert and dichotomous response formats. Public Health Nursing, 32(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12156
Casabayo, M., Dávila, J. F., & Rayburn, S. W. (2020). Thou shalt not covet: Role of family religiosity in anti-consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(5), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12577
Chan, E. K. H. (2014). Binary Response. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_208
Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2007). Growing up in a material world: Age differences in materialism in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 480-493. https://doi.org/10.1086/518546
Chaplin, L. N., John, D. R., Rindfleisch, A., & Froh, J. J. (2019). The impact of gratitude on adolescent materialism and generosity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1497688
Chaplin, L. N., Shrum, L. J., & Lowrey, T. M. (2019). Children’s materialism and identity development. In Handbook of research on identity theory in marketing, 434-447. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117739.00042
Chaudhury, S. R., & Hyman, M. (2019). Children’s influence on consumption-related decisions in single-mother families: Research review and agenda. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1622178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1622178
Dittmar, H., & Isham, A. (2022). Materialistic value orientation and wellbeing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101337
Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G. J., Peracchio, L. A., & Bamossy, G. (2003). Understanding materialism among youth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_09
Górnik-Durose, M. E., & Pilch, I. (2016). The dual nature of materialism. How personality shapes materialistic value orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.008
Gross-Manos, D., Kosher, H., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2021). Research with children: Lessons learned from the international survey of children’s wellbeing. Child Indicators Research, 14(5), 2097-2118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09829-w
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage.
Hayes, J., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2017). Children’s answering of yes-no questions: A review of research including particular consideration of the relational evaluation procedure. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(1), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/bdb0000027
Jiang, J., Zhang, Y., Ke, Y., Hawk, S. T., & Qiu, H. (2015). Can’t buy me friendship? Peer rejection and adolescent materialism: Implicit self-esteem as a mediator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.001
Jeong, H. J., & Lee, W. C. (2016). The level of collapse we are allowed: Comparison of different response scales in Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 4(4), 00100. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2016.04.00100
Kühne, R., & Opree, S. J. (2019). Validating the short material values scale for children for use across the lifespan. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48, 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018- 9482-x
Lim, W. M., Phang, C. S. C., & Lim, A. L. (2020). The effects of possession and social inclusion defined materialism on consumer behavior toward economical versus luxury product categories, goods versus services product types, and individual versus group marketplace scenarios. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56(2020) 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102158.
Manchiraju, S. and Krizan, Z. (2015), “What’s materialism? Testing two dominant perspectives on materialism in the marketing literature”, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 10(2), 90-103, https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2015-0008
Maison, D., & Adamczyk, D. (2020). The relations between materialism, consumer decisions and advertising perception. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2526-2535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.320
Mellor, D., & Moore, K. A. (2014). The use of Likert scales with children. Journal Of Paediatric Psychology, 39(3), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst079
Nairn, A., & Opree, S. J. (2021). TV adverts, materialism, and children’s self-esteem: The role of socio-economic status. International Journal of Market Research, 63(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320970462
Opree, S. J., Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Development and validation of the Material Values Scale for children (MVS-c). Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 963-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.029.
Opree, S. J., & Kühne, R. (2016). Generation me in the spotlight: Linking reality TV to materialism, entitlement, and narcissism. Mass Communication and Society, 19(6), 800-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1199706
Opree, S. J., Petrova, S., & Rozendaal, E. (2020). Investigating the unintended effects of television advertising among children in former-Soviet Bulgaria. Journal of Children and Media, 14(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1644359
Ozgen, O., & Esiyok, E. (2020). Consumer ethics, materialism, and material satisfaction: A study on Turkish adolescent consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12541.
Rasmussen, E. E., Riggs, R. E., & Sauermilch, W. S. (2022). Kidfluencer exposure, materialism, and US tweens’ purchase of sponsored products. Journal of Children and Media, 16(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1910053
Richins, M. L. (2017). Materialism pathways: The processes that create and perpetuate materialism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.006
Richins, M. L., & Chaplin, L. N. (2021). Object attachment, transitory attachment, and materialism in childhood. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.020.
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304.
Roach, B., Goodwin, N., & Nelson, J. (2019). Consumption and the consumer society. Medford, MA: Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University. https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2019/10/Consumption_and_Consumer_Society. pdf
Russell, C. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2021). The cultivation of parent and child materialism: A parent-child dyadic study. Human Communication Research, 47(3), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab004
Senooane, B. (2023). The commercialisation of childhood? Materialism values of South African tweens. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 12(4), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i4.2457.
Senooane, B. C., & Phiri, M. A. (2020). Developing a socioecological model for tweens’ consumption of branded apparel. The Retail and Marketing Review, 16(1), 84-99. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1ea776808f.
Schor, J. B. (2004). Born to buy. New York: Scribner.
Shrum, L. J., Chaplin, L. N., & Lowrey, T. M. (2022). Psychological causes, correlates, and consequences of materialism. Consumer Psychology Review, 5(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1077.
Sigirci, O., Gegez, A. E., Aytimur, H., & Gegez, E. E. (2022). Children in marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1594-1639. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12819
Van der Meulen, H., Kühne, R., & Opree, S. J. (2018). Validating the Material Values Scale for Children (MVS-c) for use in early childhood. Child Indicators Research, 11, 1201-1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9456-9.
Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
Zawadzka, A. M., Lewandowska-Walter, A., Borchet, J., & Iwanowska, M. (2022). Risk factors for materialistic attitudes and values of teenagers–role of parents and peers. Journal of Family Studies, 31, 1427-1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2060120.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CBR - Consumer Behavior Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Statement
- The authors authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
- The opinions and ideas expressed in articles are the authors' sole responsibility.
- The authors guarantee that the article is not the result of plagiarism. Failure to do so may result in penalties for the situation.
- Editors can adjust the text and formatting to fit the article according to the journal's publication standards.
- The articles published are the property of CBR and are protected by copyright. However, authors can disclose and make their articles available for free.
