Idioma
Non-pharmacological methods for pain relief in newborns: an integrative literature review
Non-pharmacological methods for pain relief in newborns: an integrative literature review
Métodos não farmacológicos para o alívio da dor no recém-nascido: revisão integrativa da literatura
ABSTRACT
Objective: to synthesize knowledge about the use of non-pharmacological methods to relieve pain in newborns. Method: this is an integrative literature review, carried out in the Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Nursing Database and Spanish Bibliographic Index in Health Sciences, via the Virtual Health Library, MEDLINE (Literature International Health Sciences), via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Results: fifty-six articles were included, the majority of which were developed in Turkey between 1995 and 2022. Twenty non-pharmacological methods used to manage pain in newborns undergoing painful procedures were highlighted, which were applied alone or in combination, standing out in terms of effect or effectiveness are sweet solutions and breastfeeding. Conclusion: most of the methods identified were able to reduce newborn pain and crying during and after painful procedures.
Descriptors: Newborn; Methods; Pain Management; Cry; Evidence-Based Clinical Practice.
RESUMO
Objetivo: mapear a literatura a respeito da produção de tecnologias educacionais voltadas aos professores da educação infantil, sobre o manejo de acidente com pré-escolares. Método: protocolo de revisão de escopo conduzida a partir da metodologia do Joanna Briggs Institute. Os achados serão reportados utilizando a extensão do checklist Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. O protocolo está na Open Science Framework. A questão norteadora foi elaborada com base no mnemônico PCC: População, Conceito e Contexto. Foram utilizadas como bases para a pesquisa: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL-EBSCO e Google Scholar. As referências dos estudos primários serão consultadas como estratégias adicionais. Serão considerados elegíveis os estudos que estejam dentro dos critérios estabelecidos, e que respondam à pergunta de pesquisa. A seleção ocorrerá de maneira independente por dois revisores, utilizando os programas EndNote® e Rayyan®, obedecendo os critérios de elegibilidade, e as divergências serão discutidas por um terceiro revisor. Para a síntese e a extração dos dados será considerado um formulário elaborado pelos autores. Os resultados serão apresentados por meio de quadro, fluxograma e discussão narrativa.
Descritores: Professores Escolares; Tecnologias Educacionais; Primeiros Socorros; Educação em Saúde; Revisão de Escopo.
INTRODUCTION
Pain can be defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience related to or analogous to actual or potential tissue damage.1 When it occurs in the first 28 days of life, it is called neonatal pain.2 For a long time, the hypothesis remained that newborns (NBs) do not feel pain in the same way as older children and adults. Based on these beliefs, until the end of the 1980s, it was common to perform surgeries on this group of children without using adequate methods for pain relief.3
Currently, it appears that NBs not only feel pain, but also, due to their immature nervous system, are hypersensitive to painful stimuli.4 When pain is inadequately treated during the neonatal period, persistent effects may occur,5 such as the development of hypersensitivity to pain and altered neurodevelopment.6 For this reason, neonatal pain assessment and management should be encouraged to enable the development of individualized treatment plans.4
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods are options to reduce the negative impact of pain and agitation in NBs, with concerns emerging about the adverse effects of analgesia and sedatives.7 In this context, non-pharmacological pain management (proximal, distal and procedural) demonstrated effectiveness in reducing painful responses in NBs6 and the ability to reduce dosage or exclude the use of drugs.8
Numerous non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) have been studied and applied to avoid or reduce pain during procedures in children, highlighting distraction maneuvers, tactile stimulation, skin-to-skin contact (SSC), non-nutritive sucking (NNS), offering breast milk (BM), sweet solutions (25% glucose) and breastfeeding.4
Considering that acute pain management must be one of the priorities for healthcare professionals who care for childhood patients9 and who, constantly, new non-pharmacological interventions have been developed with the aim of avoiding or mitigating pain in NBs who are subjected to routine painful procedures (such as vaccine administration and heel prick tests) or those related to the need for hospitalization,10 the guiding research question emerged: what are the NPMs for pain relief in NBs?
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize knowledge about the use of NPM to relieve pain in NBs.
METHOD
This is an integrative literature review (ILR), whose methodological path was guided by five phases: problem identification/formulation; literature search/data collection; data assessment; analysis of the findings of the articles included in the review; and presentation and interpretation of results.11
In the first stage, the research question was formulated based on the PICo strategy, in which P corresponds to Participant (NB); I corresponds to the phenomenon of Interest (methods); and Co corresponds to Context of study (pain management). Therefore, the following guiding question was created: what are the NPMs for pain relief in NBs?
Subsequently, controlled and uncontrolled descriptors were established, selected after consulting the Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS) and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). These terms were crossed using the Boolean operators AND and OR (Chart 1).
Chart 1. Research question stratification following the PICo strategy. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2023
|
PICo strategy
|
||||
|
Description |
Acronym |
Components |
Descriptors |
Uncontrolled descriptors |
|
Participants |
P |
NB |
Recém-Nascido Infant, Newborn |
|
|
Phenomenon of interest |
I |
NPM |
Métodos Methods |
Non-Pharmacological Methods |
|
Context of study |
Co
|
Pain management
|
Manejo da Dor Pain Management |
|
Source: own elaboration.
Primary studies that address NPMs for pain relief in full-term NBs, published in English, Portuguese or Spanish, were included. Narrative literature review studies/traditional, systematic or integrative review, notes, editorials, reports, dissertations and theses, studies that included other age groups, in which it was not possible to establish the methods used only for the group of newborn children, were excluded. It is emphasized that no time frame was used to select the articles, as a broad approach was aimed.
Literature search took place between August 2022 and January 2023, simultaneously, by two researchers in databases accessed through the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) Journal Portal in an area with recognized Internet Protocol (IP). The databases researched were Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Nursing Database (BDENF) and Índice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud (IBECS), via Virtual Health Library (VHL), MEDLINE (International Literature in Health Sciences), via PubMed, in addition to Scopus and Web of Science (Chart 2).
Chart 2. Crossings of descriptors used by database in data search. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2023
|
Database |
Strategy |
|
LILACS/BDENF/IBECS - via VHL |
("Infant, Newborn") AND (methods) OR ("Non-pharmacological methods") AND ("Pain Management") |
|
MEDLINE - via PubMed |
(("Infant, Newborn") AND ((Methods) OR ("Non-pharmacological methods"))) AND ("Pain Management") |
|
Scopus |
(TITLE-ABS-KEY ("Infant, Newborn") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (methods) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ("Non-pharmacological methods") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ("Pain Management")) |
|
Web of Science |
"Infant, Newborn" (All Fields) and Methods (All Fields) or "Non-pharmacological methods" (All Fields) and "Pain Management" (All Fields) |
Source: own elaboration.
Initially, identified citations were imported into the EndNote basic Reference Manager, where duplicates were identified and removed. Soon after, articles were selected by reading titles and abstracts based on the inclusion criteria presented previously. In selected studies considered potentially eligible, they were read in full, which determined the final sample of this ILR, which followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Forthwith, data was collected using a form adapted from Ursi (2006), which was able to ensure that all relevant data was extracted. The following data was included: country/year; objectives; design/number of participants; interventions identified; effect; results.
To assess the extracted data, the JBI was followed, according to which the levels of evidence, according to study design, are: level I – evidence obtained from a systematic review containing only randomized controlled clinical trials; level II – evidence obtained from at least one randomized controlled clinical trial; level III. 1 – evidence obtained from well-designed controlled clinical trials, without randomization; level III. 2 – evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control studies, analytical studies, preferably from more than one center or research group; level III. 3 – evidence obtained from multiple time series, with or without intervention and dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments; level IV – opinion from respected authorities, based on clinical criteria and experience, descriptive studies or reports from expert committees.12
For the results produced, the data collection instruments were organized and then typed into Microsoft Excel version 2010 spreadsheet. The data obtained through analysis of the objectives, results and conclusion of each study were grouped by similarity and organized into thematic categories.13
RESULTS
A total of 2,722 potentially relevant articles for the review were identified (MEDLINE via PubMed n= 1,208; LILACS/BDENF/IBECS via VHL n = 27; Web of Science n = 808; Scopus n= 679), of which 124 were selected for full reading, leaving a total of 61 articles, which met the inclusion criteria (MEDLINE via PubMed n = 27; LILACS/BDENF/IBECS via VHL n = 2; Web of Science n = 1; Scopus n= 31) and who were selected to compose the sample, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Study selection flowchart according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020). Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2023
Source: own elaboration.
As for the country, the majority of studies were developed in Turkey (19), followed by the United States of America (USA) (7), China (5) and Brazil (4), between 1995 and 2024, with the largest number published in 2015 (9) and 2021 (9), followed by 2022 (7). With regard to the number of participants, significant variability was identified, with research involving between 29 and 671 NBs. In relation to study design, randomized clinical trials prevailed, with a larger quantity presenting level of evidence II (45), which demonstrates the suitability for assessing the effect and effectiveness of interventions (Chart 3).
There were 20 NPMs used to manage the pain of NBs undergoing painful procedures, which were applied alone or associated to compare the effect/efficacy between them and/or the control group (CG), namely: oral sweet solution administration (21), including sucrose (11), glucose (8) and dextrose (2), in different concentrations; breastfeeding (11); NNS (8); Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) and SSC (9); administration of milked BM (7); swaddling (7); olfactory stimulus (5); auditory stimulus (3); music therapy (2); mechanical vibration application (2); acupuncture (2) and its variation, acupressure (2); massage (2); containment (1); cuddling position (1); radiant heat (1); crochet octopus (1); Yakson method (1); and massage (1). Regarding the effect or effectiveness of interventions, it was found that the use of sweet solutions and breastfeeding stand out as non-pharmacological measures in reducing pain in NBs (Chart 3).
When analyzing the literature on the topic, original studies aim at an interest in diverse NPMs, which will be discussed below, through comparisons of different studies and their results. The first category includes articles that describe oral sweet solution administration. The second focused on breastfeeding as a possibility for intervention. The third discusses the use of NNS. The fourth refers to KMC and SSC. Finally, the fifth category refers to swaddling.
Chart 3. Characterization of selected studies in chronological order according to code, country, year, number of participants, level of evidence, objectives, study design, identified interventions, effect/results. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2023
|
C1 |
Country/ year/ number of p2/ LoE3 |
Objectives/ design |
Interventions identified |
Effect/results |
|
A114 |
England/ 1995/ 60 NBs/ II |
Assess the effects of different concentrations of sucrose on neonatal pain measures. Randomized, double-blind, controlled study |
Different concentrations of oral glucose. |
Significant reduction in overall crying time and heart rate (HR) after three minutes in NBs who received 50% sucrose, compared to controls. |
|
A215 |
United States of America/ 2002/ 84 NBs/ III.2 |
Examine the effectiveness of pacifiers and sugar alone and in combination in controlling pain in NBs. Experimental design |
NNS with and without sucrose. |
The sugar-coated pacifier group had significantly shorter crying durations than the water-moistened pacifier and CGs. |
|
A316
|
Turkey/ 2004/ 60 NBs/ II |
Assess the analgesic effect of spray glucose. Randomized, masked, placebo-controlled, crossover study |
30% glucose by syringe or oral spray. |
Pain scores were significantly lower in the 30% glucose groups administered by spray or syringe compared with the placebo group. |
|
A417 |
Turkey/2005/ 62 NBs/ II |
Compare the effect of foremilk, hindmilk and sterile water on reducing pain in NBs undergoing minor painful procedures. Randomized clinical trial |
Foremilk, hindmilk or sterile water. |
No statistically significant differences were found between the three. |
|
A518 |
Turkey/2007/ 102 NBs/ III.2 |
Examine and compare the analgesic effects of breastfeeding and sucrose solutions in reducing pain due to venipuncture in full-term NBs. Control case study |
Breastfeeding and use of oral sucrose solutions. |
Crying time was shorter for both sucrose and breastfeeding than in the CG. |
|
A619 |
South Korea/ 2008/ 99 NBs/ III.2 |
Test the effect of Yakson (traditional Korean touch method) and NNS in reducing pain in NBs undergoing the heel puncture procedure. Control case study |
Yakson and NNS method. |
Oxygen saturation levels in infants in the Yakson and NNS groups were significantly better than in infants in the CG. |
|
A720 |
Spain/2008/ 150 NBs/ III.2
|
Assess pain in healthy NBs who require blood testing for a heel puncture procedure and compare different pain management methods. Control case study |
Containment mechanisms, NNS and sucrose. |
In the CG, the mean score on the discomfort scale was 3.92, with moderate pain; the group that received NNS-placebo had a score of 2.1, mild pain; the group that received NNS-sucrose obtained 1.5 points, mild pain. |
|
A8 21 |
Italy/ 2008/ 101 NBs/ II |
Compare the effectiveness of breastfeeding versus orally administered sucrose solution in reducing pain response during plantar puncture blood collection. Open, randomized and controlled study |
Breastfeeding and oral sucrose solution. |
NBs’ median pain profile scores were lower in the breastfeeding group (3.0) than in the sucrose solution group (8.5). |
|
A9 22 |
Brazil/ 2009/ 640 NBs/ II |
Compare the efficacy of oral treatment with 25% dextrose and/or SSC for analgesia in full-term NBs during intramuscular injection of hepatitis B vaccine. Prospective, randomized, partially blind clinical trial |
25% oral dextrose and SSC. |
The use of oral treatment with 25% dextrose reduced procedural pain duration. SSC decreased pain and injection duration. The combination of the two analgesic measures was more effective than either measure alone. |
|
A1023 |
Taiwan/ 2010/ 105 NBs/ II |
Compare the effectiveness of NNS and glucose solution as pain relief interventions in infants undergoing venipuncture procedures. Randomized, controlled study |
NNS and glucose solution diluted with 25% oral sterile water. |
Both the NNS and glucose solution groups had significantly lower pain scores than the CG. |
|
A1124 |
Belgium/ 2010/ 304 NBs/ II |
Investigate which glucose concentration is most effective in reducing pain during venipuncture in NBs. Double-blind clinical trial |
Different concentrations of oral glucose. |
The mean pain score was significantly lower in the 30% glucose group (3.99) when compared with the placebo group (8.43). |
|
A1225 |
Turkey/ 2011/ 120 NBs/ II |
Compare the effects of using BM, sucrose and pacifiers to overcome pain during painful interventions for NBs on crying time and pain. Prospective, randomized and controlled study |
SNN, oral sucrose and BM. |
Sucrose followed by a pacifier was the most effective method to reduce NBs’ crying time. |
|
A13 26 |
Canada/ 2011/ 330 NBs/ II
|
Determine the relative efficacy of liposomal lidocaine, sucrose and their combination in reducing pain in full-term NBs. Double-blind, randomized, controlled, double-dummy study |
Before venipuncture for the NB screening test, infants received (1) 1 g of liposomal lidocaine cream topically, (2) 2 mL of 24% oral sucrose solution, or (3) sucrose and liposomal lidocaine. |
Sucrose was more effective than liposomal lidocaine in reducing pain during venipuncture in NBs. The addition of liposomal lidocaine to sucrose did not confer any additional benefit to sucrose alone. There was no evidence of harm from liposomal lidocaine or sucrose. |
|
A1427 |
United States of America/2013/ 30 NBs/II |
Test the hypothesis that SSC would reduce the pain of hepatitis B vaccine injection in full-term NBs. Randomized controlled trial |
SSC.
|
SSC infants cried less compared to CGs (23 versus 32 seconds during injection; 16 versus 72 seconds during recovery). |
|
A1528 |
Iran/2013/ 135 NBs/ III.2 |
Assess the effect of a familiar non-maternal scent on neonatal pain responses. Experimental clinical trial |
Olfactory stimulus of 0.64 g of vanillin diluted in 100 ml of 85% glycerol. |
Crying duration in the familiar smell group was significantly shorter than in the other two. |
|
A1629 |
Estonia/ 2014/ 69 NBs/ III.2 |
Assess the impact of vanilla on infants’ responses to a painful toe prick, including possible gender differences. Case control study |
Olfactory stimulation with vanilla aroma oil. |
Vanilla exposure had no significant effect on any of the behavioral measures. |
|
A1730 |
Turkey/ 2015/ 42 NBs/ II |
Investigate the effect of laser acupuncture on the Yintang point before heel puncture as a non-pharmacological intervention for pain treatment in NBs. Randomized clinical trial |
Laser acupuncture. |
The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the laser acupuncture group, however the mean crying time was longer and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score was lower compared to the oral sucrose group. |
|
A1831 |
Iran/2015/ 30 NBs/ III.2 |
Determine the effect of familiar auditory stimuli on pain induced by arterial blood sampling in full-term NBs. Case control study |
Familiar auditory stimuli in pain. |
The findings showed significant differences between the control and test groups, indicating the effect of mothers’ voice in reducing infants’ pain during arterial blood sampling. |
|
A1932 |
India/2015 180 NBs/ II |
Assess and compare the effectiveness of the combination of sucrose and NNS for analgesia in NBs undergoing heel puncture. Randomized control clinical trial |
30% oral sucrose and NNS. |
The median pain scale score was 3 in the group receiving sucrose administration associated with NNS compared to 7 in the group receiving sucrose alone, 9 in the group receiving NNS and 13 in the CG. |
|
A2033 |
China/2015/ 40 NBs/ II |
Investigate the effects of SSC on HR, transcutaneous oxygen saturation, facial expressions, physical activity and sound performance of infants. Randomized clinical trial |
SSC. |
In the seven periods during puncture, ten seconds after the start and ten seconds after the end, the neonatal HRs of the two groups changed. |
|
A2134 |
United States of America/2015/ 56 NBs/ II |
Assess the effect of oral sucrose on skin blood flow (SBF), perfusion units, measured by Laser Doppler Imager (LDI) in full-term NBs, and pain response (NIPS score) during heel puncture. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
24% oral sucrose sterile water. |
The mean SBF and median NIPS scores immediately after heel puncture were lower in NBs treated with sucrose. |
|
A2235 |
China/ 2015/ 671 NBs/ II |
Study the effects of NNS and swaddling on NBs’ behavioral and physiological parameters during shallow or deep heel puncture procedures. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial |
NNS and swaddling. |
A significant synergistic analgesic effect was observed between the swaddling and NNS groups in both the superficial (F = 5.952, p = 0.015) and deep (F = 7.452, p = 0.007) procedures. The NNS group showed the lowest pain score. |
|
A2336 |
Turkey/ 2015/ 60 NBs/ II |
Assess NBs’ pain perception during hepatitis B vaccination performed in the facilitated cuddling position and in the classic holding position, respectively. Randomized controlled experimental study |
Easy cuddling position and classic containment position. |
The mean pain scores of NBs vaccinated in the facilitated cuddling position (2.83 ± 1.18) were statistically and significantly lower than the scores of NBs vaccinated in the classic containment position (6.47 ± 1.07) (p < 0.05). |
|
A2437 |
United States of America/2015/ 29 NBs/ II |
Examine the analgesic effect of sucrose combined with radiant heat compared to sucrose taste alone during a painful procedure in healthy full-term NBs. Randomized and controlled study |
Oral sucrose combined with radiant heat and sucrose alone. |
The sucrose combined with heat group cried and grimaced for 50% less time after vaccination than the sucrose group alone (p < 0.05). |
|
A2538 |
China/2015/ 250 NBs/ II |
Test the effectiveness of breastfeeding, music therapy and the combination of breastfeeding and music therapy in relieving pain in healthy NBs during heel puncture. Randomized controlled trial |
Breastfeeding and music therapy. |
NBs in breastfeeding and combined breastfeeding + music therapy groups had significantly longer latency to the first cry, shorter duration of the first cry and lower mean pain scores during and one minute after heel puncture compared to the other two groups. |
|
A2639 |
Iran/ 2016/ 120 NBs/ III.1 |
Compare the analgesic effect of KMC, breastfeeding and swaddling on Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination in full-term NBs. Randomized study |
Breastfeeding and KMC. |
Breastfeeding was more effective than KMC and swaddling in reducing pain. |
|
A2740 |
United States of America/ 2016/ 56 NBs/ II |
Determine mechanical vibration safety and effectiveness for relieving heel puncture pain in infants. Parallel design randomized controlled study |
24% oral sucrose and mechanical vibration. |
Infants in the vibration group had significantly lower scores and more stable HR during heel puncture (p = 0.006, p = 0.037) and two minutes after heel puncture (p = 0.002, p = 0.016) than those in the no vibration group. |
|
A2841 |
Brazil/ 2016/ 11 nurses/ IV |
Describe nursing team practices in managing pain in NBs undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Descriptive, exploratory study with a qualitative approach |
Description by the nursing team of the non-pharmacological practices most used in the NICU. |
The nursing team considers the use of non-pharmacological practices to be effective, isolated or associated with pharmacological practices. NNS, 25% oral glucose and swaddling are considered safe, effective and adaptable analgesic practices for services. |
|
A29 42 |
South Korea/ 2016/ 56 NBs/ II |
Investigate the effectiveness of KMC as a pain relief intervention in infants in South Korea. Clinical trial |
KMC. |
The HR of infants with KMC was lower at one and two minutes after sampling than in the CG. The pain scores of infants with KMC were significantly lower during and after sampling. Crying duration of infants with KMC was around 10% of the duration of the CG. |
|
A3043 |
Turkey/ 2017/ 74 NBs/ II |
Determine the effect of swaddling on pain, vital signs and duration of crying during heel puncture in NBs. Randomized controlled study |
Swaddling. |
The mean pain of NBs swaddled during and after the procedure was lower than that of NBs not swaddled (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the crying duration of swaddled NBs was shorter than that of those not swaddled (p < 0.05). |
|
A3144 |
Pakistan/ 2017/ 252 NBs/ II |
Know neonatal pain, its score and the effectiveness of oral dextrose in managing neonatal pain. Randomized control study |
10% oral dextrose. |
The mean pain score with 10% dextrose and sterile water was 4.31 and 6.26, respectively, and the difference between the two was statistically significant. |
|
A3245 |
Italy/ 2017/ 80 NBs/ II |
Assess the differential effect of oral solutions (glucose, BM) provided alone or combined with the mother-NB relationship (safety, breastfeeding). Randomized clinical trial |
Bolus of 2 mL of 20% oral glucose solution and bolus of 2 mL of oral BM. |
Oral glucose alone or combined with maternal retention was associated with no cortical activation during heel puncture. Milked BM was associated with bilateral activation located in the somatosensory and motor cortices (p < 0.01). Breastfeeding was associated with extensive bilateral activation of the somatomotor, somatosensory and right parietal cortices (p < 0.01). |
|
A3346 |
India/ 2018/ 61 NBs/ II
|
Assess the effectiveness of KMC in relieving pain associated with vaccination in infants ≤14 weeks postoperatively. Randomized controlled study |
KMC. |
Post-vaccination pain and crying duration were significantly lower in infants who received KMC. |
|
A3447 |
United States of America/ 2018/ 33 NBs/ II |
Determine which intervention could decrease pain response in infants undergoing Ponseti casting for idiopathic clubfoot. Double-blind randomized controlled trial |
20% oral sucrose solution (S), water (W) or milk (M) in a bottle (breast or not). |
During casting, the mean NIPS score for milk, 0.91 (SD=1.26, p = 0.0005), and sucrose, 0.64 (SD=1.27, p < 0.0001), was significantly lower than for water, 2.27 (SD=2.03), but not different from each other (p = 0.33). After casting, sucrose’s NIPS score, 0.69 (SD=1.53), continued to be significantly lower than that of milk, 2.11 (SD=2.37, p = 0.0065). |
|
A3548 |
Brazil/ 2019/ 50 NBs/ IV |
Describe and quantify the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies used to relieve pain/stress in NBs during hospitalization in neonatal units. Quantitative, descriptive longitudinal study |
Description of 11,722 interventions for pain treatment and control. |
A total of 9,948 painful/stressful procedures were recorded, with a mean of 11.25 (± 6.3) per day per infant. A total of 11,722 interventions for pain management and relief were recorded, of which 11,495 (98.1%) were non-pharmacological strategies and 227 (1.9%) pharmacological strategies. |
|
A3649 |
Turkey/2019/ 139 NBs/ II
|
Determine the effects of foot massage and acupressure on pain during heel puncture in infants. Randomized clinical trial |
Acupressure and massage. |
There were statistically significant differences between acupressure, massage and CGs regarding pain reduction (4.30 ± 2.25, 3.95 ± 2.63, 6.04 ± 1.26, respectively). |
|
A3750 |
Pakistan/ 2019/ 60 NBs/ II |
Test the hypothesis that breastfeeding is a good analgesia in NBs undergoing BCG vaccination. Randomized clinical trial |
Breastfeeding. |
In the experimental group, the mean crying duration was 16.48 seconds, while in the CG it was 34.93 seconds. |
|
A3851 |
Italy/ 2019/ 56 NBs/ II |
Investigate, using the skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) pain monitor index, the effects of 24% sucrose solution on pain perception during capillary and arterial blood sampling. Prospective randomized controlled study |
24% oral sucrose. |
SCA showed that the measurement of pain spikes per second during and three minutes after the procedures was lower in the sucrose group than in the placebo group and that this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). |
|
A3952 |
Iran/ 2019/ 120 NBs/ II |
Assess the effectiveness of familiar olfactory stimulation with lavender aroma and glucose on blood collection pain in full-term infants. Randomized, single-blind clinical trial |
Olfactory stimulus with lavender scent and 30% edible glucose orally. |
Mean pain scores were 4.47 ± 1.81, 4.80 ± 1.92 and 5.97 ± 1.94 in the aromatherapy group, glucose group and CG, respectively (p < 0.001). |
|
A4053 |
Indonesia/2020/ 108 NBs/ II |
Compare the analgesic effects of sensory stimulation (SS) with sucrose (SSS), SS with BM (SSBM) and oral sucrose alone (24%) in NBs undergoing venipuncture. Randomized and controlled clinical trial |
SSS, SSBM, and sensory stimulation with oral sucrose alone (24%). |
SSBM and SSS were more effective than oral sucrose alone (24%) (p = 0.001). No difference was observed between SSBM and SSS (p = 0.669). |
|
A4154 |
Vietnan/ 2020/ 42 NBs/ II |
Assess the analgesic effect and safety of NNS in healthy full-term NBs during the heel prick test, using the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). Randomized controlled study |
NNS with silicone pacifier. |
Mean pain scores at 30, 60, 90 and 120 seconds after heel prick were significantly lower in the NNS group than in the CG (4.73 ± 2.78 versus 7.90 ± 1.52 (p = 0 .0002); 3.64 ± 3.06 versus 5.55 ± 2.95 (p = 0.052); 2.59 ± 3.08 versus 5.25 ± 3.51 (p = 0.011); and 2.05 ± 2.94 versus 4.90 ± 3.99 (p = 0.013), respectively). |
|
A4255 |
Turkey/ 2020/ 160 NBs/ II |
Experimentally determine the effects of three different methods (swaddling; swaddling and holding; swaddling, holding and breastfeeding) used during heel puncture on pain levels in healthy full-term NBs. Prospective, randomized and controlled study |
Swaddling and breastfeeding. |
The procedural pain scores in the CG were higher than in the swaddling group, swaddling + holding group and swaddling + holding + breastfeeding group. |
|
A4356 |
United States of America/ 2020/ 226 NBs/ III.1 |
Compare the analgesic effect of four non-pharmacological interventions (breastfeeding, oral sucrose, NNS and SSC) in full-term NBs between 24 and 48 hours of age undergoing heel puncture. Randomized study |
Breastfeeding, oral sucrose administration, NNS and SSC. |
The results indicate that all intervention groups showed a decrease in pain levels when compared to the CG (p <0.01). The oral sucrose group experienced a superior analgesic effect when compared with the SSC group (p < 0.01), but no difference was observed when compared with the breastfeeding group (p > 0.05) or the NNS group (p > 0.05). |
|
A4457 |
Turkey/2021/ 63 NBs/ III.2
|
Investigate the effect of acupressure applied to acupuncture points UB60 and K3 UB60 (hollow area between the edge of the external malleus and the calcaneus/Achilles tendon) and K3 (medial side of the foot, dorsum of medial malleolus and the hollow area between the edge of the Achilles tendon and the medial malleolus), in order to alleviate heel puncture pain in full-term NBs. Quasi-experimental study |
Acupressure. |
It was found that there was a significant difference between the groups regarding the mean scores on the Infant Neonatal Pain Scale during (p = 0.001) and after the procedure (p < 0.05), and the difference was found in favor of the acupressure group. |
|
A4558 |
Turkey/2021/ 140 NBs/ III.2
|
Investigate the effect of breastfeeding, kangaroo care and facilitating swaddling positioning on heel puncture pain in infants. Quasi-experimental study |
Breastfeeding, KMC and facilitated swaddling position. |
The facilitated folding position group cried less and experienced less pain during heel puncture than the other groups (p < 0.05). |
|
A4659 |
Spain/ 2021/ 106 NBs/ III.2 |
Assess neonatal pain during metabolic screening. Experimental study |
Oral serum glucose and breastfeeding. |
The pain produced was significantly greater in the no intervention group compared to the saline or breastfeeding groups (p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two analgesic procedures (p = 0.851). |
|
A4760 |
China/ 2021/ 116 NBs/ II |
Assess the effect of maternal voice on pain caused by venipuncture (including peripheral venipuncture and femoral venipuncture) in infants admitted to the NICU. Randomized controlled experimental study |
Auditory stimulus with recorded maternal voice. |
The study showed that pain scores, behavioral indicator scores and physiological indicator scores in the maternal voice group were significantly lower compared to those in the routine care group. |
|
A4861 |
Brazil/ 2021/ 52 NBs/ II |
Assess the effect of music, applied for ten and 15 minutes, combined with swaddling, on behavioral (facial action) and physiological (HR) responses to pain in full-term NBs before and during venipuncture for blood collection. Randomized, triple-blind clinical trial |
Swaddling and music therapy. |
The experimental group in which music was applied (15 minutes) plus swaddling showed a high absence of pain (p < 0.05) and a low mean HR (p < 0.0001) at baseline and during the procedure. |
|
A4962 |
Turkey/ 2021/ 128 NBs/ II |
Determine the effect on the level of pain and comfort of foot massages given by mothers to NBs before heel. Double-blind randomized controlled experimental study |
Oil massage by mothers. |
It was determined that mothers’ foot massage reduced the NBs’ pain level, increasing their comfort levels and decreasing their distress levels. |
|
A5063 |
China/ 2021/ 96 NBs/ II |
Explore the effect of breast milk sucking (BMS) on pain relief from neonatal heel blood sampling. Randomized clinical trial |
BMS. |
Crying time and bleeding time of NBs in the BMS group were significantly shorter than those in the CG (p < 0.05). The total pain scale score of the BMS group was lower than that of the CG (p < 0.05). |
|
A5164 |
Austria/ 2021/ 96 NBs/III.1
|
Investigate whether laser acupuncture is not inferior to oral sweet solutions in preventing pain. Clinical trial |
Laser acupuncture with 10 mW in LI4 bilaterally and administration of 30% oral glucose solution. |
Median pain scores were comparable in the acupuncture group and the glucose group (12 (10-14) versus 12 (9-14), p = 0.981). HR was significantly lower after the intervention (p = 0.048) and after heel puncture (p = 0.015) in the acupuncture group versus the glucose group. There was no difference in crying time between groups (p = 0.890). |
|
A52 65 |
Turkey/2021/ 64 mothers with NBs/ II
|
Assess the effectiveness of NPMs in neonatal pain management; explore anxiety-related outcomes; and examine the implementation of pain management training during the heel prick sampling procedure. Randomized clinical trial |
Expressed BM, swaddling, SSC, hold and smooth sounds. |
It demonstrated that when nurses recommended NPM for neonatal pain management, maternal participation in pain management increased significantly. |
|
A5366 |
Poland/ 2022/ 90 NBs/ II |
Assess the severity of pain felt by a NB during a screening heel puncture using the NIPS, in addition to measuring HR and comparing the effectiveness of NPM for pain management. Randomized clinical trial |
Breastfeeding, 20% oral glucose and NNS. |
No statistically significant differences were found between the degree of pain intensity and the intervention used to minimize pain (p = 0.24). |
|
A5467 |
Turkey/ 2022/ 90 NBs II |
Compare the effects of breastfeeding, BM odor and the sounds of mothers’ heartbeat on pain perceived during heel puncture in full-term NBs. Randomized experimental study |
Breastfeeding, olfactory stimulation with BM odor, auditory stimulation with the sounds of mothers’ heartbeat. |
During the procedure, NBs in the BM odor group presented high levels of pain and stress; NBs in mothers’ heart sound group presented mild pain and stress; and NBs in the breastfeeding group did not present pain and stress. |
|
A5568 |
India/ 2022/ 100 NBs/ II |
Assess the effectiveness of SSC versus swaddling in pain response to intramuscular injection of vitamin K at 30 minutes after birth in NBs. Randomized and controlled clinical trial |
SSC and swaddling. |
The pain scale score was comparable between SSC and swaddling before [1.78 (0.58) versus 1.96 (0.83), p = 0.21] and immediately after injection [4.82 (0.72) versus 5.08 (0.75), p = 0.08]. |
|
A5669 |
Turkey/ 2022/ 100 NBs/ II |
Determine the effect of using a crochet octopus to reduce acute pain and maintain optimal physiological measures that develop during procedural pain in infants. Parallel design randomized controlled study |
Crochet octopus. |
Infant saturation, touching the crochet octopus during and after the second minute of the procedure, was greater, and crying duration was shorter throughout the procedure, and the pain they felt due to the process was less than in the CG. |
|
A5770 |
Iran/2022/ 60 NBs/ III.1 |
Investigate the effect of the concomitant use of swaddling and sucrose taste on pain intensity during venous blood collection in infants. Clinical trial |
Concomitant application of swaddling and sucrose taste. |
The results showed a significant difference between the mean pain intensity in infants in the sucrose-swaddling group (4.53 ± 1.30) and the sucrose (7.73 ± 2.73), swaddling (9.86 ± 33, 33) and control (12.13 ± 2.06) during blood sampling (P <0.001). |
|
A5871 |
56 NBs/ II |
Assess the effect of applying vibration to control pain during heel puncture procedures in NBs. Randomized and controlled clinical trial |
Vibration. |
Pain scores were significantly lower at 15 to 20 seconds and five minutes after heel puncture procedures in the vibration group than in the CG (p < 0.05). |
|
A5972 |
Turkey/ 2022/120 NBs/ II |
Comparatively investigate the effectiveness of BM taste and/or smell in reducing pain responses in NBs undergoing a blood collection procedure. Prospective randomized controlled study |
Administration of olfactory stimulus with BM odor and administration of gustatory stimulus of BM. |
During and after the procedure, there were significant differences in pain levels, oxygen saturation and HR between groups (p = 0.000). The lowest pain score during the procedure was found in NBs to whom BM taste and smell were administered together. |
|
A60 73 |
Turkey/ 2023/ 96 NBs/ II |
Examine the effect of regional massage performed before blood sampling on pain and vital signs in full-term NBs. Randomized clinical trial |
Massage in the blood collection region. |
NBs in the experimental group had shorter crying times, lower levels of pain and HR and higher oxygen saturation than those in the CG. |
|
A61 74 |
Turkey/ 2024/ 50 NBs/ III.2
|
Determine the effect of breastfeeding on the behavioral pain and comfort scores of NBs during heel blood sampling. Pre-test/post-test experimental-control study |
Breastfeeding during heel blood sampling. |
Regional massage intervention reduced pain in full-term NBs. Breastfeeding is an important nursing intervention to reduce procedural pain in NBs. The breastfeeding method reduces pain and discomfort and increases NBs’ comfort during the heel blood collection process. |
1 Article code/ 2 Participants/3 Level of Evidence.
DISCUSSION
Oral sweet solution administration – sucrose, glucose and dextrose
The effect of different concentrations of sucrose on reducing pain in painful procedures, such as heel puncture and vaccination, was verified, with significant impacts on the duration of crying and HR after administration of the solution in healthy NBs, which demonstrates that the use of this solution can be safe and useful for minor procedures in these patients.16 Furthermore, increasing concentrations of sweet solution provides a significant tendency to reduce pain and crying time, with 30% glucose presenting lower pain scores when compared to 20% and 10%,24 and sucrose 50% compared to variations of 12.5% and 25% and 50%.14 The same efficacy results were found for 10% dextrose44 and 24% sucrose administered orally.51
When used in combination with other NPM, it appears that sweet solutions can obtain better results in reducing pain in NBs. A study that used sucrose combined with radiant heat compared to the taste of sucrose alone concluded that sucrose combined with heat group cried and grimaced for 50% less time after vaccination compared to the sucrose alone group, reflecting a greater ability to physiologically regulate the response to painful procedures.37
BM was also compared to 20% sucrose to ascertain its ability to mitigate pain in NBs, identifying that the mean pain score for the group that received BM was significantly higher than that of sucrose.47 In another study, SSS, SSBM and isolated oral sucrose (24%) were performed in infants undergoing venipuncture. It was demonstrated that SSBM and SSS were more effective than oral sucrose alone (24%) (p = 0.001), but no difference was observed between SSBM and SSS (p = 0.669).53 In fact, the analgesic effect of BM seems to be limited when offered expressed, without the act of breastfeeding, since a study that assessed the provision of 2 mL of foremilk, hindmilk or sterile water did not find statistically significant differences between the three groups in terms of crying time in NBs.17
The sucrose solution’s analgesic effect demonstrated is related to the rapid action that this glucose and fructose disaccharide has, although the literature does not present a consensus regarding the durability of its analgesic action.14,21 Furthermore, it is necessary to consider that, although sweet solutions, such as sucrose, are widely administered to hospitalized NBs for single painful procedures, the total volume during the entire stay in health services and associated adverse events are poorly known.75 Finally, it should be noted that there are contraindications for its use, such as high risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, food intolerance, esophageal atresia or tracheal-esophageal fistula or persistent pulmonary hypertension in the active phase.76
Breastfeeding
Breastfeeding as NPM for pain management in NBs is well documented in the scientific literature, especially with regard to minor painful procedures. This practice is capable of reducing crying duration, being significantly shorter when compared to routine care.50
A significant number of studies also used breastfeeding combined with other methods to compare their effect on reducing pain in NBs. In all studies, this NPM showed lower pain scores and duration of crying, confirming that breastfeeding has superior pain-reducing effects in NBs undergoing venipuncture,18 heel punctures21 and vaccination.50 However, although studies identify a relatively greater reduction in pain scores during breastfeeding compared to sweet solution administration (glucose or sucrose), no statistically significant differences were observed between the proposed interventions.59,18
In 2015, the World Health Organization released recommendations for national immunization programs on interventions to mitigate pain and fear at the time of vaccination; for children, the presence of caregivers and breastfeeding practice were recommended.77 Subsequently, in October 2021, the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH) issued a technical note (Technical Note 39/2021) that endorses breastfeeding as a non-pharmacological measure to reduce pain and discomfort in children during injectable vaccine application. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare professionals encourage nursing mothers to breastfeed children immediately before and during injectable vaccine administration,78 a conduct that can also be encouraged during other painful procedures.
Despite the endorsement of government organizations and researchers, nursing professionals’ and parents’ belief in the possibility of risks occurring, such as choking, coughing, vomiting, among others, may discourage breastfeeding while NPM to reduce neonatal pain during painful procedures.79 However, a systematic review of the Cochrane database, with the aim of determining the effect of breastfeeding on procedural pain in children up to one year of age, identified that none of the included studies reported complications related to breastfeeding during invasive procedures, thus suggesting that there is no risk of adverse effects such as those mentioned.80
Non-nutritive sucking
NNS was considered a safe and effective method of pain relief during NB procedures. A pacifier was used, in most studies, as an instrument to carry out the intervention. In all studies assessed, the mean pain, discomfort and crying scores were significantly lower in the NNS group than in the no pain management group.20,54
This NPM was also assessed comparatively to other interventions to mitigate pain in NBs, proving to be effective when compared to groups of children who underwent Yakson,19 and administration of glucose diluted with 25% sterile water.23 In only one study, the use of sucrose was more effective in reducing pain and crying time in NBs compared to NNS (pacifier).25
The combined application of NNS with other NPMs also showed the potential to increase pain reduction, as in the association of NNS and sucrose, compared to NNS and placebo, with significant differences being observed in both the pain scale score and crying time.20,32 When associated with breastfeeding and administration of 20% glucose orally, no statistically significant differences were found between the degree of pain intensity and the intervention used to minimize pain. Despite that, the results indicate that each of the non-pharmacological interventions (breastfeeding, oral glucose dosage and NNS) applied during painful procedures resulted in effective pain management in the majority of NBs included in the study.66
Kangaroo Mother Care (kangaroo position) and skin-to-skin contact
KMC, also known as SSC, is considered effective in relieving pain in NBs that occurs during various procedures performed in routine healthcare.81 It has been found that during painful procedures, SSC between mother and child can alleviate pain,33,46 reduce changes in HR, improve oxygen saturation in neonatal heel blood, and improve emotional communication between mother and child.33 It is also evident that NBs who receive SSC cry less compared to CGs, reaching a calm behavioral state sooner and tending to a faster decrease in HR.27
When applying SSC in hepatitis B vaccine intramuscular injection compared to 25% dextrose administration, it was demonstrated that SSC reduced pain and injection duration, but that the combination of the two analgesic measures was more effective than either measure separately for full-term NBs.22
KMC combines skin-to-skin body contact and hearing a familiar voice, which contributes to infants’ self-regulation. It is useful not only in reducing neonatal mortality, but also in reducing procedural pain, which occurs during routine procedures or during diagnostic examinations, regardless of whether the mother or father has performed the kangaroo position.81
Swaddling
NB swaddling, a technique also known as wrapping, is a NPM commonly used to reduce pain perception in infants for invasive procedures such as heel puncture, venipuncture and vaccination,68 and consists of swaddling or wrapping a child in a cloth.22 The mean pain scores of NBs swaddled during and after the procedure are lower than the scores of non-swaddled NBs, as is crying duration.43
However, when used in conjunction with other NPMs, it does not appear to have a superior effect. A study with the objective of comparing swaddling, KMC and breastfeeding in vaccination in NBs concluded that breastfeeding has a higher success rate in painless vaccination and shorter duration of crying compared to other methods.39 Following the same direction, SSC compared to swaddling has a lower pain score than at baseline, whereas it is significantly higher in swaddling, demonstrating that immediate SSC is more effective than swaddling as a pain management intervention.68
On the other hand, combined application with other NPMs demonstrates evidence of a significant synergistic analgesic effect, such as when applied in conjunction with NNS and oral sucrose in both superficial and deep puncture procedures. Although capable of reducing pain, NNS has been shown to exhibit lower pain scores than swaddling.35 There is also a significant difference between the mean pain intensity in NBs who receive sucrose-swaddling than sucrose or swaddling alone, and it is recommended that the combined swaddling-sucrose method be used in NBs as the best analgesic.70
Other NPMs, although studied in smaller numbers, are effective in managing NB pain, namely: olfactory stimulation using vanillin compared to a familiar smell, which demonstrated better effectiveness in reducing crying and oxygen consumption during arterial puncture;28 olfactory stimulus with the smell of lavender associated with 30% edible glucose, presenting itself as an easy and applicable nursing care to reduce blood collection pain in full-term NBs;52 auditory stimulus with mothers’ voice, whose findings showed the effect of mothers’ voice in reducing pain in infants;31 vibration, whose studies have demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during painful procedures than those in the no vibration group;40,71 massage, which reduced crying time, pain levels and HR, increasing oxygen saturation in NBs who received the intervention.73
On the other hand, methods with no or little effectiveness were also verified, such as olfactory stimulation with vanilla aroma oil, which had no impact on pain levels,29 BM odor, with NBs presenting high levels of pain and stress,67 and music therapy alone, which does not seem to increase the pain relief effect of breastfed NBs.38
CONCLUSION
Studies show that the use of NPM is a safe, low-cost and effective option for reducing pain and stress in NBs undergoing invasive procedures. Sweet solution administration and breastfeeding are the two most relevant methods, with the second standing out among all the methods assessed. Furthermore, the use of these combined interventions can provide even more positive results in reducing pain in NBs, presenting a synergistic effect when applied together.
The study is limited by the lack of research that assesses specificities in the application of methods, such as the ideal time for completion and the most favorable procedures for use. As an implication for Brazilian public health, it is envisioned that the results of this research can be synthesized and incorporated into the basic and continuing training of healthcare professionals, both in terms of the hospital context and in Primary Health Care, with the aim of making pain management in NBs more humanized and guided by scientific evidence.
CONTRIBUTIONS
Fernandes LSL, Brito MA and Rocha RC contributed to data analysis and interpretation and writing. Lopes TP contributed to data analysis and interpretation. Bezerra MAR contributed to conception, study planning, writing and critical review. Carneiro CT contributed to data analysis and interpretation, writing and critical review. Carvalho ILN and Moura MAP contributed to writing.
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
There were no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1.Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. PAIN [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 22] Aug 5; Articles in Press(9). Available from:
https://journals.lww.com/pain/Abstract/9000/The_revised_International_Association_for_the.98346.aspx
2.Fitri SYR, Nasution SK, Nurhidayah I, Maryam NNA. Massage therapy as a non-pharmacological analgesia for procedural pain in neonates: A scoping review. Complement Ther Med [Internet]. 2021[cited 2023 Feb 22];59:102735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102735
3.Goksan S, Hartley C, Emery F, Cockrill N, Poorun R, Moultrie F, et al. fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain. Elife [Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Feb 22];4: e06356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.06356
4.Perry M, Tan Z, Chen J, Weidig T, Xu W, Cong XS. Neonatal Pain: Perceptions and Current Practice. Crit Care Nurs Clin N [Internet]. 2018[cited 2023 Feb 22];30(4):549–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2018.07.013
- Maxwell LG, Fraga MV, Malavolta CP. Assessment of Pain in the Newborn. Clinics in Perinatology [Internet]. 2019[cited 2023 Feb 22];46(4):693–707. Available from: https://relaped.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Assesment-of-Pain-in-the-Newborn.pdf
6.Bucsea O, Pillai Riddell R. Non-pharmacological pain management in the neonatal intensive care unit: Managing neonatal pain without drugs. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine [Internet]. 2019[cited 2023 Feb 23];24(4):101017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2019.05.009
7.McPherson C, Miller SP, El-Dib M, Massaro AN, Inder TE. The influence of pain, agitation, and their management on the immature brain. Pediatric Research [Internet]. 2020[cited 2023 Feb 23];88(2):168–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0744-6
8.Pancekauskaitė G, Jankauskaitė L. Paediatric Pain Medicine: Pain Differences, Recognition and Coping Acute Procedural Pain in Paediatric Emergency Room. Medicina [Internet]. 2018[cited 2023 Feb 23];54(6):94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54060094
9.Shah P, Siu A. Considerations for neonatal and pediatric pain management. Am J Health Syst Pharm [Internet]. 2019[cited 2023 Feb 23]24;76(19):1511–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz166
10.DeSantana JM, Perissinotti DMN, Oliveira Junior JO de, Correia LMF, Oliveira CM de, Fonseca PRB da. Revised definition of pain revised after four decades. BrJP [Internet]. 2020;3(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20200191
11.Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 2005[cited 2023 Mar 12];52(5):546–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
12.Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2014: methodology for JBI umbrella reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute [Internet], 2014 [cited 2023 Mar12]. Available from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4367&context=smhpapers
13.Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Tradução de: Reto LA, Pinheiro A. São Paulo: 70 Edições; 2016.
14.Haouari N, Wood C, Griffiths G, Levene M. The analgesic effect of sucrose in full term infants: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ [Internet]. 1995[cited 2023 Mar 12];310(6993):1498–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1498
15.Greenberg CS. A sugar-coated pacifier reduces procedural pain in newborns. Pediatric nursing [Internet]. 2002[cited 2023 Mar 12]; 28(3):271. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12087649/#:~:text=Repeated%20measures%20analysis%20of%20variance,for%2015%20minutes%20after%20heelstick
16.Akçam M, Örmeci A. Oral hypertonic glucose spray: a practical alternative for analgesia in the newborn. Acta Paediatr [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2023 Mar 12];93(10):1330–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02932.x
17.Uyan ZS, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Cebeci D, Akman I. Effect of foremilk and hindmilk on simple procedural pain in newborns. Pediatr Int [Internet]. 2005[cited 2023 Mar 14];47(3):252–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200x.2005.02055.x
18.Efe E, Savaser S. The effect of two different methods used duringperipheral venous blood collection on pain reduction in neonates. Agri-Istanbul [Internet]. 2007[cited 2023 Mar 12];19(2):49. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17760245/
19.Im H, Kim E, Park E, Sung K, Oh W. Pain Reduction of Heel Stick in Neonates: Yakson Compared to Non-nutritive Sucking. J Trop Pediatr[Internet]. 2007[cited 2023 Mar 12];54(1):31–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmm083
20.Unceta-Barrenechea AA, Iturriaga GS, Aparicio ISR, Fernández DR. Analgesia en la toma sanguínea de talón en los recién nacidos. Anales de Pediatría [Internet]. 2008[cited 2023 Mar 12];69(6):544–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1695-4033(08)75237-8
21.Codipietro L, Ceccarelli M, Ponzone A. Breastfeeding or Oral Sucrose Solution in Term Neonates Receiving Heel Lance: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatr [Internet]. 2008[cited 2023 Mar 12];122(3):e716–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0221
22.Chermont AG, Falcão LFM, Silva EHLS, Balda RCX, Guinsburg R. Skin-to-Skin Contact and/or Oral 25% Dextrose for Procedural Pain Relief for Term Newborn Infants. Pediatr [Internet]. 2009[cited 2023 Mar 12];124(6):e1101–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0993
23.Liu MF, Lin KC, Chou YH, Lee TY. Using Non-nutritive Sucking and Oral Glucose Solution with Neonates to Relieve Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Nurs[Internet]. 2010[cited 2023 Apr 9];19(11-12):1604-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03014.x
24.Dilen B, Elseviers M. Oral Glucose Solution as Pain Relief in Newborns: Results of a Clinical Trial. Birth[Internet]. 2010[cited 2023 Apr 9];37(2):98–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2010.00389.x
25.Yilmaz F, Arikan D. The effects of various interventions to newborns on pain and duration of crying. J Clin Nurs [Internet]. 2010[cited 2023 Apr 9];20(7-8):1008–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03356.x
26.Taddio A, Xá V, Stephens D, Parvez E, Hogan ME, Kikuta A, et al. Effect of liposomal lidocaine and sucrose alone and in combination for venipuncture pain in newborns. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):e940-7. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2914
27.Kostandy R, Anderson GC, Good M. Skin-to-Skin Contact Diminishes Pain From Hepatitis B Vaccine Injection in Healthy Full-Term Neonates. Neonatal Netw[Internet]. 2013[cited 2023 Apr 9];32(4):274–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0832.32.4.274
28.Sadathosseini AS, Negarandeh R, Movahedi Z. The Effect of a Familiar Scent on the Behavioral and Physiological Pain Responses in Neonates. Pain Manag Nurs [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Apr 9];14(4):e196–e203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.003
29.Romantsik O, Porter RH, Varendi H. The effects of olfactory stimulation and gender differences on pain responses in full-term infants. Acta Paediatr [Internet]. 2014[cited 2023 Apr 9];103(11):1130–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12759
30.Abbasoglu A, Cabioglu MT, Tugcu AU, Yapakci E, Tekindal MA, Tarcan A. Laser acupuncture before heel lancing for pain management in healthy term newborns: a randomised controlled trial. Acupunct Med[Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Apr 9];33(6): 445-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2015-010765
31.Azarmnejad E, Sarhangi F, Javadi M, Rejeh N. The Effect of Mother’s Voice on Arterial Blood Sampling Induced Pain in Neonates Hospitalized in Neonate Intensive Care Unit. Glob J Health Sc [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Oct 19];7(6):198–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p198
32.Thakkar P, Arora K, Goyal K, Das RR, Javadekar B, Aiyer S, et al. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of combined sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for analgesia in newborns undergoing minor painful procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol [Internet]. 2015[cited 2019 Apr 21];36(1):67–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.122
33.Liu M, Zhao L, Li XF. Effect of skin contact between mother and child in pain relief of full-term newborns during heel blood collection. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Apr 9];42(3):304–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog1831.2015
34.Tutag Lehr V, Cortez J, Grever W, Cepeda E, Thomas R, Aranda JV. Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Sucrose Analgesia on Neonatal Skin Blood Flow and Pain Response During Heel Lance. Clin J Pain[Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Apr 9];31(5):451–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000126
35.Leng HY, Zheng XL, Zhang XH, He HY, Tu GF, Fu Q, et al. Combined non-pharmacological interventions for newborn pain relief in two degrees of pain procedures: A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pain[Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Apr 19];20(6):989–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.824
36.Kucukoglu S, Kurt S, Aytekin A. The effect of the facilitated tucking position in reducing vaccination-induced pain in newborns. Italian J Pediatr[Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Apr 19];41(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-015-0168-9
37.Gray L, Garza E, Zageris D, Heilman KJ, Porges SW. Sucrose and Warmth for Analgesia in Healthy Newborns: An RCT. Pediatr[Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Feb 16];135(3):e607–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1073
38.Zhu J, Hong-Gu H, Zhou X, Wei H, Gao Y, Ye B, et al. Pain relief effect of breast feeding and music therapy during heel lance for healthy-term neonates in China: A randomized controlled trial. Midwifery[Internet]. 2015[cited 2023 Apr 19];31(3):365–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.11.001
39.Fallah R, Naserzadeh N, Ferdosian F, Binesh F. Comparison of effect of kangaroo mother care, breastfeeding and swaddling on Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination pain score in healthy term neonates by a clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med[Internet]. 2016[cited 2023 Apr 20];30(10):1147–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1205030
40.McGinnis K, Murray E, Cherven B, McCracken C, Travers C. Effect of Vibration on Pain Response to Heel Lance. Adv Neonatal Care [Internet]. 2016[cited 2022 Dec 16];16(6):439–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/anc.0000000000000315
41.Jaciara Kegler J, Cardoso De Paula C, Neves E, Jantsch L, Anna E. Manejo da dor na utilização do cateter central de inserção periférica em neonatos. Esc Anna Nery [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 21];20(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20160099
42.Seo YS, Lee J, Ahn HY. Effects of Kangaroo Care on Neonatal Pain in South Korea. J Trop Pediatr. 2016 Jun;62(3):246-9. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmv102
43.Erkut Z, Yildiz S. The Effect of Swaddling on Pain, Vital Signs, and Crying Duration during Heel Lance in Newborns. Pain Manag Nur[Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Oct 18];18(5):328–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.05.007
44.Mahmud S, Shah SA, Khattak SZ. Neonatal pain and preventive strategies: an experience in a tertiary care unit. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Apr 9];29(1):42–4. Available from: http://www.demo.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/view/830
45.Bembich S, Cont G, Causin E, Paviotti G, Marzari P, Demarini S. Infant Analgesia With a Combination of Breast Milk, Glucose, or Maternal Holding. Pediatr [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 1];142(3):e20173416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3416
46.Pandita A, Panghal A, Gupta G, Verma A, Pillai A, Singh A, et al. Is kangaroo mother care effective in alleviating vaccination associated pain in early infantile period? A RCT. Early Hum Dev[Internet]. 2018[cited 2022 Dec 1];127:69–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.10.001
47.Milbrandt T, Kryscio R, Muchow R, Walker J, Talwalkar V, Iwinski H. Oral Sucrose for Pain Relief During Clubfoot Casting: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Orthop[Internet]. 2018[cited 2022 Sep 13];38(8):430–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000000845
48.Maciel HIA, Costa MF, Costa ACL, Marcatto J de O, Manzo BF, Bueno M. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures of pain management and treatment among neonates. Rev bras ter intensiva[Internet]. 2019[cited 2022 Dec 1];31(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20190007
49.Koç Özkan T, Şimşek Küçükkelepçe D, Aydin Özkan S. The effects of acupressure and foot massage on pain during heel lancing in neonates: A randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med[Internet]. 2019[cited 2022 Oct 13];46:103–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.08.004
50.Dar JY, Goheer L, Shah SA. Analgesic effect of direct breastfeeding during bcg vaccination in healthy neonates. J Ayub Med Col Abbottabad [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 9];31(3):379–82. Available from: http://www.demo.ayubmed.edu.pk/index.php/jamc/article/view/2978
51.Passariello A, Montaldo P, Palma M, Cirillo M, Di Guida C, Esposito S, et al. Neonatal painful stimuli: skin conductance algesimeter index to measure efficacy 24% of sucrose oral solution. J Mat-Fetal Neo Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 9]; 33(21):3596-601.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1580690
52.Razaghi N, Aemmi SZ, Hoseini ASS, Boskabadi H, Mohebbi T, Ramezani M. The effectiveness of familiar olfactory stimulation with lavender scent and glucose on the pain of blood sampling in term neonates: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Complement Ther Med [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 1];49:102289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102289
53.Fitri SYR, Lusmilasari L, Juffrie M, Bellieni CV. Modified Sensory Stimulation Using Breastmilk for Reducing Pain Intensity in Neonates in Indonesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Ped Nurs[Internet]. 2020[cited 2022 Jul 1];53:e199–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.004
54.Vu-Ngoc H, Uyen NCM, Thinh OP, Don LD, Danh NVT, Truc NTT, et al. Analgesic effect of non-nutritive sucking in term neonates: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Neonatol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 13];61(1):106–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.07.003
55.Yilmaz D, Inal S. Effects of three different methods used during heel lance procedures on pain level in term neonates. Jpn J Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 2]; 17(4):e12338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12338
56.Chang J, Filoteo L, Nasr AS. Comparing the Analgesic Effects of 4 Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Term Newborns Undergoing Heel Lance. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Aug 13;Publish Ahead of Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jpn.0000000000000495
57.Oğul T, Kurt FY. Effect of acupressure on procedural pain before heel lancing in neonates. J Tradit Chin Med [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 9]; 41(2):331-7. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/3616
58.Avcin E, Kucukoglu S. The effect of breastfeeding, kangaroo care, and facilitated tucking positioning in reducing the pain during heel stick in neonates. J Pediatr Nurs [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 9];61:410–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.10.002
59.Toledo Gotor C, García Muro C, Pérez García MA, Ruiz del Prado MY, Toledo Gotor C, García Muro C, et al. Analgesia no farmacológica durante la realización del cribado metabólico. Aplicación en otros procedimientos dolorosos. Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 9];23(89):e11–6. Available from: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1139-76322021000100008
60.Chen Y, Li Y, Sun J, Han D, Feng S, Zhang X. The Effect of Maternal Voice on Venipuncture Induced Pain in Neonates: A Randomized Study. Pain Manag Nurs [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 19];22(5):668-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.002
61.Melo GM de, Cardoso MVLML, Almeida PC de, Rodrigues EC. Effect of music combined with swaddling on pain in full-term newborns: randomized clinical trial. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Oct 25];75(3):e20210017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0017
62.Yavaş S, Bülbül T, Topçu Gavas H. The effect on pain level and comfort of foot massages given by mothers to newborns before heel lancing: Double‐blind randomized controlled study. Jpn J Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 20]; 18(4):e12421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12421
63.Wu H, Zhang J, Ding Q, Wang S, Li J. Effect analysis of embracing breast milk sucking to relieve pain of neonatal heel blood sampling: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Palliat Med [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 10];10(4):4384–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-329
64.Stadler J, Avian A, Pichler G, Posch K, Urlesberger B, Raith W. Laser acupuncture versus oral glucose administration for pain prevention in term neonates: an observer-blinded non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial. Acupunct Med [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 4];39(6):589–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09645284211009544
65.Unvar F, Tas Arslan F. Effectiveness of maternal-targeted training on nonpharmacologic pain management on heel stick sampling: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2023;73:e477-e83. DOI: https://doi-org.ez17.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1016/j.pedn.2023.10.018
66.Napiórkowska-Orkisz M, Gutysz-Wojnicka A, Tanajewska M, Sadowska-Krawczenko I. Evaluation of Methods to Minimize Pain in Newborns during Capillary Blood Sampling for Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 13];19(2):870. DOI: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/870#
67.Tavlar M, Karakoc A. The effect of breastfeeding, breast milk odour and mother’s heartbeat sound on pain level in newborns: A randomized trial. Int J Nurs Pract [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 20];28(6):e13067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13067
68.Patel DV, Soni SN, Shukla VV, Phatak AG, Shinde MK, Nimbalkar AS, et al. Efficacy of Skin-to-Skin Care versus Swaddling for Pain Control Associated with Vitamin K Administration in Full-Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Trop Pediatr [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 6];68(4):fmac052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmac052
69.Çövener Özçelik Ç, Eren Ö, Sabaz N, Bulut M. Effect of using crochet octopus in reducing the pain: a randomized controlled study. J Trop Pediatr [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 5];69(1):fmac107.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmac107
70.Talebi M, Amiri SRJ, Roshan PA, Zabihi A, Zahedpasha Y, Chehrazi M. The effect of concurrent use of swaddle and sucrose on the intensity of pain during venous blood sampling in neonate: a clinical trial study. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 May 10];22(1):263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03323-0
71.Avan Antepli N, Bilsin Kocamaz E, Güngörmüs¸ Z. The Effect of Vibration on Pain During Heel Lance Procedures in Newborns. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 22];263(2), E43-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000918
72.Erdoğan Ç, Çamur Z. The Impact of Breast Milk Taste and Smell in Reducing Pain in Infants Undergoing Blood Drawing Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Study. Breastfeed Med [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 17];17(8):673-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2022.0055
73.Küçüktepe A, Canbulat Şahiner N. The effect of regional massage performed before blood collection on pain and vital signs in newborns. J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Apr;59(4):660-666. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16368
74.Bektas IL, Oktay SŞ, Köylü P, Ulu H, Akdeniz Kudubeş A. The Effect of Breastfeeding on the Newborn's Comfort and Pain Levels During Heel Blood Collection. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2024 Mar;47(1):20-30. DOI: 10.1080/24694193.2023.2259991
75.Bueno M, Ballantyne M, Campbell-Yeo M, Estabrooks CA, Gibbins S, Harrison D, et al. The effectiveness of repeated sucrose for procedural pain in neonates in a longitudinal observational study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 7;4:1110502. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1110502
76.Slater R, Cornelissen L, Fabrizi L, Patten D, Yoxen J, Worley A, et al. Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1225-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61303-7
77.WHO report. Reducing pain at the time of vaccination: WHO position paper, September 2015—Recommendations. 2016 July 12;34(32):3629-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.005
78.Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. Nota Técnica nº 39/2021 Ministério da Saúde, dispõe sobre amamentação como medida não farmacológica para redução da dor durante a administração de vacinas injetáveis em crianças. [Internet]. Brasilia; 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 14]. Available from: https://portaldeboaspraticas.iff.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Nota-Tecnica-39_2021-COCAM-e-CGPNI-Amamentacao-e-alivio-da-dor-1.pdf
79.Rosa IT, Rossato LM, Guedes DMB, Fogaça VD, Domingues F, Silva L. Beliefs, knowledge, actions of nursing techniques in breastfeeding in pain management in immunization. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jul 18;75(6):e20210546. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0546
80.Harrison D, Reszel J, Bueno M, Sampson M, Shah VS, Taddio A, et al. Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 28;10(10):CD011248. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011248.pub2
81.Sharma H, Ruikar M. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) for procedural pain in infants: A meta-analysis from the current evidence of randomized control trials and cross-over trials. J Family Med Prim Care [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 11];11(4):1250-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1383_21
Correspondence
Maria Augusta Rocha Bezerra
Email: mariaaugusta@ufpi.edu.br
Copyright© 2024 Journal of Nursing UFPE on line/REUOL.
This is an open access article distributed under the Attribution CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which allows others to distribute, remix, adapt and create from your work, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you for the original creation. It is recommended to maximize the dissemination and use of licensed materials.



















