Uma visão sistemática sobre o uso da história nos debates atuais em sociologia e sobre o potencial e os problemas de uma epistemologia histórica da sociologia

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2317-5427.2026.268738

Palavras-chave:

Gaston Bachelard, história das ciências sociais, historiografia, teoria sociológica

Resumo

Por várias razões, dentre elas mudanças no regime global de ensino superior e reivindicações de conhecimento competitivas de outras disciplinas, o campo da história da sociologia (HoS) tem experimentado uma pressão crescente para justificar sua própria existência durante a última década. Postulando que a melhor abordagem para justificar a existência de uma coisa é mostrar a sua utilidade, o artigo discute quatro tipos de reivindicações de utilidade feitas por historiadores da sociologia. A história da sociologia pode ser considerada relevante por (I) moldar e manter a identidade da disciplina; (II) por fornecer um rico fundo de ensino para futuros sociólogos; (III) por informar pesquisas e teorizações atuais; e (IV) por refletir mais amplamente sobre o status cultural da sociologia nas sociedades modernas. O artigo então avalia o potencial e os problemas de aspirar a uma epistemologia histórica da sociologia, uma proposta feita recentemente, especialmente em contextos alemães e anglófonos, para vincular a história da ciência com sua filosofia no sentido descrito como tipo III. Conclui que princípios ou ideias selecionados da epistemologia histórica podem ser aplicados de forma muito proveitosa em HoS. No entanto, o projeto de transferir todo o programa de epistemologia histórica para HoS está fadado ao fracasso. Há, no entanto, muitas razões para continuar a conceber HoS como parte integrante da sociologia.

Biografia do Autor

Christian Dayé, Graz University of Technology

Graz University of Technology. Christian Dayé é pesquisador do Departamento de Sociologia da Universidade de Graz, na Áustria. Os seus interesses de pesquisa incluem a história das ciências sociais no século XX, teoria e metodologia sociológicas e estudos científicos. Tem publicado em diversos periódicos das áreas de história das ciências, sociologia, teoria social e interdisciplinares. O seu mais recente livro, intitulado Die Hoffnungen der Auguren: Techniken der Sozialprognose im Amerika des Kalten Krieges, é sobre o desenvolvimento de técnicas de prospecção em ciências sociais durante as primeiras décadas da Guerra Fria. 

O texto foi originalmente publicado em 2018, no volume 49 do journal The American Sociologist, periódico criado em 1965 e publicado pela American Sociological Association.

Referências

ABBOTT, A. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.

ALEXANDER, J. The centrality of the classics. In: TURNER, S. P. (Ed.). Social theory & sociology: The classics and beyond. Cambridge (MA); Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. p. 21–38.

ARON, R. Les étapes de la pensée sociologique: Montesquieu. Comte. Marx. Tocqueville. Durkheim. Pareto. Weber. Paris: Gallimard, 1976.

BACHELARD, G. The psychoanalysis of fire. Translated by A. C. M. Ross. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.

BACHELARD, G. La Philosophie du Non: Essai d’une philosophie du nouvel esprit scientifique. 4. éd. Paris: Les Presse universitaires de France, 1966.

BACHELARD, G. Epistemologie: Ausgewählte Texte. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; Wien: Ullstein, 1974.

BACHELARD, G. The new scientific spirit. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.

BACHELARD, G. The dialectic of duration. Introduction by Cristina Chimisso. Translated by M. M. Jones. Manchester: Clinamen, 2000.

BACHELARD, G. The formation of the scientific mind: A contribution to a psychoanalysis of objective knowledge. Translated by M. M. Jones. Manchester: Clinamen, 2002.

BACKHOUSE, R.; FONTAINE, P. (Ed.). A historiography of the modern social sciences. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

BAEHR, P. Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the social sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.

BARNES, H. E. (Ed.). An introduction to the history of sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1948.

BLUMENBERG, H. Das Lachen der Thrakerin: Eine Urgeschichte der Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1987.

BLUMENBERG, H. The laughter of the Thracian woman: A protohistory of theory. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

BOTTOMORE, T.; NISBET, R. (Ed.). A history of sociological analysis. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

BOURDIEU, P. Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988.

BOURDIEU, P. The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Translated by S. Emanuel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996.

BOURDIEU, P. Political interventions: Social science and political action. Texts selected and introduced by Franck Poupeau and Thierry Discepolo. Translated by D. Fernbach. London; New York: Verso, 2008.

BOURDIEU, P.; CHAMBOREDON, J.-C.; PASSERON, J. C. The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991.

BRENNER, A. Quelle épistémologie historique? Kuhn, Feyerabend, Hacking et l’école bachelardienne. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, v. 49, n. 1, p. 113–125, 2006.

BUCHOLC, M. Sociology in Poland: To be continued? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

BURKE, P. What is the history of knowledge? Cambridge (UK); Malden (MA): Polity, 2016.

CALHOUN, C. (Ed.). Sociology in America: a history. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.

CAMIC, C. The Utilitarians revisited. American Journal of Sociology, v. 85, n. 3, p. 516–550, 1979.

CAMIC, C. On the methodology of the history of sociology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 86, n. 5, p. 1139–1144, 1981.

CAMIC, C. Uneven development in the history of sociology. Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 23, n. 2, p. 227–233, 1997.

CAMIC, C.; GROSS, N.; LAMONT, M. (Ed.). Social knowledge in the making. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.

CANGUILHEM, G. Le rôle de l’épistémologie dans l’historiographie scientifique contemporaine. In: CANGUILHEM, G. Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie: nouvelles études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences. Paris: Vrin, 1981. p. 11–30.

CANGUILHEM, G. L’objet de l’histoire des sciences. In: CANGUILHEM, G. Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences. 7. éd. Paris: Vrin, 1994a. p. 9–23.

CANGUILHEM, G. L’histoire des sciences dans l’œuvre épistémologique de Gaston Bachelard. In: CANGUILHEM, G. Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences. 7. éd. Paris: Vrin, 1994b. p. 173–186.

CHAPOULIE, J.-M. A framework for the history of social and behavioral sciences. Sociologica, n. 2–3, p. 24, 2009a.

CHAPOULIE, J.-M. Rejoinder to Daniel Geary, Johan Heilbron, Jennifer Platt, and Alan Sica. Sociologica, n. 2–3, p. 4, 2009b.

CHEN, H. F. Chinese sociology: state-building and the institutionalization of globally circulated knowledge. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.palgrave.com/in/book/9781137582195. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2018.

CHIMISSO, C. The tribunal of philosophy and its norms: history and philosophy in Georges Canguilhem’s historical epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, v. 34, p. 297–327, 2003.

CHIMISSO, C. Gaston Bachelard: critic of science and the imagination. London; New York: Routledge, 2013.

COHEN-COLE, J. The open mind: Cold War politics and the sciences of human nature. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.

COLLINS, R. The sociology of philosophies: a global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge (MA); London: Harvard University Press, 1998.

COSER, L. A. Masters of sociological thought: ideas in historical and social context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.

COSSU, A.; BORTOLINI, M. Italian sociology, 1945–2010: an intellectual and institutional profile. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

CROTHERS, C. Sociologies of New Zealand. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.palgrave.com/in/book/9783319738666. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2018.

DA SILVA, F. C. Sociology in Portugal: a short history. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

DASTON, L. Historical epistemology. In: CHANDLER, J. K.; DAVIDSON, A. I.; HAROOTUNIAN, H. D. (Ed.). Questions of evidence: proof, practice, and persuasion across the disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. p. 282–289.

DASTON, L. Recherches en l’épistémologie historique des sciences: empirisme et objectivité. Rapport sur les recherches actuelles de Max Planck Institut pour l’Histoire des Sciences, Berlin, Centre Alexandre Koyré, Paris, 24.III.97. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, v. 64, 1997.

DAYÉ, C. Eine Unterscheidung, keine Trennung: Soziologiegeschichte mit Robert K. Merton. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, v. 37, n. 1, p. 79–84, 2012.

DAYÉ, C. Why dead ends may remain well-trodden paths: epistemic hopes and obstacles in the history of the Delphi technique. In: WISSELGREN, P.; BAEHR, P.; YUI, K. (Ed.). International histories of sociology: conference proceedings of the research committee on history of sociology from the XIV ISA world congress of sociology in Yokohama, 13–19 July 2014. p. 34–42, 2015.

DAYÉ, C.; MOEBIUS, S. (Ed.). Soziologiegeschichte: Wege und Ziele. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015.

DEEGAN, M. J. Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago school, 1892–1918. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1988.

ELIAS, N. What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press, 1978.

ENDREß, M. Zur Relevanz und Konzeptualisierung von soziologischer Soziologiegeschichte in wissenssoziologischer Absicht. In: DAYÉ, C.; MOEBIUS, S. (Ed.). Soziologiegeschichte: Wege und Ziele. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015. p. 488–521.

ERICKSON, M. Why should I read histories of science? History of the Human Sciences, v. 23, n. 4, p. 68–91, 2010a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110372022.

ERICKSON, M. Why should I read histories of science? A response to Patricia Fara, Steve Fuller and Joseph Rouse. History of the Human Sciences, v. 23, n. 4, p. 105–108, 2010b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110372026.

ERICKSON, P. The world the game theorists made. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.

ERICKSON, P. et al. How reason almost lost its mind: the strange career of Cold War rationality. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.

FANNING, B.; HESS, A. Sociology in Ireland: a short history. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

FARA, P. Why Mark Erickson should read different histories of science. History of the Human Sciences, v. 23, n. 4, p. 92–94, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110372023.

FLECK, L. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

FLECK, C. Sociology in Austria. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

FLECK, C.; DAYÉ, C. Methodology of the history of the social and behavioral sciences. In: WRIGHT, J. D. (Ed.). The international encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences. 2. ed. v. 15. Oxford: Elsevier, 2015. p. 319–325.

FOUCAULT, M. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. London; New York: Routledge, 2002a.

FOUCAULT, M. Archaeology of knowledge. Tradução: A. M. Sheridan Smith. London; New York: Routledge, 2002b.

FULLER, S. History of science for its own sake? History of the Human Sciences, v. 23, n. 4, p. 95–99, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110372024.

GANS, H. J. Sociological amnesia: the noncumulation of normal social science. Sociological Forum, v. 7, n. 4, p. 701–710, 1992.

GEARY, D. Comment on Jean-Michel Chapoulie. Sociologica, n. 2–3, p. 5, 2009.

GILLESPIE, R. Manufacturing knowledge: a history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge (England): Cambridge University Press, 1991.

GINGRAS, Y. Naming without necessity: on the genealogy and uses of the label “historical epistemology”. Revue de Synthèse, v. 131, n. 3, p. 439–454, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11873-010-0124-1.

GOETTING, A. Individual voices, collective visions: fifty years of women in sociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995.

GOLDBERG, C. A. Modernity and the Jews in western social thought. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2017.

GOULDNER, A. The coming crisis of western sociology. New York; London: Basic Books, 1970.

HANEY, D. P. The Americanization of social science: intellectuals and public responsibility in the postwar United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2008.

HARLEY, K.; WICKHAM, G. Australian sociology: fragility, survival, rivalry. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

HEALY, K. Fuck nuance. Sociological Theory, v. 35, n. 2, p. 118–127, 2017.

HEILBRON, J. Comment on Jean-Michel Chapoulie. Sociologica, n. 2–3, p. 5, 2009.

HEYCK, H. Age of system: understanding the development of modern social science. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015.

HIRSCHHORN, M. The place of the history of sociology in French sociology. Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 3–7, 1997.

HUEBNER, D. R. Becoming Mead: the social process of academic knowledge. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.

IGO, S. E. The averaged American: surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Cambridge (MA); London: Harvard University Press, 2007.

ISAAC, J. Working knowledge: making the human sciences from Parsons to Kuhn. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2012.

JONES, R. A. Durkheim’s response to Spencer: an essay toward historicism in the historiography of sociology. The Sociological Quarterly, v. 15, n. 3, p. 341–358, 1974.

JONES, R. A. On understanding a sociological classic. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 279–319, 1977.

JONES, R. A. On Camic’s antipresentist methodology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 86, n. 5, p. 1133–1138, 1981.

JONES, R. A. On Merton’s “history” and “systematics” of sociological theory. In: GRAHAM, L.; LEPENIES, W.; WEINGART, P. (Ed.). Functions and uses of disciplinary histories. Dordrecht; Boston; Lancaster: D. Reidel, 1983a. p. 121–142.

JONES, R. A. The new history of sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 9, p. 447–469, 1983b.

JONES, R. A. Second thoughts on privileged access. Sociological Theory, v. 3, n. 1, p. 16–19, 1985.

JONES, R. A. Sociology and irony. Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 23, n. 3, p. 455–460, 1997.

JUNG, C. G. Man and his symbols. New York: Anchor, 1964.

KAESLER, D. Guardians of canonical wisdom: Why some of us care for the history of sociology. Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 25, n. 2, p. 149–159, 1999.

KAESLER, D. (Ed.). Klassiker der Soziologie. Band I: Von Auguste Comte bis Norbert Elias. 4. Aufl. München: Beck, 2003a.

KAESLER, D. (Ed.). Klassiker der Soziologie. Band II: Von Talcott Parsons bis Pierre Bourdieu. München: Beck, 2003b.

KERN, S. A cultural history of causality: Science, murder novels, and systems of thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. Disponível em: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=457841. Acesso em: 30 ago. 2017.

KINZEL, K. Geschichte ohne Kausalität. Abgrenzungsstrategien gegen die Wissenschaftssoziologie in zeitgenössischen Ansätzen historischer Epistemologie. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, v. 35, n. 2, p. 147–162, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201201551.

KOYRÉ, A. From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1957.

KROPP, K. A historical account of Danish sociology: A troubled sociology. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2017.

KUHN, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2. ed., enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

LARSSON, A.; MAGDALENIĆ, S. Sociology in Sweden: A history. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

LAW, A.; LYBECK, E. R. Sociological amnesia: Cross-currents in disciplinary history. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.

LECOURT, D. Marxism and epistemology: Bachelard, Canguilhem and Foucault. Tradução de Ben Brewster. London: NLB, 1975.

LEPENIES, W. (Ed.). Geschichte der Soziologie. Studien zur kognitiven, sozialen und historischen Identität einer Disziplin. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.

LEPENIES, W. Die drei Kulturen: Soziologie zwischen Literatur und Wissenschaft. München: Hanser, 1985.

MADGE, J. The origins of scientific sociology. London: Tavistock, 1963.

MANDLER, P. Return from the natives: How Margaret Mead won the Second World War and lost the Cold War. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2013.

MASSON, P.; SCHRECKER, C. Sociology in France after 1945. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

MERTON, R. K. Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 13, p. 1–28, 1987.

MORRIS, A. D. The scholar denied: W. E. B. Du Bois and the birth of modern sociology. Oakland (CA): The University of California Press, 2015.

MOZETIČ, G. Erkenntnisfortschritte in der Soziologiegeschichte. Eine methodologische und fallspezifische Analyse. In: DAYÉ, C.; MOEBIUS, S. (Eds.). Soziologiegeschichte. Wege und Ziele. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015. p. 522–568.

O’RAND, A. M. Masters and milieus: Transmitting the history of sociology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, v. 18, n. 2, p. 272–278, 1982.

PARK, R. E.; BURGESS, E. W.; MCKENZIE, R. D. The city: Suggestions for investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984.

PLATT, J. Comment on Jean-Michel Chapoulie. Sociologica, v. 2009, n. 2–3, p. 9, 2009.

POGGI, G. Lego quia inutile: An alternative justification for the classics. In: TURNER, S. P. (Ed.). Social theory & sociology: The classics and beyond. Cambridge (MA); Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. p. 39–47.

RAM, U. Israeli sociology: Text in context. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Disponível em: www.palgrave.com/in/book/9783319593265. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2018.

REED, I. A. Epistemology contextualized: Social-scientific knowledge in a postpositivist era. Sociological Theory, v. 28, n. 1, p. 20–39, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01365.x.

RENN, J. Historical epistemology and interdisciplinarity. In: Physics, philosophy, and the scientific community. Dordrecht: Springer, 1995. p. 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_14.

RHEINBERGER, H.-J. Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 1997.

RHEINBERGER, H.-J. An epistemology of the concrete: Twentieth-century histories of life. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010a.

RHEINBERGER, H.-J. On historizing epistemology. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 2010b.

RINDZEVIČIŪTĖ, E. The power of systems: How policy sciences opened up the Cold War world. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 2016.

ROHDE, J. Armed with expertise: The militarization of American social research during the Cold War. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 2013.

ROUDINESCO, E. Philosophy in turbulent times: Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida. Tradução de W. McCuaig. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.

ROUSE, J. Why write histories of science? History of the Human Sciences, v. 23, n. 4, p. 100–104, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110372025.

SAVELBERG, J. J.; FLOOD, S. American criminology meets Collins: Global theory of intellectual change and a policy-oriented field. Sociological Forum, v. 26, n. 1, p. 21–44, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01223.x.

SCHMIDT, G.; TIETZ, M. Einleitung. In: Die Philosophie des Nein. Versuch einer Philosophie des neuen wissenschaftlichen Geistes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980. p. 7–16.

SCHNEIDERHAN, E. The size of others’ burdens: Barack Obama, Jane Addams, and the politics of helping others. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 2015.

SEIDMAN, S. The historicist controversy. Sociological Theory, v. 3, n. 1, p. 13–16, 1985.

SICA, A. The dire need for history: Amnesia and sociology in the U.S. Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 24, n. 2, p. 191–198, 1998.

SICA, A. Comment on Jean-Michel Chapoulie: Utopian historiography. Sociologica, v. 2009, n. 2–3, p. 6, 2009.

SIMONS, M. The many encounters of Thomas Kuhn and French epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, v. 61, p. 41–50, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.01.004.

SKOVASJA, M.; BALON, J. Sociology in the Czech Republic: Between East and West. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

SMITH, C. The sacred project of American sociology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.

SOLOVEY, M. Shaky foundations: The politics-patronage-social science nexus in Cold War America. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2013.

SOLOVEY, M.; CRAVENS, H. (Eds.). Cold War social science: Knowledge production, liberal democracy, and human nature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

SOORYAMOORTHY, R. Sociology in South Africa: Colonial, apartheid and democratic forms. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

SRUBAR, I. Wozu Geschichte der Soziologie? Die Soziologiegeschichte als historische Wissenssoziologie. In: DAYÉ, C.; MOEBIUS, S. (Eds.). Soziologiegeschichte: Wege und Ziele. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015. p. 465–487.

STEINMETZ, G. How and why do we write the history of the social sciences? The Institute Letter, Institute for Advanced Study, Spring 2018, p. 12–13.

STINCHCOMBE, A. L. Should sociologists forget their mothers and fathers? The American Sociologist, v. 17, p. 2–11, 1982.

SWEDBERG, R. History of sociology as the working memory of sociology. Timelines: Newsletter of the ASA History of Sociology Section, v. 20, n. 1, p. 11–12, 2012.

SWEDBERG, R. History of sociology as the working memory of sociology (part 2). Timelines: Newsletter of the ASA History of Sociology Section, v. 21, n. 1–2, p. 20–21, 2013.

THOMAS, W. Rational action: The sciences of policy in Britain and America, 1940–1960. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2015. Acesso em: 22 fev. 2016.

TILES, M. Bachelard: Science and objectivity. Cambridge; London; New York etc.: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

TITARENKO, L.; ZDRAVOMYSLOVA, E. Sociology in Russia: A brief history. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

TURNER, S. P. Weltgeist, intention, and reproduction. Sociological Theory, v. 3, n. 1, p. 23–28, 1985.

TURNER, S. Who’s afraid of the history of sociology? Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 24, n. 1, p. 3–10, 1998.

TURNER, S. P. American sociology: From pre-disciplinary to post-normal. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

TURNER, S. P.; TURNER, J. H. The impossible science: An institutional analysis of American sociology. Newbury Park; London; New Delhi: Sage, 1990.

VALADE, B. Sociology in quest of its past. Swiss Journal of Sociology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 9–14, 1997.

VANDERSTRAETEN, R.; LOUCKS, K. Sociology in Belgium: A sociological history. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Disponível em: www.palgrave.com/in/book/9781137556622. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2018.

VIDICH, A. J.; LYMAN, S. M. American sociology: Worldly rejections of religion and their directions. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1985.

WARNER, R. S. Sociological theory and history of sociology. Sociological Theory, v. 3, n. 1, p. 20–23, 1985.

WELZ, F. Bastler. Sammler: Spurensucher. Zum Verhältnis von Geschichte und Systematik der soziologischen Theorie nach Robert K. Merton. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, v. 35, n. 3, p. 19–37, 2010.

WELZ, F. Wissensgeschichte jenseits von Ahnenkult und Andeutungssuche. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, v. 37, n. 1, p. 85–88, 2012.

WOODWARD, W. R. A commentary on the symposium: The use of history in the social sciences curriculum. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, v. 18, n. 2, p. 286–289, 1982.

Downloads

Publicado

06-05-2026