Reward and Punishment from Consumers Towards Ethical and Corrupt Companies: A study on price promotion and purchase intention

Kavita Miadaira Hamza, Vitor Koki da Costa Nogami, Josmar Andrade

Resumo


Although many studies investigate if consumers punish or reward un/ethical products, there were not find researches specific on consumer behavior towards ethical and corrupt companies, so it is an important gap, which we intend to cover. The purpose of this study was to verify if price promotion and company profile (ethical or corrupt) influence purchase intentions. It was used an experiment using 2 (price promotion: discount vs. no discount) vs. 3 (company profile: corrupt vs. NCNE vs. ethical) groups, with a sample of 246 cases between subjects. Our findings show consumers do not value the ethical behavior of companies, but penalize corrupt behavior. The price promotion stimulus was also not effective, which means that price promotion does not affect the willingness to pay. The results suggest that companies should behave ethically, if not by the reward they could get for it, at least for the punishment consumers are willing to give them.


Palavras-chave


Business Ethics; Ethical Consumer; Corruption.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Andorfer, V. A., Liebe, U. (2015). Do information, price, or morals influence ethical consumption? A natural field experiment and customer survey on the purchase of Fair Trade coffee. Social Science Research, 52, 330-350.

Carey, L., Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2008). The impact of ethical concerns on family consumer decision‐making. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 553-560.

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139-158.

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.

Cheit, E. F. (1964). Why managers cultivate social responsibility. California Management Review, 7(1), 3-22.

Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A., Kyriazakis, I. & Frewer, L. J. (2017). Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. Food Policy, 68, 112-127.

Ferreira, A. I. & Ribeiro, I. (2016). Are you willing to pay the price? The impact of corporate social (ir)responsibility on consumer behavior towards national and foreign brands. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 16, 63-71.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44-61.

Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Pearson Prentice.

Herrmann, R. O. (1970). Consumerism: Its goals, organizations and future. The Journal of Marketing, 55-60.

Jägel, T., Keeling, K., Reppel, A., & Gruber, T. (2012). Individual values and motivational complexities in ethical clothing consumption: A means-end approach. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3-4), 373-396.

Miller, K. E., & Sturdivant, F. D. (1977). Consumer responses to socially questionable corporate behavior: An empirical test. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 1-7.

Moosmayer, D. C. (2012). Negativity bias in consumer price response to ethical information. Business Ethics: a European Review, 21(2), 198-208.

Mulhern, F. J., & Padgett, D. T. (1995). The relationship between retail price promotions and regular price purchases. The Journal of Marketing, 83-90.

Palihawadana, D., Oghazi, P., Liu, Y. (2016). Effects of ethical ideologies and perceptions of CSR onconsumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4964-4969.

Papaoikonomou, E. (2013). Sustainable lifestyles in an urban context: towards a holistic understanding of ethical consumer behaviours. Empirical evidence from Catalonia, Spain. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 181-188.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson.

Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61.

Uusitalo, O., & Oksanen, R. (2004). Ethical consumerism: a view from Finland. International journal of consumer studies, 28(3), 214-221.

Van Heerde, H. J. (2005). The proper interpretation of sales promotion effects: supplement elasticities with absolute sales effects. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21(4-5), 397-402.

Wheale, P., & Hinton, D. (2007). Ethical consumers in search of markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(4), 302-315.

White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103-118.

Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20-31.


Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2017 CBR - Consumer Behavior Review

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

  

  RePEc Ideas

Flag Counter

Consumer Behavior Review - eISSN: 2526-7884

Creative Commons License
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License