Traditional consumer behavior study models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2021.247815Keywords:
history, consumer behavior, study models, Behavioral Perspective Model.Abstract
The article aims to systematize the various research models on consumer behavior, describe the relevant research strategies for consumer decision making and ponder the characteristics of each theoretical model. Thus, the article discusses the historical, theoretical and methodological aspects of models for studying consumer behavior. Based on this review, there is a predominance of explanations in Psychology that focus primarily on dispositional variables, with a socio-cognitive orientation in the field of exchange relations between products or services. The present work defends the option for the Behavioral Perspective Model (BPM), since it synthesizes empirical evidence in its theoretical behavioral basis derived from the identification of situational variables. The BPM has as its source the concepts of Skinner's Radical Behaviorism using the triple contingency as a theoretical instrument. Research with the theoretical approach of BPM presents an environmental and learning history perspective to analyze the effects of the consequences on this operating behavior that is maintained by utilitarian and informative consequences associated with responses related to consumption.References
Alhadeff, David A. (1982). Microeconomics and human behavior: Toward a new synthesis of economics and psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Allen, M.W. (1997). The direct and indirect influences of human values on consumer choices. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Allen, M. W. (2000). The attribute-mediation and product meaning approaches to the influences of human values on consumer choices. In: F. Columbus (Org.). Advances in psychology research (pp.33-76). Huntington, NY: N. Science Pub.
Allen, M. W. (2001). A practical method for uncovering the direct and indirect relationships between human values and consumer purchases. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 102-120.
Allen, M. W., NG, S. H., & Wilson, M. (2002). The functional approach to instrumental and terminal values and the value-attitude-behavior system. European Journal of Marketing, 36(1-2), 111- 135.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2008). Comportamento do consumidor. 9ª ed. São Paulo: Cengage Learning.
Blackwell, R. D., Souza, C., Taghian, M., Miniard, P., & Engel, J. (2001). Consumer behavior. 9th ed. Orlando: Harcourt.
Brasil. Código de Defesa do Consumidor (Lei nº 8.078/ 1990). Recuperado em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078.htm
Cavalcanti, P. R., Oliveira-Castro, J. M., & Foxall, G. R. (2013). Individual differences in consumer buying patterns: a behavioral economic analysis. Psychological Record, 63.
Colley, R. H. (1961). Defining advertising goals for measured advertising results. New York: Association of National Advertisers.
Dias, M. B., & Oliveira-Castro, J. M. (2006). Comportamento de procura por produtos: efeitos da quantidade de marcas. Revista Psicologia, 6(1), 195-232.
DiClemente, D. F., & Hantula, D. A. (2003). Applied behavioral economics and consumer choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(5), 589-602.
Engel, J., Blackwell, R., & Kollat, D. (1968). Consumer Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1986). Consumer Behavior. (5th ed.). Chicago, Dryden Press.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanf. U. Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Foxall, G. R. (1987). Radical behaviorism and consumer research theoretical promise and empirical problems. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 4(2), 11-127.
Foxall, G. R. (1990). Consumer psychology in behavioral perspective. London e New York: Routledge.
Foxall, G. R. (1992). The behavioral perspective model of purchase and consumption: From consumer theory to marketing practice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(2), 189-198.
Foxall, G. R. (1998). Radical Behaviorist Interpretation: Generating and evaluating an account of consumer behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 321-354.
Foxall, G. R. (2005). Understanding consumer choice. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Foxall, G. R. (2010a). Interpreting consumer choice: The behavioral perspective model. New York: Routledge
Foxall, G. R. (2010b). Invitation to consumer behavior analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 92-109.
Foxall, G. R. (2016). Consumer behavior analysis comes of age. In The routledge companion to consumer behavior analysis, 3-21.
Foxall, G. R., & Greenley, G. E. (2000). Predicting and explaining responses to consumer environments: An empirical test and theoretical extension of the behavioural perspective model. The Service Industries Journal, 20(2), 39-63.
Foxall, G. R., & James, V. K. (2001). The behavioral basis of consumer choice: A preliminary analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 209-220.
Foxall, G. R., Oliveira-Castro, J. M., James, V. K., Yani-de-Soriano, M. M., & Sigurdsson, V. (2006). Consumer behavior analysis and social marketing: The case of environmental conservation. Behavior and social issues, 15(1), 101-125.
Foxall, G. R., Oliveira-Castro, J. M., & Schrezenmaier, T. C. (2007). The behavioral economics of brand choice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howard, J., & Sheth, J. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: John Wiley.
Jacoby, J., Johar, G. V., & Morrin, M. (1998). Consumer behavior: A quadrennium. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 319-344.
Lawson, R. (2000). Consumer Behaviour. In: Marketing Theory – A Student Text, London: Thomson Learning.
Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G.A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25, 59-62.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
McCarthy, E. J. (1960). Basic marketing: A managerial approach. Illinois, EUA: Richard D. Irwin.
Nalini, L. E. E. G., de Melo Cardoso, M., & Cunha, S. R. (2013). Comportamento do consumidor: uma introdução ao Behavioral Perspective Model (BPM). Revista Fragmentos de Cultura-Revista Interdisciplinar de Ciências Humanas, 23(4), 489-505.
Nicosia, F. M. M. (1966). Consumer decision processes: marketing and advertising implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Oliveira‐Castro, J. M., Cavalcanti, P. R., & Foxall, G. R. (2016). What consumers maximize: Brand choice as a function of utilitarian and informational reinforcement. Managerial and Decision Economics, 37(4-5), 360-371.
Oliveira-Castro, J. M., & Foxall, G. R. (2005). Análise do comportamento do consumidor. In J. A. Rodrigues & M. R. Ribeiro (Orgs.). Análise do comportamento: Pesquisa, teoria e aplicação (pp. 283-304). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Oliveira-Castro, J. M., Foxall, G. R., James, V. K., Pohl, R. H., Dias, M. B., & Chang, S. W. (2008). Consumer-based brand equity and brand performance. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 445-461
Oliveira-Castro, J. M, Foxall, G. R., & Schrezenmaier, T. C (2005). Patterns of consumer response to retail price differentials. The Service Industries Journal, 25, 1-27.
Oliveira‐Castro, J. M., Foxall, G. R., & Schrezenmaier, T. C. (2007). Consumer brand choice: Individual and group analyses of demand elasticity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85(2), 147-166.
Rodrigues, A. R. (1973). Psicologia social. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Vozes.
Rosenthal, B. (2007). Comportamento de consumo: uma análise dos fatores que controlam a escolha de bebidas com base no modelo na perspectiva comportamental, de Foxall. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia Experimental) - Faculdade de Psicologia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna, M. P. (Org.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 25, 1-65.
Sigurdsson, V., Kahamseh, S., Gunnarsson, D., Larsen, N. M., & Foxall, G. R. (2013). An econometric examination of the behavioral perspective model in the context of Norwegian retailing. The Psychological Record, 63(2), 277-294.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Ciência e comportamento humano. São Paulo. Martins Fontes.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (2003). Sobre o behaviorismo. São Paulo. Cultrix.
Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2003). Pricing effects on foraging in a simulated Internet shopping mall Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(5), 653-674.
Solomon, M. R. (2008). O Comportamento do consumidor: comprando, possuindo e sendo. Tradução de Lene Belon Ribeiro 7. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251-278.
Urban, G. L., Hulland. J. S., & Weinberg, B. D. (1993). Premarket forecasting for new consumer durable goods: Modeling categorization, elimination, and consideration phenomena. Journal of Marketing, 57, 2, 47- 62
Yan, J., Foxall, G. R., & Doyle, J. R. (2012). Patterns of reinforcement and the essential value of brands: II. evaluation of a model of consumer choice. The Psychological Record, 62(3), 377-394.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 CBR - Consumer Behavior Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Statement
- The authors authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
- The opinions and ideas expressed in articles are the authors' sole responsibility.
- The authors guarantee that the article is not the result of plagiarism. Failure to do so may result in penalties for the situation.
- Editors can adjust the text and formatting to fit the article according to the journal's publication standards.
- The articles published are the property of CBR and are protected by copyright. However, authors can disclose and make their articles available for free.
