Celebrating Failure: learning lessons from a leading consumer behavior journal’s retractions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2022.254032Keywords:
retraction, Journal of Consumer Research, failure, lessons learned.Abstract
Purpose: A retraction is the removal of a published article from the scientific record. It is an admission of failure. Yet, every retraction, regardless of its cause(s), is instructive. Using the oxymoron/concept of celebrating failure, this study investigates retractions in the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR).
Method: The content of each JCR retraction notice was examined to determine the initiator(s) of the retraction, retractors, reason(s) for retraction, and time-to-retraction.
Findings: According to the findings, JCR issued ten retraction notices between June 2012 and October 2020. The ten retraction notices generated together, and up to April 11, 2022, some 18,378 pageviews, 3,944 PDF downloads, and a total Altmetric Attention Score of 36. The authors of the retracted articles initiated four of the ten retraction processes. The retractors were the authors in five of the cases. The most common reason for retraction, with five occurrences, is “data and analysis anomalies”. It took 947.6 days on average for a JCR retracted article to be withdrawn.
Originality: Instead of pointing fingers and assigning blame, a list of ten lessons learned based on these findings is dressed up. These lessons apply to the JCR and its entire ecosystem, including authors, editors, peer reviewers, readers, its owner, and publisher.
References
Adams, W. C., & Floyd, J. J. (1977). Failure is not a four-letter word. Phi Kappa Phi Journal, 57(4), 37.
Appadurai, A., and Neta Alexander (2020), Failure, Polity Press, Medford, MA.
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2018). Temporal characteristics of retracted articles. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1771-1783.
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2021). Retracted articles–the scientific version of fake news. In Greifeneder, R. et al. (eds.), The Psychology of Fake News: Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation, New York, NY: Routledge, 47-70.
Bendle, N., Wang, X. S., & Mai, F. (2016). Understanding co-authorship among consumer behavior scholars. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 24(1), 1-13.
Birkinshaw, J., & Haas, M. (2016). Increase your return on failure. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 88-93.
Brainard, J., & You, J. (2018). What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’. Science, 25(1), 1-5.
Chen, C., Hu, Z., Milbank, J., & Schultz, T. (2013). A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 234-253.
Chua, C. (2021). Successful failure: The marketisation of failure in an entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Consumer Culture, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211013989
Committee on Publication Ethics (2019), Retraction Guidelines Version 2, https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4
Conroy, G. (2020, March 3). Scientists reveal what they learnt from their biggest mistakes. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/scientists-reveal-what-they-learnt-from-their-biggest-mistakes
Davies, T., Disney, T., & Harrowell, E. (2021). Reclaiming failure in geography: Academic honesty in a neoliberal world. Emotion, Space and Society, 38(February), 100769, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100769
De Haas, B. (2021). What my retraction taught me. Nature, 589(7842), 331.
Eckert, J. (2020). “Shoot! Can We Restart the Interview?”: Lessons From Practicing “Uncomfortable Reflexivity”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 (1), 1-6.
Editors of The Lancet Group (2020). Learning from a retraction. The Lancet, 396(10257), 1056.
Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48-55.
Fahimifar, S., Ghorbi, A., & Ausloos, M. (2022). Are we standing on unreliable shoulders? The effect of retracted papers citations on previous and subsequent published papers: A study of the Web of Science database. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 20(1), 311-325.
Fanelli, D., Wong, J., & Moher, D. (2021). What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses. Accountability in Research, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1947810
Firestein, S. (2015). Failure: Why Science Is So Successful. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2021). Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5181-5199.
Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 505-517.
Hu, G. (2017). Authorship of Retraction Notices: “If Names Are Not Rectified, Then Language Will Not Be in Accord with Truth.”. Publications, 5(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications5020010
Inman, J. J., Campbell, M. C., Kirmani, A., & Price, L. L. (2018). Our vision for the Journal of Consumer Research: It’s all about the consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 955-959.
Jin, G. Z., Jones, B., Lu, S. F., & Uzzi, B. (2019). The reverse Matthew effect: Consequences of retraction in scientific teams. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(3), 492-506.
Kjeldgaard, D., Nøjgaard, M., Hartmann, B. J., Bode, M., Lindberg, F., Mossberg, L., & Östberg, J. (2021). Failure: Perspectives and prospects in marketing and consumption theory. Marketing Theory, 21(2), 277-286.
Leong, S. M. (1989). A citation analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 492-497.
Linkner, Josh (2019, April 21). How Google kills ideas to drive killer innovation. https://joshlinkner.com/2019/how-google-kills-ideas-to-drive-killer-innovation/
Mick, D.G. (2001). From the editor. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), iii-vii.
Moussa, S. (2019). Is Microsoft Academic a viable citation source for ranking marketing journals?. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(5), 569-582.
Moussa, S. (2022). The propagation of error: retracted articles in marketing and their citations. Italian Journal of Marketing, Italian Journal of Marketing, 2022 (1), 11-36.
Newton, N. A., Khanna, C., & Thompson, J. (2008). Workplace failure: Mastering the last taboo. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(3), 227.
Pearson, G. S. (2022). Our Responsibility for Understanding Retractions. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 28(2), 115-116.
Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Berzofsky, M. E. (2020). Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA. Accountability in Research, 27(7), 457-475.
Schmitt, B. H., Cotte, J., Giesler, M., Stephen, A. T., & Wood, S. (2021). Our journal, our intellectual home. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 633-635.
Stephan, U. (2020). Retractions are difficult––Perhaps they shouldn’t be. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 1113.
Stern, A. M., Casadevall, A., Steen, R. G., & Fang, F. C. (2014). Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. eLife, 2014(3), e02956. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02956
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2016). Retractions represent failure. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(3), 11-12.
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2021). How to shape academic freedom in the digital age? Are the retractions of opinionated papers a prelude to “cancel culture” in academia?. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2(November), 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100035
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2017). Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?. Scientometrics, 110(1), 365-370.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Al-Khatib, A. (2021). Ending the retraction stigma: encouraging the reporting of errors in the biomedical record. Research Ethics, 17(2), 251-259.
Van Eck, N.J., & and Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer (version 1.6. 16) [Computer software], Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Vuong, Q. H. (2020a). Reform retractions to make them more transparent. Nature, 582(7811), 149.
Vuong, Q. H. (2020b). The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 119-130.
Wang, X., Bendle, N. T., Mai, F., & Cotte, J. (2015). The Journal of Consumer Research at 40: A historical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 5-18.
Xu, S. B., & Hu, G. (2022). Retraction Stigma and its Communication via Retraction Notices. Minerva, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09465-w
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Statement
- The authors authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
- The opinions and ideas expressed in articles are the authors' sole responsibility.
- The authors guarantee that the article is not the result of plagiarism. Failure to do so may result in penalties for the situation.
- Editors can adjust the text and formatting to fit the article according to the journal's publication standards.
- The articles published are the property of CBR and are protected by copyright. However, authors can disclose and make their articles available for free.
