Four liberal-egalitarian models of global justice

Authors

  • Julian Culp University of Toronto

Keywords:

liberal-egalitarianism, global distributive justice, John Rawls

Abstract

This article presents four models of global distributive justice: Globalism, Statism, Internationalism and Transnationalism. All of these models share the liberal-egalitarian premise that all human beings possess equal moral worth. Globalism defends the global validity of egalitarian principles of distributive justice. Statism denies this and holds that a threshold level of sufficiency is all that global distributive justice requires. Internationalism argues for distinct sets of principles of distributive justice that should regulate interactions among societies. Finally, Transnationalism claims that there is a plurality of contexts of distributive justice within and beyond the state, and that each of these contexts gives rise to separate principles of distributive justice.

References

BEITZ, Charles. Rawls's law of peoples. Ethics, v.110, p. 669-96, 2000.

BEITZ, Charles. Justice and International Relations.In: POGGE, Thomas; MOELLENDORF, Darrel(eds.). Global justice–seminal essays. St. Paul: Paragon House, 2008, p. 21-48.

BLAKE, Michael. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, p. 257-96, 2001.

BROCK,GILLIAN .Global fustice–a cosmopolitan account. Oxford: Oxford, 2009.Unviersity Press).

BUCHANAN, Allen. Rules for a vanished westphalian order. Ethics, v.110, p. 697-721, 2000.

BUCHANAN, Allen. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: moral foundations for international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

BUCHANAN, Allen. 2006. “International law, philosophy of.In: CRAIG, Edward (ed.). Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy.London: Routledge, 2006.

CANEY, Simon. Justicebeyond borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

CARENS, Joseph. Aliens and citizens: the case for open borders. The Review of Politics, v.49, p. 251-73, 1987.

COHEN, Joshua ; SABEL, Charles.Extra rempublicamnullajustitia?Philosophy & Public Affairs,v.34, p. 147-75, 2006.

DWORKIN, Ronald. What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs,v.10, p. 283-345, 1981.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000..

FOLLESDAL, Andreas; POGGE, Thomas(eds.).Real world justice. Dordrecht: Springer, [s.d], p. 27-37.

FORST, Rainer. Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994.

FORST, Rainer. Tworads a critical theory of transnational justice. Metaphilosophy, v.32, p. 160-179, 2001.

FORST, Rainer. Justice, Morality and power in the global context. In:Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung.Frankfurt.: Suhrkamp, 2007a.

FORST, Rainer. Radical justice: on Iris Young’s critique of the distributive paradigm. Constellations, v. 14, n. 2, p. 260–65, 2007b.

FLIKSCHUH, Katrin. The idea of philosophical fieldwork: global justice, moral ignorance, intellectual attitudes. Journal of Political Philosophy,v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2014.

FRASER, Nancy. Scales of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.GOSEPATH, Stefan. The global scope of justice. Metaphilosophy,v. 32, p. 135-159, 2001.

FRASER, Nancy. Gleiche Gerechtigkeit.Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2004.

HOBBES, Thomas. Leviathan.New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1962.

JULIUS, A. J. Nagel’s atlas.Philosophy&Public Affairsv. 34, p. 176-92, 2006.

KLEINGELD, Pauline ; BROWN,Eric. Cosmopolitanism.In:ZALTA, Edward(ed.).The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.URL, 2009. = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/cosmopolitanism/.

MILLER. David. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

MILLER, RichardW.Cosmopolitan respect and patriotic concern.Philosophy & Public Affairsv. 27, p. 202-24, 1998.

NAGEL, Thomas. The problem of global justice.Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 33, p. 113-47, 2005.

O’NEILL, Onora. Faces of Hunger. London: Allen and Unwin, 1986.

O’NEILL, Onora. Transnational Justice.In:HELD, David (ed.). Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991, p. 276–304.

O’NEILL, Onora. 2004. “Global Justice: Whose Obligations?” In:CHATTERJEE, Deen(ed.).The Ethics of Assistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 242-59.

POGGE, Thomas. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethicsv. 103, p. 48-75, 1992.

RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

RAWLS, John. The Law of Peoples.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

RAWLS, John. Justice as Fairness–a restatement. ed. Erin Kelly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

RAZ,Joseph. The Moralityof Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

SCANLON, Thomas. Contractarianism and Utilitarianism.In: SEN, Amartya; WILLIAMS, Bernard (eds.).Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

SCANLON, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

SCHEFCZYK, Michael. Rawls und die Verantwortung von nationen. In:BECCHI, PAOLO ET AL.(eds.).Nationen und Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2007, p. 7-32.

TASIOULAS,John. Global justice withouht end?Metaphilosophyv. 36, p. 1-29, 2005.

WOLLNER, Gabriel. The third wave of theorizing global justice. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric v. 6, p. 21-39, 2013.

YOUNG,Iris. Global challenges. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-05

Issue

Vol. 40 No. 2 (2013)

Section

Artigos Variados

License

A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizes

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

  2. Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

Licença Creative Commons
Esta revista está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.