Political vocations
Keywords:
differànce, liberalism, identity, language, discourseAbstract
My intention with this article is to suggest that that Derrida's notion of différance provides an interesting tool to bridge a gap in political liberalism. Focusing on the contemporary reading of liberalism, I expose the Kantian transformation of political philosophy, identifying the establishment of a reflexive-normative view-from-nowhere where in in multiple conceptions of good are pacified by Reason. A phenomenological reading of political liberalism, in this context, allows me to recast the problem of political signification and identity under a different light, suggesting that the Husserlian exposition of an ethical-political core in language complements the formal gap in liberalism.References
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Potentialities:collected essays in philosophy. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
ARISTOTLE. De interpretatione. In:BARNES, Jonathan (ed). The complete works of Aristotle: the revised Oxford translation.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Volume one, p. 25-39.
ARISTOTLE. On the soul. In:BARNES, Jonathan (ed). The complete works of Aristotle: the revised Oxford translation.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Volume one, p. 641-69.
ARISTOTLE. Politics.In:BARNES, Jonathan (ed). The complete works of Aristotle: the revisedOxford translation.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Volume two, p. 1986-2130.
ARISTOTLE. Nicomachean Ethics.Translated by Christopher Rowe and Introduction and commentary by Christopher Rowe and Sarah Broadie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
DERRIDA, Jacques. Voice and phenomenon. Translation by Leonard Lawlor, to be published in 2010
DERRIDA, Jacques. On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness.London : Routledge, c2001.
DERRIDA, Jacques. Adieu à Emmanuel Levinas. Paris: Galilée, 1997.
GAY, Peter. The enlightenment: an interpretation.New York: Vintage, 1966.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. The divided west. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.
HOBBES, Thomas.Leviathan. In:MORGAN, Michael (ed.). Classics of moral and political theory(Fourth Edition). Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company, 2005. p. 548-682.
HONNETH, Axel. Disrespect: the normative foundations of critical theory.Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Logical investigations. New York: Routledge, 2001.volume 1.
KANT, Immanuel. Critica da razão prática.[Bilingualedition with translation, introduction and notens by Valério Rohden]. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
OLIVEIRA, Nythamar Fernandes de. Tractatus ethico-politicus.Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 1998.
RAWLS, John. Justice as fairness: a restatement,. Ed. Erin Kelly. Harvard University Press, 2001.
RAWLS, John. Lectures on the history of moral philosophy.Ed. Barbara Herman. Harvard University Press, 2000.
RAWLS, John. The law of peoples: with "the idea of public reason revisited". Cambridge : Harvard University Press, c1999.
RAWLS, John. A theory of justice.Cambridge : Harvard University Press, c1999.
RAWLS, John. Political liberalism.New York, NY : Columbia University Press, c1996.
ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on the origin of inequalityIn:MORGAN, Michael (ed.). Classics ofmoral and political theory(Fourth Edition). Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company, 2005. p. 777-831.
ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. On the social contract. In:MORGAN, Michael (ed.). Classics of moral and political theory(Fourth Edition). Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company, 2005. p. 831-893.
STEIN, Ernildo. Antropologia filosófica.Ijuí: Editora Unijuí, 2009.
STEINBOCK, Anthony J. Home and beyond.Evanston: Northewestern University Press, 1995.
WEBER, Max. Politics as vocation.In:MORGAN, Michael (ed.). Classics of moral and political theory(Fourth Edition). Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company, 2005.p. 1213-1249.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizesAutores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

Esta revista está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.