Posidonius' cosmology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2020.248333

Keywords:

Stoic cosmology, posidonius, peripatetic physics.

Abstract

Posidonius incorporated important concepts of Peripatetic physics into his system. Posidonius adopted a finitist cosmological model where the extra- cosmic void was not infinite but just as large as the cosmos’ size at the time of the conflagration (F 84/97a E ̶ K). He accepted the idea that there are ab- solute directions towards which the elements naturally tend to move and in which they will naturally remain (F 93 E ̶ K). Similarly, Posidonius concei- ved the four elements as interactive given the new relationship of mutual contrariety, and adopted a physicalist approach where the hot elements are active (F 93, F 101 E ̶ K). The analysis of the long fragments preserved in Strabo (F 229 E ̶ K) and Priscianus Lydus (F 219 E ̶ K) has further shown the significance of heat as an active power in Posidonius’ physics.

References

Algra, K. (1988) ‘The Early Stoics on the Immobility and Coherence of theCosmos’. Phronesis, Vol. 33: No. 2, 155-180.

Algra, K. (1993) ‘Posidonius’ conception of the extra-cosmic void: theevidence and the arguments’. Mnemosyne 46: Fasc. 4, pp. 473-505 (1995)Concepts of space in Greek thought. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Bowen, A. and Wildberg, C. (2009) New perspectives on Aristotle's Decaelo. Leiden: Brill.

Bywater, I. (1886) Prisciani Lydi quae extant: Metaphrasis inTheophrastum et Solutionum ad Chosroem liber. Berlim: Typis et impensisGeorgii Reimer.

Furley, D. (1966) ‘Lucretius and the Stoics’. Bulletin of the Institute ofClassical Studies 13: 13−33.

Furley, D. (1995) ‘Some Points about Stoic Dynamics’. Proceedings of theBoston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Leiden: Brill. 57−81.

Gill, M. L. (2009) ‘The Theory of the Elements in De Caelo 3 and 4’. InBowen, A. and Wildberg, C. (eds.) 139−61.

Gottschalk, H. B. (1961) ‘The Authorship of Meteorologica, Book IV’. TheClassical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 11, No. 1.

Hahm, D. E. (1977) The origins of Stoic cosmology. [Columbus]: Ohio StateUniversity Press.

Hahm, D. E. (1985) ‘The Stoic Theory of Change’. In R. E. Epp (ed.)Spindel Conference 1984: recovering the Stoics. Memphis, Tenn.: MemphisState University, 39-56.

Hankinson, J. (2002/3) ‘Xenarchus, Alexander and Simplicius on NaturalMotions, Bodies and Magnitudes’. Bulletin of the Institute of ClassicalStudies 46: 19−42.

Hine, H. M. (1981). An edition with commentary of Seneca, Naturalquestions, book two. New York: Arno Press.Hine, H. M. (2010). Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Natural Questions. Chicagoand London: The University of Chicago Press.

Mueller, I. (2009) On Aristotle on the heavens 3.7-4.6. Simplicius of Cilicia.London : Duckworth

Jacoby, F. (1961) Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (FGrH),zweiter Teil: A 87, Poseidonios von Apameia. Leiden.

Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius: The Commentary (vols. i and ii). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Kidd, I. G. (1999) Posidonius: The translation of the Fragments.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kupreeva, I. (2009) ‘Stoic Themes in Peripatetic Sources?’ In Salles (ed.):135−69.

Long. A. A. and Sedley D, N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers (vols. iand ii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mathen, M. (2009) ‘Why does Earth move to the centre? An Examination ofsome Explanatory Strategies in Aristotle’s Cosmology’. In Bowen, A. andWildberg, C. (eds.): 119−38.

Mansfeld, J. (1971). The Pseudo-Hippocratic Tract ch. I-ΠερὶἙβδομάδωνXI and Greek Philosophy. Assen.

Mansfeld, J. (1983) ‘Zeno and Aristotle on Mixture’. Mnemosyne, FourthSeries, Vol. 36, Fasc. 3/4.

Reydams-Schils, G. (1997). ‘Posidonius and the Timaeus: Off to Rhodesand back to Plato?’ CQ, N.S. 47, 2: 455-476.Salles, R. (editor) (2009) God and cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Salles, R. (2009) ‘Chrysippus on Conflaration and the Indestructibility ofthe Cosmos’. In Salles (ed.): 118 34.

Sambursky, S. (1956) The physical world of the Greeks. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul.

Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics. Cambridge : CambridgePhilological Society

Sedley, D. N. (1992) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the atomist criteria of truth’.Elenchos 13: 19-56.

Sedley, D. N. (2007) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley;London: University of California Press.

Sharples, R. (1998) Theophrastus of Eresus : sources for his life, writings,thought, and influence. Leiden; Boston: Brill

Solmsen, F. (1960) Aristotle's system of the physical world: a comparisonwith his predecessors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press

Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, space, and motion: theories in antiquity and theirsequel. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Steinmetz, P. (1962) ‘Zur Erdbebentheorie de Poseidonios’. RheinischeMuseum für Philologie: 261−63.

Stocks, J. L. (1930) The works of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Taub, L. (2003) Ancient meteorology. London: Routledge.

Todd, R. (1976) Alexander of Aphrodisias on stoic physics: a study of theDe mixtione with preliminary essays, text, translation and commentary.Leiden : Brill

Todd, R. (1978) ‘Monism and Immanence: Foundations of the Stoicprinciples’. In J. Rist (ed.), the Stoics. Berkeley, Calif.: University ofCalifornia Press: 137−60.

Van Raalte, M. (2010) ‘The Nature of Fire and Its Complications:Theophrastus’ De Igne 1 10’. −Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies.Volume 53. Issue 1: 47−97.

White, S. (2007). ‘Posidonius and Stoic Physics’. In R. Sorabji and R. W.Sharples (eds.) Greek and Roman philosophy, 100 BC - 200 AD (2 vols.).London: University of London, School of Advanced Study, Institute ofClassical Studies: 35−76.

Williams, G. D. (2012) The Cosmic Viewpoint: a study of Seneca’s Naturalquestions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-23

Issue

Section

Dossiê Estoicismo