Another brick in the wall: Threats to our autonomy as sense-makers when dealing with machine learning systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2022.252618

Keywords:

autonomy, enactivism, machine learning, sense-making, participatory sense-making

Abstract

Autonomy, as proposed by the enactive approach to cognition, is the capacity that living organisms have to follow norms constituted by their own activity. This concept is linked to the concepts of sense-making and participatory sense-making, the former encapsulating the cognizer's ability to bring forth a world of meaning through its coupling with the environment – and being affected by its surroundings on an ongoing basis – and the latter being an extension of this idea, which applies to interactive processes in which at least two agents find themselves involved in. In this essay I advocate that, when dealing with machine learning systems, which cannot be considered autonomous, the agent or cognizer cannot sustain his or her autonomy in the same way as would be possible in an encounter with another agent. The reasoning is developed in three threads: the unbalanced encounter in which the cognizer's autonomy is threatened; the reduction of the range of experiences an autonomous agent could have; the lack of awareness of the cognizer concerning rules and potential risks of the systems he is dealing with. Even though these risks are focused on in the essay, the opportunities offered by machine learning systems are also recognized. To take advantage of them, it is necessary to seek a balance that encompasses the inherent human capacity for intersubjectivity permeated by affectivity.

Author Biography

Camila de Paoli Leporace, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade de Coimbra

Doutoranda no Departamento de Educação da PUC-Rio e na Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra (linha de pesquisa: Filoosfia da Educação).

References

BANNELL, R. Uma faca de dois gumes. In: FERREIRA, Giselle dos Santos. Educação e Tecnologia: abordagens críticas. Rio de Janeiro: SESES, 2017.

BROOKS, R. A. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159, 1991.

CLARK, A. Mindware. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.

COECKELBERGH, M. AI Ethics. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2020.

DE JAEGHER, H. e DI PAOLO, E. A. Participatory Sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and Cognitive the Sciences, 6, pp. 485-507, 2007.

DE JAEGHER, H. e DI PAOLO, E. A. Making Sense in Participation: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition. In: Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective on the Study of Interactions. F. Morganti, A. Carassa, G. Riva (Eds.) Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 33-47, 2008.

DEWEY, J. The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 1, 1925 - 1953: 1925, Experience and Nature. 1ª ed. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.

Di PAOLO, E. Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 4, 429–452, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y

DI PAOLO, E. Extended Life. Topoi 28, 9, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3

DI PAOLO, E. A., BURHMANN, T. E BARANDIARAN, X, E. Sensorimotor Life. An Enactive Proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

DI PAOLO, E. A.; CUFFARI, E. C. & DE JAEGHER, H. Linguistic Bodies. The Continuity between Life and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.

DI PAOLO, E. A. Enactive becoming. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–27, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09654 -1

DI PAOLO, E., ROHDE, M. & DE JAEGHER. Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play. In: Stewart, J., Gapenne, O. e Di Paolo, E. Enaction – Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.

DI PAOLO, E. e THOMPSON, E. The enactive approach. In: SHAPIRO, L. The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 86-96, 2014.

DREYFUS, H. What Computers Still Can’t Do. MIT Press: New York, NY, USA: 1992.

DREYFUS, H. Skillful Coping – Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

GIBSON, J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press, 1986.

JOHNSON, M. The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.

JOHNSON, M. Embodied mind, meaning and reason - how our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.

JOHNSON, M. The aesthetics of meaning and thought – the bodily roots of Philosophy, Science, Morality and Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.

HOLMES, W., BIALIK, M. e FADEL, C. Artificial Intelligence in Education – Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: The Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.

HURLEY, S. Perception And Action: Alternative Views. Synthese 129, 3–40, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012643006930

MATURANA, H. e VARELA, F. Autopoiesis and Cognition. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 42. Springer, Dordercht, 1980.

MATURANA, H. e VARELA, F. A Árvore do Conhecimento – As bases biológicas da compreensão humana. São Paulo: Palas Athena, 2019.

O’NEIL, C. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown, 2016.

ROHDE, M. Enaction, Embodiment, Evolutionary Robotics. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2010.

SHEETS-JOHNSTONE, M. Thinking in Movement: Further Analyses and Validations. In: Enaction – Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.

STEWART, J., GAPENNE, O. e DI PAOLO, E. Enaction – Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.

THOMPSON, E. Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

VARELA, F., THOMPSON, E. and ROSCH, E. The Embodied Mind – Cognitive Science and Human Experience.

VÉLIZ, C. Moral Zombies: Why Algorithms Are Not Moral Agents. AI and Society 36 (2): 487–97, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01189-x.

ZAHAVI, D. A fenomenologia e o(s) problema(s) da intersubjetividade. In Bannell, R. I., Mizrahi, M., Martins dos Santos Ferreira, G. (Orgs.) (Des)educando a educação: Mentes, Materialidades e Metáforas. Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio, 2021.

ZEBROWSKI, R. L., e McGRAW, E. Autonomy and Openness in Human and Machine Systems: Participatory Sense-Making and Artificial Minds. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness 08 (02): 303–23, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078521500181.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-12

Issue

Section

Dossiê “Fenomenologia, Ação, Cognição e Afetividade”