From Doubt to Despair
a Wittgensteinian Perspective on Gaslighting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2025.265931Keywords:
scepticism, despair, gaslighting, epistemic injustice, On Certainty, kinds of doubtAbstract
‘Gaslighting’ describes a form of manipulation that induces doubt in someone’s perceptions, experiences, understanding of events or conception of reality in general. But what kind of doubt is it? How do ‘ordinary’ epistemic doubts differ from those doubts that can lead to despair and the feeling of losing one’s mind? The phenomenon of ‘gaslighting’ has been attracting public attention for some time and has recently found its way into philosophical reflec-tions that address moral, sexist and epistemic aspects of gaslighting. Little has been said, however, about the nature of gaslighting-induced doubts themselves, how they differ from ordinary, even ‘reasonable’ epistemic (self-) doubts and how it can come to someone doubting their own perception and conception of reality in the first place.The aim of this paper is to shed some light on these aspects by drawing on some of Wittgenstein’s remarks on doubt, published mainly in On Certainty. To this end, I will first outline the phenomenon of gaslighting as an epistemic injustice before presenting Wittgenstein’s reflections on doubt(ing). These will then be applied to the phenomenon of gaslighting, with a more specific focus on the evocation of such fundamental self-doubt in successful gaslighting, again drawing on some of Wittgenstein’s remarks.
References
ABRAMSON, K. Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting. Philosophical Perspectives, New Jersey, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1-30, dec. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12046
KLEINERDREI. Gaslighting: subtiler Missbrauch. Kleinerdrei, [s.l.], 2016. Disponível em: http://kleinerdrei.org/2016/10/gaslighting-subtiler-psychischer-missbrauch/, acesso realizado em: 28 dezembro 2021.
APA DICTIONARY OF PSYCHOLOGY. “Gaslight”. In: APA Dictionary of Psychology. Washington, D.C., 2023. Disponível em: https://dictionary.apa.org/gaslight. Acesso em: 29 fev. 2024.
CALEF, V.; WEINSHEL, E. Some Clinical Consequences of Introjection: Gaslighting. Psychoanalytic Quaterly, Oxford, v. 50, n.1, p. 44–66, nov. 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1981.11926942
CATAPANG PODOSKY, P. Gaslighting, First- and Second-Order. Hypathia, Cambridge, v. 36, n.1, p. 207-227, dec. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2020.54
CAVELL, S. Contesting Tears: The Hollywood Melodrama of the Unknown Woman. 1 ed. Chicago: USP, 1996. 272 p.
COLIVA, A. Stebbing, Moore (and Wittgenstein) on Common Sense and Metaphysical Analysis. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Londres, v. 29, n. 5, p. 914-934, jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2021.1936447
DESCARTES, R. Meditations of First Philosophy. Tradução: Michael Moriarty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 336. (MPP)
FRICKER, M. Epistemic Injustice: Power and Ethics of Knowing. 1 ed. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 208.
FRICKER, M. Evolving Concepts of Epistemic Injustice. In: KIDD, I.; MEDINA, J.; POHLHAUS G. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Epistemic Injustice. 1 ed. Londres: Routledge, 2016. cap. 4, p. 53-60.
GHITIS, F. Donald Trump is ‘Gaslighting’ All of Us. CNN, Atlanta, 10 de jan. 2017. Disponível em: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/10/opinions/donald-trump-is-gaslighting-america-ghitis/index.html. Acessado: 20 de dezembro, 2021.
JUNGNITZ, L.; et al. Gewalt gegen Männer: Personale Gewaltwiderfahrnisse von Männern in Deutschland. 1 ed. Leverkusen: Budrich Verlag, 2007.
LENZ, H.-J. Mann versus Opfer? Kritische Männerforschung zwischen der Verstrickung in herrschende Verhältnisse und einer neuen Erkenntnisperspektive. In: BauSteine-Männer (eds.). Kristische Männerforschung: Neue Ansätze in der Geschlechtertheorie. 3 ed.
Hamburg: Argument Verlag mit Ariadne. p. 359-296.
McKINNON, R. Allies Behaving Badly: Gaslighting as Epistemic Injustice. In: KIDD, I.; MEDINA, J.; POHLAUS, G. (eds). The Routledge Companion to Epistemic Injustice. 1 ed. Londres: Routledge, 2016. cap. 15, p. 167-174.
MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. Wittgenstein on Psychological Certainty. In: MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. (ed.). Perspicuous Presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology. 1 ed. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. cap. 11, p. 211-235.
MOORE, G. Defence of the Common Sense. In: MUIRHEAD, H. (ed.). Contemporary British Philosophy. 1 ed. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1925. cap. 7, p. 192-233.
MOORE, G. Proof of an External World. In: MOORE, G. Philosophical Papers. 1 ed. Nova Iorque: Collier Books, 1962. p. 144-148.
PITZKE, M. Im Spiegelkabinett der Lügen. Spiegel, Hamburg, 21, março, 2017. Disponível em:
https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/donald-trump-und-das-fbi-im-spiegelkabinett-der-luegen-a-1139684.html. Acesso em: 20/12/2021
RHEES, R (eds). Wittgenstein’s ‘On Certainty’. There –Like Our Life. 1 ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. p. 208
SANCHEZ CURRY, D. Cabbage à la Descartes. Ergo, Ann Arbor, v.3, n. 24, 2016. p. 609–637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.024
SCHULTE, J. Wittgenstein: Eine Einführung. 2 ed. Ditzingen: Reclam, 2016a. p. 264.
SCHULTE, J. Wittgenstein’s Last Writings. In: RINOFNER-KREIDL, S.; WILTSCHE, H. (eds.). Analytical and Continental Philosophy:
Proceedings of the 37th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Berlin: DeGruyter, 2016. cap. 4, p. 63-76.
SPEAR, A. Epistemic Dimensions of Gaslighting: Peer-Disagreement, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Injustice. Inquiry, v. 66, n. 1, p. 1–24, abr.
2019.
STARK, C. Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Psychological Oppression. The Monist, Oxford, v. 102, n. 2, p. 221–235, abril, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz007.
STEBBING, S. The method of Analysis in Metaphysics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Oxford, v. 33, n. 1, p. 53-87, junho, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/33.1.65
STERN, R. The Gaslight Effect: How to Spot and Survive the Hidden Manipulations Other People Use to Control Your Life. Nova Iorque: Morgan Road, 2007. p. 288.
SWEET, P. The Sociology of Gaslighting. American Sociological Review, Thousand Oaks, v. 84, n. 5, p. 851-875, setembro, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843
TRÄCHTLER, J. Wittgensteins Grammatik des Fremdseelischen. 1 ed. Berlin: J.B. Metzler, 2022a.
TRÄCHTLER, J. Hinges of Trust: Wittgenstein on the Other Minds Problem. In: MOYAL-SHARROCK, D.; SANDIS, C. (eds.). Extending Hinge Epistemology.Londres, Anthem Studies in Wittgenstein, 2022b. cap. 6, p. 109-124.
WEIBERG, A. Zweifeln können und zweifeln wollen: ‘Über Gewißheit’§ 217–231. In: KANZIAN, C.; KLETZL, S.; MITTERER, J.; NEGES, K. Realism –Relativism –Constructivism: Proceedings of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg. Berlin: DeGruyter, 2017. cap. 6/33 p. 435-448.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Remarks on Colour. G. E. M. Anscombe (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell,1979. (ROC)
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Culture and Value. G.H. v. WRIGHT; H. NYMAN (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. (CV)
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology Vol. I. GEORG H. VON WRIGHT; HEIKKI NYMAN (eds.),Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. (LW I)
WITTGENSTEIN, L. On Certainty. G.E.M. ANSCOMBE; G.H. V. WRIGHT (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. (OC)
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology Vol. II. G.H. v. Wright; H. Nyman (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. (RPP II)
ZEMON GASS, G.; NICHOLS, W. Gaslighting: A Marital Syndrome. Contemporary Family Therapy, Londres, v. 10, n. 1, p. 3-16, março, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922429.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Toma Gheorghe Tavares de Melo, Fábio Praxedes, Marcos Silva; Jasmin Trächtler

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://memoria2.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizes/
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
-
Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
-
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

As obras publicadas pela Revista Perspectiva Filosófica estão licenciadas com Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.








