Logical realism and the metaphysics of logic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2018.242293Palabras clave:
logical realismResumen
Traduction.Citas
Armstrong, D. M. A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583308
Barnes, E. Ontic Vagueness: A Guide for the Perplexed. Noûs, v. 44, n. 4, p.601–627, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00762.x
Barnes, E., & Williams, J. R. G. A Theory of Metaphysical Indeterminacy. InK. Bennett, & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics6 (p. 103–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603039.003.0003
Beall, J. C., & Restall, G. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2006.
Burge, T. Frege on Knowing theThird Realm. Mind, v. 101, n. 404, p. 633–650,1992. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/101.404.633
Carnap, R. mpiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Revue Internationale de hilosophie, v. 4,p.20–40, 1950.
Cook, R. Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom: A Tour of Logical Pluralism.Philosophy Compass, v.4, n.6, p.492–504,2010.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00286.x
Cover, J., & O'Leary‐Hawthorne, J. A World of Universals. Philosophical Studies,v. 91, p. 205–219, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004276510940
Evnine, S. (ms). Frege on the Relations between Logic and Thought.
Frege, G. Thought. Re-impresso em (1997). In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Frege Reader(p. 325–345). Oxford: Blackwell, 1918.
Hirsch. Quantifier variance and realism: Essays in Metaontology. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2010.
Hirsch, E. Ontology and Alternative Languages. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, &R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations ofontology (p. 383–423). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Hjortland, O. T. Anti‐Exceptionalism About Logic. Philosophical Studies, v. 174,p. 631–658, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11098-016-0701-8
Husserl, E. In D. Moran (Ed.), J.N. Findlay (Tr.) Logical Investigations (ed., Vol.1. Re-impresso em (2000)). London: Routledge, 1900.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420034
Jenkins, C. Naturalism and Norms of Inference. In O. Flanagan, & A.Fairweather (Eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue (p. 53–69). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236348.004
Lapointe, S. Bolzano's Logical Realism. In P. Rush (Ed.), The metaphysics of logic(p. 189–208).
Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626279.014
Leech, J. Logic and the Laws of Thought. Philosophers' Imprint, v. 15, 2015.
Maddy, P. A Second Philosophy of Logic. In P. Rush(Ed.), The metaphysics oflogic (p. 93–108).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626279.007
Maddy, P. A Second Philosophy of Logic. In P. Rush (Ed.), The metaphysics oflogic (p.93–108). ambridge: ambridge University Press, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626279.007
McSweeney, M. M. Following Logical Realism Where it Leads. PhilosophicalStudies, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-1008-0
Mulligan, K. and Correia, F. Facts. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter2017 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), 2017.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/facts/
Paul, L. A. Logical Parts. Noûs, v. 36, p. 578–596, 2002.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00402
Priest, G. Doubt truth to be a liar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
Priest, G. Revising Logic. In P. Rush (Ed.), The metaphysics of logic (p. 211–223).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626279.016
Putnam, H. The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. In H. Putnam (Ed.),Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Mathematics, Matter, and Method (p. 130–158).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
Rayo, A. The construction of logical space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662623.001.0001
Read, S. Monism: The One True Logic. In D. de Vidi, & T. Kenyon (Eds.), ALogical Approach to Philosophy: Essays in Memory of Graham Solomon.Switzerland: Springer, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4054-7_10
Resnik, M. Against Logical Realism. History and Philosophy of Logic, v. 20, p. 181–194, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445349950044134
Rush, P. Logical Realism. In P. Rush (Ed.), The metaphysics of logic (p. 13–31).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626279.003
Russell, G. K. Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic.Philosophical Studies, v. 171, p.161–175, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0255-y
Schaffer, J. Monism: The Priority of the Whole. Philosophical Review, v. 119, n. 1,p. 31–76, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2009-025
Sider, T. Ontological Realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman(Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology (p. 383–423). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Sider, T. Writing the book of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 011.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001
Tahko, T. The Law of Non‐Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Australasian Journal of Logic, v. 7, p. 32–47, 2009.https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v7i0.1806
Tahko, T. The Metaphysical Interpretation of Logical Truth. In P. Rush (Ed.),The metaphysics of logic (p. 233–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2014.
Thomasson, A. Ontology made easy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Turner, J. The facts in logical space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682812.001.0001
Williamson, T. Modal logic as metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001
Williamson, T. Semantic Paradoxes and Abductive Methodology. In B.Armour‐Garb (Ed.), Reflections on the liar (p. 325–346). Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2017. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199896042.003.0013
Wyatt, N. What are Beall and Restall Pluralists About? Australasian Journal ofPhilosophy, v. 82, p. 409–420, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659876140
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizesAutores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

Esta revista está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.