O debate causalismo versus simulacionismo em filosofia da memória como negociação metalinguística
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2019.248088Palabras clave:
Causalismo, memória episódica, negociação metalinguística. lembrar. simulacionismo.Resumen
Às vezes, o debate entre causalistas e simulacionistas em filosofia da memória é apresentado de tal modo que parece que apenas o simulacionismo é compatível com a psicologia da memória contemporânea. Contudo, ambas teorias são compatíveis com os fatos descobertos pela ciência. Mas se o debate não é sobre a adequação aos fatos, sobre o que é? Nós propomos que este debate é um caso de negociação metalinguística. Caulistas e simulacionistas aceitam o mesmo conjunto de fatos, mas disputam sobre como devemos definir memória e lembrar.Citas
ADDIS, Donna Rose. Are episodic memories special? On the sameness of remembered and imagined event simulation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 48, n. 2–3, p. 64–88, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03036758.2018.1439071>
ADDIS, Donna Rose et al. Constructive episodic simulation of the future and the past: Distinct subsystems of a core brain network mediate imagining and remembering. Neuropsychologia, v. 47, n. 11, p. 2222–2238, 2009. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393208004223>
ADDIS, Donna Rose; WONG, Alana T.; SCHACTER, Daniel L. Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, v. 45, n. 7, p. 1363–1377, 2007. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393206004131>
ARISTÓTELES. Da memória e da revocação. In: Parva naturalia. São Paulo: Edipro, 2012.
BAKER, Chris. The dynamics of vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1–36, 2002.
BELLERI, Delia. Ontological disputes and the phenomenon of metalinguistic negotiation: Charting the territory. Philosophy Compass, 2020. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phc3.12684>
BERNECKER, Sven. The metaphysics of memory. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
BERNECKER, Sven. Memory: a philosophical study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
BERNECKER, Sven. Visual Memory and the Bounds of Authenticity. In: Mind, Language and Action: proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Berlin, München, Boston: DE GRUYTER, 2015.
BERNECKER, Sven. Memory and truth. In: BERNECKER, Sven; MICHAELIAN, Kourken (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. London: Routledge, 2017a.
BERNECKER, Sven. A Causal Theory of Mnemonic Confabulation. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 8, 2017b. Disponível em: <http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01207/full>
BIRD, Alexander; TOBIN, Emma. Natural Kinds. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2018 ed. [s.l.]: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2018.
DE BRIGARD, Felipe. Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese, v. 191, n. 2, p. 155–185, 2014. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-013-0247-7>
DE BRIGARD, F. et al. Remembering what could have happened: Neural correlates of episodic counterfactual thinking. Neuropsychologia, v. 51, n. 12, p. 2401–2414, 2013. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393213000298>
CARNAP, Rudolf. Empirismo, Semântica e Ontologia. In: MARICONDA, Pablo Rúben (Ed.). Os Pensadores. 3a. ed. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1988. p. 113–28.
CARRUTHERS, Peters. The centered mind: what the science of working memory shows us about the nature of human thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
DEBUS, Dorothea. Accounting for epistemic relevance: A new problem for the causal theory of memory. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 47, n. 1, p. 17–29, 2010.
DEBUS, Dorothea. ‘Mental Time Travel’: Remembering the Past, Imagining the Future, and the Particularity of Events. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, v. 5, n. 3, p. 333–350, 2014. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13164-014-0182-7>
DEUTSCHER, Max. Remembering ‘Remembering’. In: HEIL, John (Ed.). Cause, Mind, and Reality. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1989. p. 53–72.
FERNÁNDEZ, Jordi. Memory: a self-referential account. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
GOODMAN, Nelson. Fact, fiction and forecast. 4a. ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1979.
HACKING, Ian. Ontologia histórica. Tradução Leila Mendes; Alessandro Zir. São Leopoldo: Editora Unisinos, 2009.
HOCHSTEIN, Eric. How metaphysical commitments shape the study of psychological mechanisms. Theory & Psychology, v. 29, n. 5, p. 579–600, 2019. Disponível em: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959354319860591>
JAMES, William. The principles of psychology, vol. I. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1980.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Rápido e devagar: duas formas de pensar. Tradução Cássio de Arantes Leite. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2012.
KITAMURA, Takashi et al. Engrams and circuits crucial for systems consolidation of a memory. Science, v. 356, n. 6333, p. 73–78, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aam6808>
KITSIK, Eve. Explication as a strategy for revisionary philosophy. Synthese, v. 197, n. 3, p. 1035–1056, 2020. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-018-1774-z>
KLEIN, Stanley B. What memory is. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–38, 2015. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/wcs.1333>
LOCKE, Don. Memory. Garden City, NY: ANchor Books, 1971.
MAHR, Johannes B.; CSIBRA, Gergely. Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 41, p. e1, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X17000012/type/journal_article>
MARTIN, Charles Burton; DEUTSCHER, Max. Remembering. The Philosophical Review, v. 75, n. 2, p. 161–96, 1966.
MARTIN, C. B.; HEIL, John. The Ontological Turn. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, v. 23, n. 1, p. 34–60, 1999. Disponível em: <http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=msp_1999_0023_0034_0060&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection>
MCTAGGART, John; MCTAGGART, Ellis; SANTOS, César Schirmer Dos. A irrealidade do tempo. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia, v. 55, n. 130, p. 747–764, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-512X2014000200017&lng=pt&tlng=pt>
MICHAELIAN, Kourken. Mental time travel: episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2016a.
MICHAELIAN, Kourken. Confabulating, Misremembering, Relearning: The Simulation Theory of Memory and Unsuccessful Remembering. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 7, 2016b. Disponível em: <http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01857/full>
MICHAELIAN, Kourken. Confabulating as Unreliable Imagining: In Defence of the Simulationist Account of Unsuccessful Remembering. Topoi, v. 39, n. 1, p. 133–148, 2020. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11245-018-9591-z>
MICHAELIAN, Kourken; DEBUS, Dorothea; PERRIN, Denis. The philosophy of memory today and tomorrow: Editors’ introduction. In: MICHAELIAN, Kourken; DEBUS, Dorothea; PERRIN, Denis (Eds.). New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 1–9.
MICHAELIAN, Kourken; ROBINS, Sarah K. Beyond the causal theory? Fifty years after Martin and Deutscher. In: MICHAELIAN, Kourken; DEBUS, Dorothea; PERRIN, Denis (Eds.). New directions in the philosophy of memory. London: Routledge, 2018. p. 13–32.
MICHAELIAN, Kourken; SUTTON, John. Memory. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2017 ed. [s.l.] : Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017.
MOORE, A. W. The evolution of modern metaphysics: making sense of things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
OKUDA, Jiro et al. Thinking of the future and past: the roles of the frontal pole and the medial temporal lobes. NeuroImage, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1369–1380, 2003. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811903001794>
PERRIN, Denis. Asymmetries in Subjective Time. In: MICHAELIAN, Kourken; KLEIN, Stnaley B.; KARL K. SZPUNAR (Eds.). Seeing the Future: Theoretical Perspectives on Future-Oriented Mental Time Travel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 39–61.
PERRIN, Denis. A Case for Procedural Causality in Episodic Memory. In: MICHAELIAN, Kourken; DEBUS, Dorothea; DENIS PERRIN (Eds.). New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory. London: Routledge, 2018.
PLUNKETT, David; SUNDELL, Tim. Disagreement and the semantics of normative and evaluative terms. Philosopher’s Imprint, v. 13, n. 23, 2013.
POIDEVIN, Robin Le. The images of time: an essay on temporal representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
QUINE, W. V. Sobre o que há. In: De um ponto de vista lógico: nove ensaios lógico-filosóficos. Tradução Antonio Ianni Segatto. São Paulo: UNESP, 2011. p. 11–36.
REESE, Elaine; CLEVELAND, Emily Sutcliffe. Mother-Child Reminiscing and Children’s Understanding of Mind. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, v. 52, n. 1, p. 17–43, 2006. Disponível em: <http://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/merrill-palmer_quarterly/v052/52.1reese.html>
ROBINS, Sarah. Representing the past: memory traces and the causal theory of memory. Philosophical Studies, v. 173, n. 11, p. 2993–3013, 2016. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11098-016-0647-x>
ROBINS, Sarah. Memory traces. In: BERNECKER, Sven; MICHAELIAN, Kourken (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. London: Routledge, 2017.
ROBINS, Sarah. Defending Discontinuism, Naturally. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 469–486, 2020. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13164-020-00462-0>
ROBINS, Sarah K. Biological clocks: explaining with models of mechanisms. In: JOHN BICKLE (Ed.). Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 41–67.
ROWLANDS, Mark. The remembered: understanding the content of episodic memory. In: MICHAELIAN, Kourken; DEBUS, Dorothea; PERRIN, Denis (Eds.). New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 279–93.
BERTRAND, Russell. Os problemas da filosofia. Tradução Jaimir Conte. Florianópolis, 2005a.
RUSSELL, Bertrand. The analysis of mind. London: Routledge, 2005b.
RYLE, Gilbert. The concept of mind: with an introduction by Daniel C. Dennett. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
SANT’ANNA, André. Mental time travel and the philosophy of memory. Filosofia Unisinos, v. 19, n. 1, 2018. Disponível em: <http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/filosofia/article/view/15579>
SANT’ANNA, André; MICHAELIAN, Kourken. Teorias sobre o lembrar: causalismo, simulacionismo e funcionalismo. Voluntas, v. 10, n. 3, p. 8–36, 2019.
SCHACTER, Daniel L.; ADDIS, Donna Rose; BUCKNER, Randy L. Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 8, n. 9, p. 657–661, 2007. Disponível em: <http://www.nature.com/articles/nrn2213>
SCHACTER, Daniel L. et al. Constructive episodic simulation, flexible recombination, and memory errors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 41, p. e32, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X17001510/type/journal_article>
SHANTON, Karen; GOLDMAN, Alvin. Simulation theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, v. 1, n. 4, p. 527–538, 2010. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcs.33>
SIDER, Theodore R. Writing the book of the world. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011.
SPINELLA, Jake. Naturalized metaphysics and scientific constraint: a model-building approach. 2019. Georgia State University, 2019.
STRAWSON, P. F. Indivíduos: um ensaio de metafísica descritiva. Tradução Plínio Junqueira Smith. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2019.
SUDDENDORF, Thomas; CORBALLIS, Michael C. Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, v. 123, n. 2, p. 133–67, 1997.
SUTTON, John. Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
SZPUNAR, Karl K. On subjective time. Cortex, v. 47, n. 3, p. 409–411, 2011. Disponível em: <https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945210001966>
THOMASSON, Amie L. What can we do, when we do metaphysics? In: D’ORO, Giuseppina; OVERGAARD, Soren (Eds.). The Cambridge companion to philosophicla methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017a. p. 101–21.
THOMASSON, Amie L. Metaphysical Disputes and Metalinguistic Negotiation. Analytic Philosophy, v. 58, n. 1, p. 1–28, 2017b. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/phib.12087>
TULVING, Endel. Episodic and semantic memory. In: TULVING, Endel; DONALDSON, Thomas (Eds.). Organization of Memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972. p. 381–402.
TULVING, Endel. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1–12, 1985. Disponível em: <http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/h0080017>
TULVING, Endel. Remembering and knowing the past. American Scientist, v. 77, p. 361–67, 1989.
TULVING, Endel. Episodic Memory: From Mind to Brain. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 53, n. 1, p. 1–25, 2002a. Disponível em: <http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114>
TULVING, Endel. Chronesthesia: Conscious Awareness of Subjective Time. In: Principles of Frontal Lobe Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002b. p. 311–325.
TULVING, Endel; SZPUNAR, Karl K. Does the future exist? In: LEVINE, Brian; CRAIRK, Fergus I. M. (Eds.). Mind and the Frontal Lobes: Cognition, Behavior and Brain Imaging. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 248–63.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizesAutores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

Esta revista está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.