Portuguese judicial system seen as public policy. reasons and justification
Keywords:
Portuguese judicial system, public policy, public policies analysisAbstract
Public policies are complex intervention processes and schemes (macro and / or micro) in society and, consequently, in the life of individuals (or in a smaller group of individuals: communities). This intervention is always based on the resolution of a problem. This resolution may not be verified or may even result in the creation or exponentiation of new or existing problems. But the starting point will always be its solution.In today's society, which is also complex and with multiple actors and agents of change and social, political, economic intervention, etc., it is understood that it is not only the public sector that carries out the intervention referred to above. Often, it may not even be involved in this intervention or be in conjunction with the private and social sectors.The paper understands the judicial system as a public policy, a process of intervention in society, with direct influence on this and on the life of everyone (being in direct or indirect contact with the judicial system), whose main focus is solving problems. In the judicial system,too, the problems are more complex, because they do not only contemplate social aspects, but oftenalso economic, legal, which, not infrequently, also originates in a dispute.This is not intended to be a simplistic analysis of the judicial system, quite the contrary. It is understood that it is an intricate set of networks, relationships, procedures, actors and institutes that, like a cogwheel, all of them will have to be aligned and rotate in the right direction so that the process runs smoothly and, effectively, contributes to solving problems. What is intended is to baste the foundational ideas that, in the understanding of this article, defend the judicial system as a macro public policy, based on classic and current studies of what public policies are and how they can be studied.
References
ARAÚJO, L.; RODRIGUES, M. DE L. Modelos de análise das políticas públicas. Sociologia. Problemas e Práticas, , n. 83, p. 11–35, 2017. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/spp/n83/n83a01.pdf. .
BAPTISTA, J. M. L.; POCINHO, M.; NECHITA, F. Tourism and Public Policy. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V: Economic Sciences, v. 12, n. 1, p. 77–86, 2019. Transilvania University of Brasov, Faculty of Economic Science. Disponível em: http://10.0.124.182/but.es.2019.12.61.1.11. .
BOSWELL, C.; SMITH, K. Rethinking policy ‘impact’: four models of research-policy relations. Palgrave Communications, v. 3, n. 1, p. 44, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0042-z. .
BUCCI, M. P. D. Fundamentos para uma teoria jurídica das políticas públicas. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.
DELAHAIS, T.; LACOUETTE-FOUGÈRE, C. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. Analysis of the contribution of 65 evaluations to the modernisation of public action in France. Evaluation, v. 25, n. 2, p. 131–148, 2019.
DYE, T. R. Mapeamento dos Modelos de Análise de Políticas Públicas. In: F. G. Heidemann; J. F. Salm (Orgs.); Políticas públicas e desenvolvimento: bases epistemológicas e modelos de análise. p.99–129, 2009. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.
FRANÇA, G. DE A. E. O Poder Judiciário e as Políticas Públicas Previdenciárias, 2010. Universidade de São Paulo.
GRAY, A.; JENKINS, B. From Public Administration to Public Management: Reassessing a Revolution? Public Administration, v. 73, n. 1, p. 75–99, 1995. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9508013375&site=eds-live. .
HIGHMAN, L. Remapping French higher education: towards a multi-tiered higher education system? Tertiary Education and Management, 2019.
HOWLETT, M.; RAMESH, M.; ANTHONY, P. Política Pública. Seus ciclos e subsistemas. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2013.
JONES, C. O. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. California: Brooks/Cole, 1984.
KIM, D.-H.; CHOI, Y. S. Modernization of Competition Law and Policy in Egypt: Past, Present and Future. Journal of African Law, 2019.
KOPRIĆ, I. Public administration reform in Croatia: Slow modernization during europeanization of resilient bureaucracy. Public Administration Issues, , n. 5, p. 7–26, 2019.
LASSWELL, H. D. The Analysis of Political Behavior. An Empirical Approach. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948.
PACINO, N. Bringing the Revolution to the Countryside: Rural Health Programmes as State-Building in Post-1952 Bolivia. Bulletin of Latin American Research, v. 38, n. 1, p. 50–65, 2019.
RAMOS, J. Português institucional e comunitário. Disponível em: https://www.instituto-camoes.pt/images/stories/tecnicas_comunicacao_em_portugues/portuges_institucional_e_comunitario/Os Tribunais e o Ministerio Publico.pdf. .
RHONGO, D. L.; DE ALMEIDA, A.; DAVID, N. Analysis of the Adoption and Use of ICT for e-Government Services: The Case of
Mozambique. 2019 IST-Africa Week Conference, IST-Africa 2019. Anais... , 2019.
ROMANO, S. L’Ordinamento Giuridico. Firenze: Sansoni, 1945.
SECCHI, L. Políticas Públicas – Conceitos, Esquemas de Análise, Casos Práticos. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2011.
TONELLI, D. F.; VOICU, M.; ZULEAN, M. Public innovation in post-transition countries: Experiences from Brazil and Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 15, n. Special Is, p. 140–156, 2019.
TORGERSON, D. Promoting the Policy Orientation: Lasswell in Context. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics, and Methods. p.15–28, 2007. Nova Iorque: Routledge. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093192. .
TUDE, J. M.; FERRO, D.; SANTANA, F. P. Políticas Públicas. Curitiba: IEASDE Brasil, 2010.
VECCHI, G. Designing on the past? Administrative reforms in Italy during the last decades: From modernization projects to an incrementalism without strategies | Progettare il passato?: I disegni di riforma amministrativa in Italia negli ultimi decenni: Dalle idee di. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, v. 14, n. 3, p. 383–409, 2019.
