Family planning for men

Wesley Gomes da Silva, Higor Lopes Bernal, Fellipi Nelson Ortiz Cândido, Pedro Paulo Martins Raimundo, Sebastião Junior Henrique Duarte

Abstract


ABSTRACT

Objective: to analyze the access of the male population to family planning methods. Method: this is a descriptive, descriptive, integrative review study, in the period of May, 2018, searching for articles in the last 10 years, in the databases PUBMED / MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science and in the SciELO Virtual Library, presenting the data in figures. We considered the thematic categories that emerged from the Content Analysis Technique after analyzing the articles. Results: 1725 articles were identified, selecting 37, which showed an increase in male participation through vasectomy and the shared decision. It was verified that the low service offer and the low level of orientation on the part of the users are the main factors that imply the participation of the man in the family planning actions. Conclusion: barriers have emerged in the analysis of publications and in the access of men to family planning related to both the poor supply of services and methods, as well as disinformation. Descritores: Family Planning; Vasectomy; Men's Health; Sexual and Reproductive Health; Nursing; Public Health Policies.

RESUMO

Objetivo: analisar o acesso da população masculina aos métodos de planejamento familiar. Método: trata-se de estudo bibliográfico, descritivo, de revisão integrativa, no período de maio de 2018, realizando-se buscas de artigos nos últimos 10 anos, nas bases de dados PUBMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science e na Biblioteca Virtual SciELO, apresentando-se os dados em figuras. Consideraram-se as categorias temáticas que emergiram da Técnica de Análise de Conteúdo após a análise dos artigos. Resultados: identificaram-se 1725 artigos, selecionando-se 37, que evidenciaram o aumento da participação masculina por meio da vasectomia e da decisão compartilhada. Constatou-se que, a baixa oferta de serviço e o baixo nível de orientação por parte dos usuários configuram-se como principais fatores que implicam negativamente a participação do homem nas ações de planejamento familiar. Conclusão: revelaram-se barreiras na análise das publicações e no acesso de homens ao planejamento familiar relacionadas tanto pela pouca oferta de serviços e métodos, como pela desinformação. Descritores: Planejamento Familiar; Vasectomia; Saúde do Homem; Saúde Sexual e Reprodutiva; Enfermagem; Políticas Públicas de Saúde.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: analizar el acceso de la población masculina a los métodos de planificación familiar. Método: se trata de un estudio bibliográfico, descriptivo, de revisión integrativa, en el período de mayo de 2018, realizándose búsquedas de artículos en los últimos 10 años, en las bases de datos PUBMED / MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science y en la Biblioteca Virtual SciELO, presentando los datos en figuras. Se consideraron las categorías temáticas que surgieron de la Técnica de Análisis de Contenido después del análisis de los artículos. Resultados: se identificaron 1725 artículos, seleccionándose 37, que evidenciaron el aumento de la participación masculina por medio de la vasectomía y de la decisión compartida. Se constató que la baja oferta de servicio y el bajo nivel de orientación por parte de los usuarios se configuran como principales factores que implican negativamente la participación del hombre en las acciones de planificación familiar. Conclusión: se revelaron barreras en el análisis de las publicaciones y en el acceso de hombres a la planificación familiar relacionadas tanto por la poca oferta de servicios y métodos, como por la desinformación. Descritores: Planificación Familiar; vasectomía; Salud del Hombre; Salud Sexual y Reproductiva; Enfermería; Políticas Públicas de Salud.

Keywords


Vasectomia; Saúde do Homem; Saúde Sexual e Reprodutiva; Enfermagem; Políticas Publicas de Saúde.

References


Lei nº 9.263 de 12 de janeiro de 1996 (BR). Regula o § 7º do art. 226 da Constituição Federal, que trata do planejamento familiar, estabelece penalidades e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da Uni]ao [Internet]. 1996 Jan 12 [cited 2018 June 15]. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9263.htm

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher 2006: dimensões do processo reprodutivo e da saúde da criança [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009 [cited 2018 July 15]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pnds_crianca_mulher.pdf

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde do Homem [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008 [cited 2018 June 18]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/politica_nacional_atencao_saude_homem.pdf

Nações Unidas Brasil. Transformando Nosso Mundo: a Agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável [Internet]. Brasília: ONUBrasil; 2015 [cited 2018 Mar 18]. Available from: https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/agenda2030-pt-br.pdf

Duarte GA. Male perspectives on contraceptive methods. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2018 Apr 18];14 (Suppl 1):125–30. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/%0D/csp/v14s1/1348.pdf

Soares CB, Hoga LAK, Peduzzi M, Sangaleti C, Yonekura T, Silva DRAD. Integrative review: concepts and methods used in nursing descriptors Integrative review: concepts and methods used in nursing CritiCal review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Apr;48(2):335–45. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-6234201400002000020

Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Integrative literature review: a research method to incorporate evidence in health care and nursing. Texto contexto-enferm. 2008 Oct/Dec;17(4):758–64. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018

Oyugi B, Kioko U, Kaboro SM, Gikonyo S, Okumu C, Ogola-munene S, et al. Accessibility of long-term family planning methods : a comparison study between Output Based Approach (OBA) clients verses non-OBA clients in the voucher supported facilities in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar;17(1):236. Doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2164-9

Hardee K, Croce-Galis M, Gay J. Are men well served by family planning programs ? Reprod Healt. 2017 Jan ;14:14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5

Shattuck D, Perry B, Packer C, Quee DC. A review of 10 years of vasectomy programming and research in low-resource settings. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2016 Dec;4(4):647–60. Doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235

Osis MJD, Carvalho LEC, Cecatti JG, Bento SF, Pádua KS. Provision of voluntary surgical sterilization in the Campinas Metropolitan Area, São Paulo State, Brazil: perceptions of public health services managers and professionals. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009 Mar;25(3):625–34. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009000300017

Bocanegra HT, Riedel JC, Menz M, Darney PD, Brindis CD. Onsite provision of specialized contraceptive services: does title X funding enhance access? J Women’s Heal. 2014 May;23(5):428–33. Doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4511

Marchi NM, Alvarenga AT, Osis MJ, Godoy HMA, Domeni MFSS, Bahamondes L. Vasectomy within the public health services in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Int Nurs Rev. 2010 June;57(2):254–9. Doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00761.x

Zordo S. Programming the body, planning reproduction, governing life : the‘(ir-) rationality’ of family planning and the embodiment of social inequalities in Salvador da Bahia (Brazil). Anthropol Med. 2012;19(2):207–23. Doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.675049

Jacobstein R. Long-Acting and Permanent Contraception : an International Development, Service Delivery Perspective. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2015 July/Aug;52(4):361–7. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.01.001

Vernon R, Solórzano J, Muñoz B. Introducing sustainable vasectomy services in Guatemala. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007 Dec;33(4):182–8. Doi: 10.1363/ifpp.33.182.07

Carvalho LEC, Osis MJD, Cecatti JG, Bento SF, Manfrinati MB. Voluntary surgical sterilization in Greater Metropolitan Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil, before and after legal regulation of the procedure. Cad Saúde Pública. 2007 Dec;23(12):2906–16. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007001200012

Marchi NM, Alvarenga AT, Osis MJ, Bahamondes L. Contraceptive methods with male participation : a perspective of Brazilian couples. Int Nurs Rev. 2008 Mar;(55):103–9. Doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00572.x

Sahin NH. Male university students ’ views , attitudes and behaviors towards family planning and emergency contraception in Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008 June;34(3):392–8. PMID: 18686357

Vieira EM, Souza L. The satisfaction with surgical sterilization provision among the users of the unified health system in a city of São Paulo state. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;14(4):556–64. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2011000400003

Asare O, Otupiri E, Apenkwa J, Odotei-Adjei R. Perspectives of urban Ghanaian women on vasectomy. Reprod Health. 2017 Feb;14(1):21. Doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0286-5

Adongo PB, Tapsoba P, Phillips JF, Tabong PTN, Stone A, Kuffour E, et al. “If you do vasectomy and come back here weak , I will divorce you” : a qualitative study of community perceptions about vasectomy in Southern Ghana. BMC Int Heal Hum Right. 2014;14:16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-14-16

Awonuga OM, Oluwatosin AO, Awonuga DO. Male involvement in family planning among civil servants in Ibadan, South Western Nigeria. West African J Nurs. 2014 May;25(1):1–13.

Kabagenyi A, Jennings L, Reid A, Nalwadda G, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services : a qualitative study of men and women ’ s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda. Reprod Health. 2014 Mar;11(1):21. Doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-21

Hosseini H, Abdi F. Experiences of vasectomy : a phenomenological study. N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Dec;4(12):619–23. Doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.104311

Zareen H, Shahzhad S, Salahhudin M. Original article sociodemographic and reproductive factors affecting knowledge of married men accepting vasectomy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016 Apr/June;28(2):323–6. PMID: 28718551

Subramanian L, Cisek C, Kanlisi N, Pile JM. The Ghana vasectomy initiative : facilitating client – provider communication on no-scalpel vasectomy. Patient Educ Couns, 2010 Dec;81(3):374–80. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.008

Borrero S, Moore CG, Creinin MD, Said A. Low rates of vasectomy among minorities : a result of. Am J Mens Health. 2010 Sept;4(3):243–9. Doi: 10.1177/1557988309337619

Sossou MAAR. Attitudes toward and use of knowledge about family planning among Ghanaian men. Int J Men’s Heal. 2008;7(2):109–20. Doi: 10.3149/jmh.0702.109

Kanakis GA, Goulis DD. Male contraception: a clinically-oriented review. Hormones. 2015 Oct/Dec;14(4):598–614. Doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.1623

Page ST, Amory JK, Bremner WJ. Advances in male contraception. Endocr Rev. 2008 June;29(4):465–93. Doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0041

Garg PK, Jain BK, Choudhary D, Chaurasia A, Pandey SD. Nonscalpel vasectomy as family planning method : a battle yet to be conquered. ISRN Urol. 2013; 2013(1):2–5. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/752174

Fataneh G, Marjan MH, Nasrin R, Taraneh T. Sexual function in Iranian women using different methods of contraception. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Nov;22(21-22):3016–23. Doi: 10.1111/jocn.12289

Wang C, Swerdloff RS. Hormonal approaches to male contraception. Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Nov;20(6):520–4. Doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833f1b4a

Valsangkar S, Sai SK, Bele SD, Bodhare TN. Predictors of no-scalpel vasectomy acceptance in Karimnagar district , Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Urol. 2012 July/Sept;28(3):292–6. Doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.102704

Murdoch FE, Goldberg E. Male contraception : another holy grail. BMCL. 2013 Jan;24(2):419–24. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.12.004

Lu WH, Liang XW, Gu YQ, Wu WX, Bo LW, Zheng TG, et al. Operational andrology a randomized , controlled , multicenter contraceptive efficacy clinical trial of the intravas device , a nonocclusive surgical male sterilization. Asian J Androl. 2014 May/June;16(3):432–6. Doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.122860

Trollip GS, Fisher M, Naidoo A, Theron PD, Heyns CF. Vasectomy under local anaesthesia performed free of charge as a family planning service : complications and results. S Afr Med J. 2009 Apr;99(4):238–42. PMID: 19588776

Cook LA, Vliet HAV, Lopez LM, Pun A, Gallo MF. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization ( Review ). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar; 30(3):CD003991. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub4

Mahmood H, Khan Z, Masood S. Effects of male literacy on family size : a cross sectional study conducted in Chakwal city. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Apr;66(4):399–403. PMID: 27122264

Chang YH, Hsiao PJ, Chen GH, Chang CH, Chen WC, Yeh CC, et al. Economic fluctuation affects vasectomy utilization : a single-institution study. Urol Sci. 2015;26(July 1964):214–7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urols.2015.06.155

Potter JE, White K, Hopkins K, Mckinnon S, Shedlin MG, Amastae J, et al. Frustrated demand for sterilization among low-income Latinas in El Paso, Texas. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;44(4):228–35. Doi: 10.1363/4422812

Simbar M. Achievements of the Iranian family planning programmes 1956-2006. East Mediterr Health J. 2012 Mar;18(3):279–86. PMID: 22574484

Winarni E, Dawam M. Evaluation of Momentum Male Sterilization Service Effectiveness as an Attempt to Reach Museum Rekor Indonesia. Kesmas Nat Public Health J. 2017;11(3):145–52. Doi: 10.21109/kesmas.v11i3.800

Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i11a237248p3098-3109-2018



 

INDEXADORES E BASES BIBLIOGRÁFICAS:

doaj

capes bvs ebesco elsevier nlm diadorim periodicaabec

 

cinahl citefactor cuidenplusb socolar ulrichs sumarios

 

Licença Creative Commons

All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License