Competência metafórica e a Linguística Cultural: Exemplo de conceptualização das emoções em Chinês e na cultura ocidental
Abstract
Resumo: O presente texto foca a noção de competência metafórica (Aleshtar and Dowlatabadi, 2014: 1895; cf. Shirazi and Talebinezhad, 2013: 135). No processo de aquisição/ aprendizagem da linguagem, o falante deve desenvolver competência metafórica, a fim de poder comunicar numa língua nova de modo fluente e apropriado conceptualmente. O estudo centra-se na conceptualização das emoções (a tristeza profunda, a raiva ou o sentimento de lealdade), contrastando a língua e a cultura chinesas e a cultura ocidental, utilizando a análise da corporização (embodiement) não só fisiológica como também cultural (cf. Sinha e López, 2004; Sharifian, 2015, Yu, 2007; Pires, 2015).
References
Referências
ABRANTES, A. M. (1999). O regresso às emoções: a expressão da raiva em português. In Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades, 3. Braga, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Filosofia, 101-138.
ALESHTAR, M. T. and H. DOWLATABADI (2014). Metaforic Competence and Language Proficiency in the Same Boat. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014) 1895-1904.
BATORÉO, H. J. (2004). Linguística Portuguesa: Abordagem Cognitiva [CD-Rom]. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.
BATORÉO, H. J. (2015). Linguística Cultural e o Estudo do Léxico da Língua Portuguesa (PE
e PB). In: Simões, Darcília, Paulo Osório e Cecília Molica (org.). Contribuição à Linguística
no Brasil: um projecto de vida. Miscelânea em Homenagem a Cláudia Roncarati, Rio de
Janeiro: Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Dialogarts, 98-143. ISBN digital:
-85-8199-031-6. ISBN Impresso: 978-85-8199-032-3.
http://www.dialogarts.uerj.br/arquivos/miscelanea_em_homenagem_a_claudia_roncarati.pdf
DANESI, M. (1993). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second lan- guage teaching: The neglected dimension. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Language, Communication and Social Meaning (pp. 489–500). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
DOIZ, A. and C. ELIZARI (2013). Metaphoric competence and the acquisition of figurative vocabular in foreign language. ELIA – Estudios de Linguística Inglesa Aplicada, 13, 2013, 47-82.
JANDA, L. A. (2008). From Cognitive Linguistics to Cultural Linguistics. Slovo a smysl/ Word and Sense, 33 pages, ms. ISSN 1214-7915.
LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
OTS, T. (1990). The angry liver, the anxious heart and the melancholy spleen. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 14 (1). 21–58.
PIRES, L. (2015). O Fígado em Expressões Idiomáticas Chinesas: Uma Perspectiva Cognitiva e Cultural. Seminário de Linguagem, Cognição e Cultura, Doutoramento em Estudos Portugueses, Universidade Aberta, Lisboa, ms.
SHARIFIAN, F. (2010). Cultural conceptualizations in intercultural communication: a study of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3367–3376.
SHARIFIAN, F. (2011a). Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
SHARIFIAN, F. (2011b). Cultural Linguistics. Inaugural Professoral Lecture, Professor Farzad Sharafian, School of Language, Cultures, and Linguistics, Language and Society Centre, Monash University.
SHARIFIAN, F. (2011c). Language and Society. Video.
http://arts.monash.edu.au/language-and-society/farzad-lecture -june-11.php
SHARIFIAN, F. and G. B. Palmer, (eds.). (2007). Applied cultural linguistics: Implications for second language learning and intercultural communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: JohnBenjamins.
SHARIFIAN, F.; R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Neiemier, S. (eds.). (2008). Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 45-74.
SHARIFAN, F. (2015). Cultural Linguistics. In F. Sharifan (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. 473-493. Oxford: Routledge
SHIRAZI, M. G. and M. R. TALEBINEZHAD (2013). Developing Intermediate EFL Learners Metaphorical Competence through Exposure. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Jan. 2014, Vol. 3, Nº 1, 135-141.
SIAHAAN, P. (2008). Did he break your heart or your liver? A contrastive study on metaphorical concepts from the source domain ORGAN in English and in Indonesian. In F.
SINHA, Ch. And K. J de López (2004). Language, Culture and the Embodiement of Spatial Cognition, Cognitive Linguistics, 11: 17-41.
YU, N. (1995). Metaphorical Expressions of Anger and Happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10 (2). 59–92.
YU, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: a perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Yu, N. (2003). Metaphor, Body, and Culture: The Chinese Understanding of Gallbladder and Courage. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (1), 13–31.
YU, N. (2007). The Chinese conceptualization of the heart and its cultural context Implications for second language learning. In F. Sharifian & G. B. Palmer (Eds.), Applied cultural linguistics: Implications for second language learning and intercultural communication. 65-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
YU, N. (2008a) Metaphor from Body and Culture. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. 247-261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
YU, N. (2008b). The Chinese heart as the central faculty of cognition. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages.131-168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Hanna Batoréo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Revista Investigações agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The contents of this journal are licensed under 