Inteligencia artificial y ética en el sector público
el lugar de las personas en el proceso de toma de decisiones
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/1679-1827.2024.262501Palabras clave:
Administracion pubica, Gestión de personas, Ética, Toma de decisiones, Inteligencia artificialResumen
El artículo aborda el entrelazamiento entre la inteligencia artificial (IA) y la ética. Examina la literatura sobre la comprensión de la ética en el campo de la IA, identificando los límites de las prácticas convencionales para establecer pautas y códigos de conducta aplicables al diseño de tecnologías de IA con énfasis en responsabilizar a los desarrolladores profesionales. Presenta dos interpretaciones de la ética: como un conjunto de principios y valores, y como un juicio crítico-reflexivo situado en parámetros morales compartidos. Explica las perspectivas de implementar una ética basada en la coerción según un enfoque disciplinario en contraste con el que privilegia la educación. Destaca la apropiación imprecisa del concepto de ética reducida a una conducta moral prescrita y la posibilidad de cambiar el enfoque de la ética para llegar también al usuario de los resultados generados por las herramientas de IA en el contexto de procesos de toma de decisiones que pretenden ser éticamente justificada en el ámbito de la administración pública. Se enfatiza la importancia de la capacidad crítico-reflexiva de extensión radical que se requiere de los agentes públicos, especialmente considerando las repercusiones sociales y políticas de las acciones y deliberaciones producidas a partir de los resultados generados por las tecnologías de IA.
Citas
Abbagnano, N. (2012). Dicionário de Filosofia. São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes.
Aristóteles. Ética a Nicômaco. 4ª Edição, São Paulo: EDIPRO, 2014.
Bankins, Sarah & Formosa, Paul. The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 725–740, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7
Bankins, S. (2021). The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision‑making framework. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09619-6
Bergue, S. T. (2022a). Ética como competência: interseções entre a administração e a filosofia. Revista Gestão & Planejamento, 23, 73-87. DOI: 10.53706/gep.v.23.7297
Bergue, S. T. (2022b). Ética, códigos de conduta e integridade na administração pública brasileira. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 14 (4), https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v14i4.13459
Bergue, S. T. (2022c). Contribuições da problematização filosófica para o estudo da administração pública. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 28(1), DOI: 10.1590/1413-2311.344.118517
Bergue, Sandro Trescastro. Pensamento filosófico na administração pública. Caxias do Sul: EDUCS, 2022d. Acessível em: https://www.ucs.br/educs/livro/pensamento-filosofico-na-administracao-publica/
Boer, N. & Raaphorst, N. (2023). Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 25(1), 42-62, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
Buchanan, B. G. (2005). A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, 26(4), 53 DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v26i4.1848. Disponível em: https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/1848.
Charalabidis, Y; Medaglia, R. & Noordt, C. (2024). Introduction to the Research handbook on public management and artificial intelligence. (p. 1-6) In Y. Charalabidis; R. Medaglia & C. Noordt. Research handbook on public management and artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781802207347
Cortina, A.; Martínez, E. (2005). Ética. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Downe, J.; Cowell, R.; & Morgan, K. (2016). What determines ethical behavior in public organizations: Is it rules or leadership? Public Administration Review, 76(6), 898–909. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12562.
Ferraz, C. A. (2014). Elementos de ética. Pelotas: NEPFIL OnLine, acesso: http://nepfil.ufpel.edu.br
Franzke, A. S.; Muis, I. & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5
Gal, U; Hansen, S. & Lee, A. S. (2022). Research Perspectives: Toward Theoretical Rigor in Ethical Analysis: The Case of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 1634-1661. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00784
Garcia-Murillo, M. & MacInnes, I. (2024). Introduction to the handbook of artificial intelligence at work: interconnections and policy implications. (p. 1-14). In M. Garcia-Murillo; I. MacInnes & A. Renda. Handbook of artificial intelligence at work: interconnections and policy implications. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781800889972
Garcia, Ana Cristina B. (2020). Ética e inteligência artificial. Computação Brasil, 14-22. DOI: 10.5753/CompBR.2020.43.1791
Giarmoleo, F. V., Ferrero, I., Rocchi, M., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2024). What ethics can say on artificial intelligence: Insights from a systematic literature review. Business and Society Review, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12336
Guerreiro Ramos, A. (1984). Modelos de homem e teoria administrativa. Revista de Administração Pública, 18(2), 3-12.
Hagendorff, T. (2022a). Blind spots in AI ethics. AI and Ethics, 2, 851–867. doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00122-8.
Hagendorff, T. (2022b). A Virtue-Based Framework to Support Putting AI Ethics into Practice. Philosophy & Technology. 35(55), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00553-z
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30, 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Hallamaa, J. & Kalliokoski, T. (2022). AI Ethics as applied ethics. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4. DOI:10.3389/fcomp.2022.776837
Hanna, R.; Kazim, E. (2021). Philosophical foundations for digital ethics and AI Ethics: a dignitarian approach. AI and Ethics, 1, 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00040-9
Japiassú, H. (2006). O sonho transdisciplinar e as razões da filosofia. Rio de Janeiro: Imago.
Japiassú, H; Marcondes, D. (2006). Dicionário básico de filosofia. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Kant, I. (2012). Immanuel Kant: Textos seletos. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Kant, I. (2019). Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Kaufman, D. (2016). Inteligência artificial: questões éticas a serem enfrentadas. IX Simpósio Nacional ABCiber: cibercultura, democracia e liberdade no Brasil. PUC/SP 8 a 10 de dezembro.
Maas, J. (2022). A neo-republican critique of AI ethics. Journal of Responsible Technology, v. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100022
Meyer-Sahling, J.-H.; Mikkelsen, K. S. (2022). Codes of Ethics, Disciplinary Codes, and the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Frameworks: Evidence from a Survey of Civil Servants in Poland. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20949420
Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
Munn, L. (2023). The uselessness of AI ethics. AI Ethics, 3, 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w
OCDE. (2024). OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, OECD/LEGAL/0449. OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449#mainText
Oldenhof, L., Postma, J., & Putters, K. (2014). On justification work: How compromising enables public managers to deal with conflicting values. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 52-63. doi:10.1111/puar.12153
European Parliament. (2023). DRAFT Compromise Amendments on the Draft Report. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/CJ40/DV/2023/05-11/ConsolidatedCA_IMCOLIBE_AI_ACT_EN.pdf
Piteira, M., Aparicio, M. & Costa, C. J. (2019). A ética na inteligência artificial: Desafios. In Rocha, A., Pedrosa, I., Cota, M. P. and Goncalves, R. (Ed.), 2019. 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Coimbra: IEEE.
Rochel, J., Evéquoz, F. (2021). Getting into the engine room: a blueprint to investigate the shadowy steps of AI ethics. AI & Society, 36, 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01069-w
Santos, L. S., Leal, F. G., Serafim, M. C., & Moraes, M. C. B. (2018). Values and public administration: A discussion on rationality and parenthetical attitude. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 19(3). doi:10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMG170136
Siau, K. & Wang, W. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and Ethical AI. Journal of Database Management, 31(2), April-June. DOI: 10.4018/JDM.2020040105
Sousa, W. G..; Melo, E. R.; Bermejo, P. H.; Farias, R. A.; & Gomes, A. O. (2019). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004
Steden, R. (2020). Blind spots in public ethics and integrity research: what public administration scholars can learn from Aristotle. Public Integrity, 33(3), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1714412
Straub, V. J.; Morgan, D.; Brigth, J. & Margetts, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in government: concepts, standards, and a unified framework. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101881
Thomann, E; Engen, N., & Tummers, L. (2018). The Necessity of Discretion: A Behavioral Evaluation of Bottom-Up Implementation Theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy024
Valle-Cruz, D.; Gil-Garcia, J. R. & Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence algorithms and applications in the public sector: a systematic literature review based on the PRISMA approach. (p. 8-26) In Y. Charalabidis; R. Medaglia & C. Noordt. Research handbook on public management and artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781802207347
Waelen, R. (2022). Why AI Ethics is a critical theory. Philosophy & Technology, 35(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00507-5
Wang, P. (2019). On Defining Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1-37. DOI:10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
Wernaart, B.F.W. (2022). An introduction to moral design and technology. (p. 13-23) In Wernaart, Bart F.W (ed). Moral design and technology. Wageningen Academic Publishers. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-922-0_1
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Os trabalhos assinados são de responsabilidade exclusiva do(s) autor(es).
Os direitos, inclusive os de tradução, são reservados.
É permitido citar os trabalhos publicados sem autorização prévia desde que seja identificada a fonte.
