An ethics against fatalism

reflections on freedom, virtue and common utility in Spinoza

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2024.265133

Keywords:

providence, fatalism, liberty, ethics

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze some aspects of Spinoza's conception of freedom and its link with the notion of virtue, in order to show that Spinoza is not a fatalist and that, on the contrary, from his philosophical project follows a conception of human freedom that implies not only the effective possibility of acting on the real, together with other individuals, but also the possibility of seeing one's own power increase in this work of collective resistance. In order to carry out our purpose, the article will be divided into two main parts: in the first, referring to different passages of his work, we return to Spinoza's critique of the traditional notion of providence. In the second part of this article, concentrating on Spinoza's Ethics, we will study some elements that lead us to affirm the possibility of thinking an ethics of liberation within the framework of the universal determinism that his ontology of immanence postulates.

References

BODEI, Remo. Geometría de las pasiones. Miedo, esperanza, felicidad: filosofía y uso político. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1995.

CHAUI, Marilena. A Nervura do real. Imanência e liberdade em Espinosa. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1999.

DESCARTES, René. Principios de la filosofía. Madrid: Alianza, 2002.

DESCARTES, René. Obras, vol. II. Madrid: Gredos, 2011.

DESCARTES, René. Meditaciones metafísicas. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros, Buenos Aires, 2009.

DESCARTES, René. Las pasiones del alma. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1997.

GIANCOTTI, Emilia. “Necessità e libertà. Riflessioni sui testi spinoziani”. In: BOSTRENGHI, Daniela; SANTINELLI, Cristina (Eds.). Studi su Hobbes e Spinoza, Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1995, pp. 57-80.

LLOYD, Genevieve. Providence Lost. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2008.

MACHEREY, Pierre. Introduction à l’Ethique de Spinoza, la prémière partie: la nature del choses. Paris: PUF, 2011.

MATHERON, Alexandre. “Essence, existence et puissance dans le livre I de L’Éthique: les fondements de la proposition 16”. In:

MATHERON, Alexandre. Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge classique, Lyon: ENS Éditions 2011. pp. 567-577.

ROUSSET, Bernard. La perspective finale de l'Ethique et le problème de la cohérence du spinozisme. L'autonomie comme salut. Paris: Vrin, 1968.

ROVERE, Maxime. Spinoza. Méthodes pour exister. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2010.

SEVERAC, Pascal. Le devenir actif chez Spinoza. Paris: Honoré Champion Éditeur, 2005.

SPINOZA, Baruch. Pensamientos metafísicos. Madrid: Editorial Alianza, 2006.

SPINOZA, Baruch. Tratado de la reforma del entendimiento. Madrid Editorial Alianza, 2006.

SPINOZA, Baruch. Tratado Breve. Madrid: Editorial Alianza, 1990.

SPINOZA, Baruch. Tratado teológico político. Barcelona: Ediciones Altaya, 1994.

SPINOZA, Baruch. Ética demostrada según el orden geométrico. Madrid: Trotta, 2009.

TOSEL, André. “Qu'est-ce qu'agir pour un mode fini selon Spinoza?”, Philosophie, No. 53, p. 96-110, 1997.

Published

2024-12-10

Issue

Section

Número especial: Livre-arbítrio e responsabilidade moral