Primary reason, intention and non-human animals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2021.250138

Keywords:

Intentional action, primary reason, planning theory of intention

Abstract

In this paper my claim is twofold. First, I will make a critical analysis of Davidson’s theory of action, according to it a mere bodily movement becomes an intentional action when it is justified, rationalized and caused by primary reason, which is constituted by a conative attitude – desire – and a cognitive one – belief. Davidson, however, does not take an intention as a distinctive mental attitude and ends up reducing it to the primary reason. I will take Bratman’s planning theory of intention in order to make a critical analysis of Davidson’s theory. Bratman’s theory will be treated as an extension of Davidson’s theory. Bratman claims that non-human animals are not planner agents, thus they cannot engage in intentional planned actions. Secondly, I will make a critique over Bratman’s stipulative demarcation in order to extend intentional planned actions towards non-human animals.

References

ANSCOMBE, Elizabeth, 2000,Intention(reprint), Cambridge, MA: Har-vard University Press.

BRATMAN, Michael, 1983, “Taking Plans Seriously”, Social Theory and Practice, Vol. 9, Nos. 2-3: 271-287

BRATMAN, Michael, 1984, “Two Faces of Intention”,Philosophical Review, 93: 375–405;reprinted in Mele 19

BRATMAN, Michael, 1987,Intention,Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.

BRATMAN, Michael, 1999,Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BRATMAN, Michael, 2006,Structures of Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DAVIDSON, Donald, 2001,Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

DAVIDSON, Donald, 2004,Problems of Rationality, with introduction by Marcia Cavelland interview with Ernest Lepore, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

DRETSKE, F.,1988,Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes,Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.

EVNINE, Simon, 1991,Donald Davidson, Cambridge: Polity Press.

GODFREY-SMITH, Peter. Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and theDeep Origins of Consciousness, William Collins, 2016.

GOLDMAN, Alvin, 1970,A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.

HURLEY, S.L (2003a), “Animal Action in the Space of Reasons”, Mindand Language, 18:231-256

HURLEY, S.L,(2006). Making sense of animals. In S. Hurley & M. Nudds(Eds.),Rational animals?(pp. 139-171). New York, NY, US: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

LEPORE, Ernest and Brian McLaughlin (eds.), 1985,Actions andEvents: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford:Basil Blackwell.

MULCAHY, N, J. & CALL, J. (2006). Apes Save Tools for Future Use. Sci-ence (New York, N.Y.). 312. 1038-40. 10.1126/science.1125456.

PERINI-SANTOS, Ernesto: A Second Naturalization for a Second Nature.In: Sanguinetti, F ; Abath, A.. (Org.). Studies in German Idealism. 1ed.:Springer International Publishing, 2018, v. , p. 177-192.

PERINI-SANTOS, Ernesto, Conteúdo não conceitual, holismo e normatividade. Kriterion(UFMG. Impresso), Belo Horizonte, v. 110, p. 238-263, 2004.

Published

2021-04-11

Issue

Section

Dossiê temático dedicado à Filosofia Analítica Sul-Americana