Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Problem of Consciousness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2025.256815

Keywords:

metalinguistic negotiation, metaphilosophy, conceptual ethics, conceptual engineering, problem of consciousness

Abstract

The proposal of metalinguistic negotiations aims to explain the functioning of several linguistic exchanges, revealing not only metalinguistic disputes disguised as literal disputes, but also revealing less obvious normative disputes. Plunkett (2015) applies this panorama to try to offer clarity to the methodology of philosophical disputes. In the first part of this work, I provide a brief introduction to the proposal for metalinguistic negotiations. In the second part, I apply the presented framework to consider some philosophical disputes regarding consciousness. More specifically, I analyze the debate about the reality of consciousness as a metalinguistic dispute regarding the notion of ‘real’. I conclude that thinking of such a debate as a metalinguistic negotiation offers interesting interpretative gains.

Author Biography

João César Ramos, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)

Bacharel e Mestre em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, na linha de Metafísica e Mente. Doutorando em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, na linha de Lógica, Ciência, Mente e Linguagem.

References

BARKER, Chris. The Dynamics of Vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 2002, pp. 1-36.

BURGESS, Alexis; PLUNKETT, David. Conceptual Ethics I. Philosophy Compass, v. 8, n. 12, 2013, pp. 1091-101.

CAPPELEN, Herman. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

CHALMERS, David J. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Theory of Conscious Experience. Santa Cruz: Department of Philosophy, University of California, 1995.

CHALMERS, David J. Verbal Disputes. Philosophical Review, v. 120, n. 4, 2011, pp. 315-60.

CHURCHLAND, Patricia S. Neurophilosophy. MIT Press, 1987.

CHURCHLAND, Paul M. A Neurocomputational Perspective. MIT Press, 1989.

DENNETT, Daniel C. Consciousness Explained. New York: Back Bay Books, 1991.

DESCARTES, René. Discurso do Método. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001.

DESCARTES, René. Meditações Metafísicas. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

FRANKISH, Keith. “Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness”. In: Ed. FRANKISH, Keith. Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness. Imprint Academic, 2017, pp. 13-48.

GOFF, Philip. Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. Nova York: Pantheon Books, 2019.

JACKSON, Frank. Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 127, pp. 127-136; April, 1982.

KAPLAN, David. Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives. In: Ed. AL,MOG, Joseph & PERRY, John. Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 481-563.

LUDLOW, Peter. Cheap Contextualism. Philosophical Issues, 18, 2008, pp. 104-29.

MARQUES, Teresa. What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do. Phenomenology and Mind, 12, 2017, pp. 40-8.

NAGEL, Thomas. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, V. 83, N. 4, 1974, pp. 435-450.

PLUNKETT, David. Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy. Inquiry, V. 58, N. 7-8, 2015, pp. 828-874.

PLUNKETT, David; SUNDELL, Timothy. Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms. Philosophers Imprint, V. 13, N. 23, 2013, pp. 1-37.

PLUNKETT, David; SUNDELL, Timothy. Metalinguistic Negotiation and Speaker Error. Inquiry, V. 64, N. 1-2, 2021, pp. 142-67.

SELLARS, Wilfrid. Philosophy and The Scientific Image of Man. Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, ed. Robert Colodny. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962, pp. 35-78.

STRAWSON, Galen. Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism. Em: Ed. STRAWSON, Galen. Real Materialism and Other Essays. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 53-74.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

Issue

Vol. 52 No. 1 (2025): Ética Conceitual e Engenharia Conceitual

Section

Numero especial: Ética Conceitual e Engenharia Conceitual

License

Copyright (c) 2025 João César Ramos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://memoria2.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizes/

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

  2. Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

Licença Creative Commons
As obras publicadas pela Revista Perspectiva Filosófica estão licenciadas com Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.