Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Knowledge of Separated Substances in the Summa contra Gentiles III
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2357-9986.2025.263439Keywords:
intellect, substance, soul, knowledgeAbstract
Thomas’ view regarding the knowledge of separated substances seems to shift over the course of his intellectual work. What initially appears as a consideration of the possibility of such knowledge eventually becomes, in his mature writings, a kind of restriction or blockage with respect to it. The central background of this debate seems to be Thomas’ engagement with Averroes’ position, expressed in the Great Commentary on the De Anima, and Averroes’ supposed ease in positing a passage from the mode of knowledge directed toward the sensible to another mode oriented toward separated substances, a transition the Cordoban thinker understands as a continuous process. This is precisely what Thomas rejects in the Summa contra Gentiles. A clear connection emerges here with the ancient philosophical notion of ultimate happiness, which resides in the knowledge of substances that are ontologically separated from matter, whereas Thomas’ view locates ultimate happiness directly in the possibility of the direct vision of God. In addressing this important theme, Thomas seems intent on surpassing Averroes’ position while indicating an approximation between the beatific vision and the knowledge of separated substances.
References
AVERROIS, Cordvbensis. Commentarivm Magnvm in Aristotelis De anima libros. Ed. F. Stuart Crawford. Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1953.
AVERROIS, Cordvbensis. L'intelligence et la Pensée: Grand Commentaire du De Anima livre III. Trad., introd. e notas por Alain de Libera. Paris: Flammarion, 1998.
AVERROIS, Cordvbensis. Long Commentary on the De Anima of Artistotle. Translated and with introduction and notes by Richard C. Taylor with Thrérèse-Anne Druart, subeditor. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2009.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. A unidade do intelecto contra os Averroístas. Tradução, introdução e notas: Carlos Arthur Ribeiro do Nascimento. São Paulo: Paulus, 2016.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. Suma teológica. Trad. C. J. P. Oliveira et alii. 4. ed. São Paulo: Loyola, 2015. Vol. 2.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. Suma Contra os Gentios. Volume III. Trad. Maurílio José de Oliveira Camello. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2015.
ARISTÓTELES. Sobre a alma. São Paulo: WMF Martins fontes, 2013.
BAZAN, B. Intellectum Speculativum: Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, and Siger of Brabant on the intelligible object. Journal of the History of Philosophy - Volume 19, Number 4, October 1981.
BLACK, D. Conjuntion and the Identity of Knower And Known in Averroes. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 1999.
BLACK, D. Psychology: Soul and Intellect. In: ADAMSON, P. and TAYLOR, R. (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
BRENET, J. B. A minha ideia: Aquisição e Atribuição no Pensamento de Averróis. Revista Discurso n. 40. São Paulo: USP/FFLCH, 2010. pp. 329-350
BRENET, J. B. S’unir à l’intellect, voir Dieu, Averroès et la doctrine de la jonction au coeur du thomisme. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, vol. 21. Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp.215-247.
BRENET, J. B. Habitus de science et subjectité. Thomas d’Aquin, Averroès – I. In: ERISMANN, C. & SCHNIEWIND, A. (eds.). In: Compléments de substance. Études sur les propriétés accidentelles offertes à Alain de Libera. Paris: Vrin, 2008.
DAVIDSON, H. A. Alfarabi, Avicena, and Averróis, on intellect / Their Cosmologies, theories of the active intellect, and theories of human intellect. Oxford University Press, 1992.
TAYLOR, R. Intelligibles in act in Averroes. In: Averroes et les averroïsmes juif et latin : Actes du colloque international, Paris, 16-18 juin 2005.Textes et Études du Moyen Âge : v. 40. Turnhout : Brepols, 2007.
TAYLOR, R. The Agent Intellect as ‘form for us’ and Averroes’s Critique of al-Fârâbî. Tópicos, 2005, (29), 29-5. México city:Universidad Panamericana.
TAYLOR, R. Averroes’ Epistemology and its Critique by Aquinas. In: Thomistic Papers VII. Medieval Masters: Essays in Memory of Msgr. Houston: E.A. Synan, R.E. Houser, ed. 1999, 147-177.
TAYLOR, R. Separate Material Intellect in Averroes’ Mature Philosophy. In: Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea. Studies on the sources, contents and influences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science, dedicated to Gerhard Endress on his sixty-fifth birthday. Leuven: Peeters, Ruediger Arnzen and Joern Thielmann (eds.), 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arthur Klik de Lima

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A Revista Perspectiva Filosófica orienta seus procedimentos de gestão de artigos conforme as diretrizes básicas formuladas pelo Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). http://memoria2.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizes/
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
-
Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
-
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (Consultar http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).

As obras publicadas pela Revista Perspectiva Filosófica estão licenciadas com Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.








