Efeito de doses de fósforo na mobilidade do arsênio e no desenvolvimento de duas essências florestais (Phosphorus doses effect on the arsenic mobility and the development of two forest essences)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v11.2.p401-414Keywords:
fitorremediação, arsenato, toxicidade, ingá, angico-vermelhoAbstract
O arsênio é o elemento químico nocivo à saúde humana. A recuperação de áreas com presença de As requer utilização de espécies tolerantes e manejo adequado da adubação, especialmente do fósforo (P). Assim, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a interação de doses As e P no desenvolvimento de mudas florestais ingá e angico-vermelho. O delineamento foi em blocos casualizados, em esquema fatorial 5 x 3, sendo 5 doses de As (0, 100, 200, 400 e 800 mg dm-3) e 3 doses de P (0, 150 e 450 mg dm-3) com três repetições. As variáveis analisadas foram matéria seca, altura e diâmetro das plantas e análise do néctar produzido pelas plantas. Aos 10 dias de cultivo as plantas de ingá apresentaram intoxicação com clorose internerval, seguida de necrose, nas doses de 400 e 800 mg dm-3 de As e na ausência de P. Por outro lado, as doses crescentes de arsênio, mesmo na presença do P, contribuíram para reduzir a produção de matéria seca de raízes e parte aérea, altura e diâmetro de planta. As plantas de angico apresentaram-se mais tolerantes que as de ingá. Na avaliação do néctar coletado constatou-se que tais espécies podem absorver, transportar e eliminar arsênio por meio dos nectários foliares. Maiores teores de As no néctar foram encontrados em angico-vermelho (40,50 mg kg-1), enquanto o ingá apresentou teor médio de 3,24 mg kg-1, para a combinação 100 mg dm-3 de As e ausência de P, ambos valores acima do permitido em mel para consumo humano.
A B S T R A C T
Arsenic (As) is the chemical element most harmful to human health. Rehabilitation of areas with As presence requires the use of tolerant species and adequate fertilization management, especially phosphorus (P). Therefore, this work aims to evaluate the As and P interaction in the seedlings development of species inga (Inga edulis Mart.) and angico-vermelho [Anadenanthera peregrina (L.) Speg.]. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, with three replications, in a 5 x 3 factorial scheme. We used 5 doses of As (0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mg dm-3) and 3 doses of P (0, 150 and 450 mg dm-3). The analyzed variables were dry matter, height and diameter of the plants and nectar produced by plants. At 10 cultivation days, the ingá plants presented the basal leaves margins purplish with internerval chlorosis, followed by necrosis, only at 400 and 800 mg dm-3 of As and in the P absence. This shows P reduces As toxicity to plants, even at high doses. On the other hand, increasing arsenic doses, even in the P presence, contributed to significantly decrease of roots and shoot dry matter production, height and plant diameter. Increasing P doses for each As dose resulted in increased growth variables, especially in angico plants. The As toxic effect varies according to species, taking into account the symptoms of leaf toxicity and the growth variables analyzed. The angico plants were more tolerant than inga. Booth forest species can absorb, transport and eliminate part of the arsenic through the foliar nectaries, probably, as an elimination mechanism of this metalloid. Higher As-levels in nectar were found in angico (40.50 mg kg-1), while the ingá presented mean content of 3.24 mg kg-1, for the combination of 100 mg dm-3 of As and P absence, both values above that allowed in honey for human consumption.
Keywords: phytoremediation, arsenate, toxicity, inga, angico
Downloads
References
Accioly, A.M.A., Siqueira, J.O., 2000. Contaminação química e biorremediação do solo. Tópicos em Ciência do Solo 1, 299-351.
Adriano, D.C., 2001. Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment: Biogeochemistry, Bioavailability, and Risks of Metals, 2 ed. Springer, New York.
Alvarez V., H.V., 1974. Equilíbrio de formas disponíveis de fósforo e enxofre em dois Latossolos de Minas Gerais. Dissertação (Mestrado). Viçosa, UFV.
Antelo, J., Arce, F., Fiol, S., 2015. Arsenate and phosphate adsorption on ferrihydrite nanoparticles. Synergetic interaction with calcium ions. Chemical Geology 410, 53-62.
Berton, R.S., 2000. Riscos de contaminação do agroecossistema com metais pesados, in: Bettiol, W., Camargo, O.A. (Eds). Impacto ambiental do uso agrícola do lodo de esgoto. Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, p.259-268.
BRASIL, 2000. Instrução normativa nº 11, de 20 de outubro.
Campos, M.L., Guilherme, L.R.G., Antunes, A.S., Borges, K.S.C., 2013. Teor de arsênio e adsorção competitiva arsênio/fosfato e arsênio/sulfato em solos de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Ciência Rural 46, 985-991.
Chen, M., Ma, L.Q., Hoogeweg, C.G., Harris, W.G., 2001. Arsenic background concentrations in Florida, U.S.A. surface soils: Determination and interpretation. Environmental Forensics 2, 117-126.
COPAM, 2011. Deliberação normativa Nº 166, de 29 de junho.
Favas, P.J.C., Pratas, J., 2015. Heavy metals and arsenic uptake by wild vegetation in old mining areas of Portugal: Phytoremediation perspectives. Journal of Biotechnology 208, S58.
Felipe, R.T.A., Oliveira, J.A., Leão, G.A., 2009. Potencial de Cajanus cajan e Crotalaria spectabilis para fitorremediação: absorção de arsênio e respostas antioxidativas. Revista Árvore 33, 245-254.
Jacobs, L.W., Keeney, D.R., 1970. Arsenic-phosphorous interactions on corn. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1, 85-93.
Matschullat, J. Arsenic in the geosphere-A review. Science of the Total Environment 249, 297-312.
Meharg, A.A, Hartley-Whitaker, J., 2002. Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phytologist 154, 29-43.
Smith, E., Naidu, R., Alston, A.M., 1998. Arsenic in the soil environment: a review. Advances in Agronomy 64, 149-195.
Sneller, F.E.C., Van Heerwaarden, L.M., Kraaijeveld-Smit, F.J.L., Ten Bookum, W.M., Koevoets, P.L.M., Schat, H., Verkleij, J.A.C., 1999. Toxicity of arsenate in Silene vulgaris, accumulation and degradation of arsenate-induced phytochelatins. New Phytologist 144, 223-232.
Tedesco, M.J., Gianello, C., Bissani, C.A., Bohnen, H., Volkweiss, S.J., 1995. Análise de solo, plantas e outros materiais, 2 ed. UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
Tu, C., Ma, L.Q., 2003. Effects of arsenate and phosphate on their accumulation by an arsenic-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. Plant and Soil 249, 373-382.
Wang, J., Zhao, F.J., Meharg, A.A., Raab, A., Feldmann, J., Macgrath, S.P., 2002. Mechanisms of arsenic hyperaccumulation in Pteris vittata. Uptake kinetics, interactions with phosphate and arsenic speciation. Plant Physiology 130, 1552-1561.
Wauchope, R.D., 1983. Uptake, translocation and phytotoxicity of arsenic in plants, in: Lederer, W.H., Fensterheim, R.J. (Eds.), Arsenic: Industrial, Biomedical, Environmental Perspectives. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 348-375.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Roseli Freire Melo, Luiz Eduardo Dias, Igor Rodrigues Assis, Norivaldo Anjos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to make their work available online before or during the editorial process, on academic social networks, digital repositories, or preprint servers. After publication in Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, authors are expected to update the preprint or postprint versions on the platforms where they were originally made available, providing a link to the final published version and any other relevant information, with proper recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.