Citizenship sited | is there a dilemma between social isolation and negacionist mobilization?

Authors

  • André Ricardo do Passo Magnelli Ateliê de Humanidades
  • Paulo Henrique Martins Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2179-7501.2020.247829

Keywords:

pandemic, citizenship, scholarship, social isolation, motivations

Abstract

The Brazilian population has been caught in the crossfire of drastic binary alternatives between social isolation and denialist mobilisation, generating growing anxiety as no solution to the pandemic is seen in the medium term. On the one hand, we see the "stay at home" campaign and social confinement, which seeks to prevent the accelerated spread of the coronavirus, inviting individuals  to  assume  individual  and  collective  responsibility  for  public  health  and  following scientific  and  health  recommendations.  On  the  other  hand,  we  see  the  "Brazil  cannot  stop" campaign, which preaches the resumption of "normality" in life and work, minimizing the risks of the pandemic and following the denialist guidelines of bolsonarism. It is necessary to identify the different social groups that advocate the resumption of socio-economic activities -or that simply disobey the policy of social isolation -and to understand what their motivations and reasons are. Only  from  this  we  can  not  only  understand  why  the  Bolsonaro  Government  maintains  loyal followers in significant parts of the population, who understand that it acts well in the midst of the pandemic. Only on this basis can we also critically propose the conditions and ways in which an  instrumentally  effective and  morally  and  politically  legitimate  policy  to  combat  the  new coronavirus pandemic is possible.

References

AGAMBEN, G. (2008) Estado de excepción. São Paulo: Boitempo.

ARENDT, H. (2004) Responsabilidad y juicio. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

GAUCHET, Marcel. (2020) El espíritu crítico como el oscurantismo. Wires of Time (Ateliê de Humanidades), 1 de agosto. Disponible en: https://ateliedehumanidades.com/2020/08/01/fios-do-tempo-o-espirito-critico-como-obscurantismo-por-marcel-gauchet/

HAN, Byung-Chul (2020) El coronavirus de hoy y el mundo de mañana, según el filósofo Byung-Chul Han. El País. https://brasil.elpais.com/ideas/2020-03-22/o-coronavirus-de-hoje-e-o-mundo-de-amanha-segundo-o-filosofo-byung-chul-han.html

HOUTARD, F. (2013) El bien común de la humanidad. Quito: Editorial IAEN.INTERNATIONAL CONVIVIALISTE (2020) Manifeste convivialiste. Paris: Actes du Sud.

MBEMBE, A. (2018) Necropolítica: biopoder, soberanía, estado de excepción, política de muerte. Tradicional: Renata Santini. São Paulo: ediciones n-1.

SCHWARCZ, L. M. (2019) Sobre el autoritarismo brasileño. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

TOLEDO, Karina. Los datos del Amazonas refuerzan la teoría de que la inmunidad colectiva al SARS-CoV-2 puede llegar antes de lo previsto. Acceso el 10 de agosto de 2020 a las 3:20 pm. Disponible en:(https://agencia.fapesp.br/dados-do-amazonas-reforcam-teoria-de-que-a-imunidade-coletiva-ao-sars-cov-2-pode-vir-antes-do-previsto/33822/?fbclid=IwAR2-96Y331Q2tuxgNOmPjTuFK7vK4Rneqy16ynnNoUhW_6anBJf_9zesGxI

Published

2021-01-06