Geography, duality and complexity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51359/2238-6211.2020.246342Keywords:
Duality in the Geography, Complexity Theory, internal dialogues, new perspectivesAbstract
Duality is a feature of Western Knowledge and Geography, with moral and philosophical roots. Complexity theory brings new knowledges to understand dualisms, questioning hegemonies and unilateralities. Methodological (nomothetic-idiographic), scalar (global-local), thematic (physical-human) and epistemological (space-place) references were used. The rules and universality of space processes are not more important than the uniqueness and internal relations of the places that give rise to organizations and emergencies. Nonlinear local interactions can take on large proportions and affect the globality, with hierarchical classifications and descriptions becoming more flexible. The prior understanding of nature and society becomes secondary and inadequate due to the common archetype of the complex systems. The perspectives are for methodological, scalar, thematic and epistemological inter and intradisciplinary dialogues.
References
ALLEN, P. M. Coherence, chaos and evolution in the social context. Futures,v.26 (6) : 583-597, 1994.
ABLER R, ADAMS J. S., and GOULD P. Spatial organization. The Geographer’s View of the World. New Jersey: Pretince-Hall, 1971.
ALLEN P. M. Cities and Regions as Self-organizing Systems. Models of Complexity. Amsterdam : Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1997
AN L, LINDERMAN M and SHORTRIDGE A. Exploring Complexity in a Human–Environment System: An Agent-Based Spatial Model for Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (1): 54-79, 2005.
ARTHUR W. B. Complexity and the economy. Science 284 (2): 107-109, 1999.
BAK P. How Nature Works. New York: Springer, 1996.
BERDOULAY V. The contextual Approach. In Stoddart DR (ed) Geography, Ideology and Social Concern. London: Blackwell, 1981.
BERRY B., DOUGLAS K. and ELLIOTT E. Adaptive Agents, Intelligence, and Emergent Human Organization: Capturing Complexity through Agent-Based Modeling. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (ed A Sackler), New York, USA, 99 (10), pp.7187-7188, 2002.
BENNETT D., MCGINNIS D. Coupled and complex: Human–environment interaction in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA. Geoforum 39: 833-845, 2008.
Bithell M, Brasington N and Richards K. Discrete-element, individual-based and agent-based models: tools for interdisciplinary enquiry in geography? Geoforum 39: 625–642, 2008
BUSHKOVITCH A, V. Models, Theories, and Kant. Philosophy of Science 41: 86-88, 1974.
BOURDIE P. Les usages sociaux de la science. Pour une sociologie clinique du champ scientifique. Paris : INRA, 1997.
BURTT E, A. The metaphysicial foundations of Modern Science. New York: Dover Publications, 1954.
BYRNE D. Complexity theory and the social sciences: an introduction. London and New York: Ed. Routledge, 1998
CHAPURA M. Scale, causality, complexity and emergence: rethinking scale’s ontological significance. Transactions Institute British Geographers 34: 462–474, 2009.
CILLIERS P. Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems. London and New York: Routledge, 2000
CLAVAL, P. Epistemologia da Geografia. Florianópolis : Ed. da UFSC, 2014
CLIFFORD N. J. Models in geography revisited. Geoforum 39: 675-686, 2008
CULLING W. E. H. A new view of the landscape. Transactions of the Institute British
DATTA D., RAUT S. The arrow of time, complexity and scale free analysis. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 28: 581-589, 2006.
DAUPHINÉ A. Chaos, Fractales et Dynamiques en Ceographie. Montpellier: Reclus, 1995.
DE LANDA M. Intensive science and virtual philosophy. New York : Continuum, 2002
DEBRUN, M. A ideia de auto-organização. In: GONZALES, M. E. Q., PESSOA Jr. Autoorganização, Coleção CLE 18, Campinas, 1996, p.3-23
DEMERITT D., DYER S. Dialogue, metaphors of dialogue and undestanding of geography. Area 34.3: 229-241, 2002.
DURAND-DASTÈS F. La notion de chaos et la géographie quelques réflexions. L’Espace géographique n.4: 311-314, 1991
DUTRA GOMES, R. Ontologia Sistêmica: construção do espaço e perspectiva ambiental. GEOUSP, 25, 2009, pp.109-122.
EIGEN M. Molecular Self-Organization and the Early Stages of Evolution. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 4(2-3) : 149, 1971, 1997
EVE R. A., HORSFALL S., LEE M. E. (eds). Chaos, complexity and sociology: myths, models and theories. London: SAGE publications, 1997, 328p.
FOERSTER H. V. On self-organization systems and their environments. In: Foerster HV (ed) Observing systems. Seaside : Intersystems, p.02-22, 1984.
HAKEN H. Synergetics: An approach to complex dynamic systems. Advances in Applied Probability,14(2) : 197-197, 1982.
HARTSHORNE R. The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 29(3) : 173-412, 1939.
HARTSHORNE R. Perspective on the Nature of Geography. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1959.
HOLT-JENSEN A. Geography, its history and concepts. London: Harper and Row Publishers, 1981.
HOLQUIST M. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. New York: Psychology Press, 2002.
HUGGETT R. J. Dissipative Systems: implications for geomorphology. Earth Surface
JOHNSTON R. J. Geography and Geographers. Anglo-american Human Geography since 1945. London: Edward Arnold, 1979.
KANT I. Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Hackett Publishing, 1996
KAUFFMAN S. A. The Origins of Order: Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
KIRK W. Problems of geography. Geography 48: 357-71, 1963.
KWAN M. Beyond Difference: From Canonical Geography to Hybrids Geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (4): 756-763, 2004
LANE S. N, RICHARD K. Linking river channel form and process: time, space and causality revisited. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22: 249-260, 1997
LEPETIT B., PUMAIN D. Temporalités Urbaines. Paris: Ed Economica, Collection Villes, 1999.
LOVELOCK J. Gaia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979
MANDELBROT B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1983.
MANSON S. M. Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32 (3): 405-414, 2001.
MANSON S. M, O’ SULLIVAN D. Complexity theory in the study of space and place. Environmental and Planning A vol.38: 677-692, 2006.
MASSEY D. Spacetime,`science' and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24 : 261-27, 1999.
MATURANA H, VARELA F. The tree of knowledge. Biological basis of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications, 1987.
MAYR E. This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard University, 1997.
MEYER-ABICH A. The philosophy of nature in Alexander von Humboldt's “Views of Nature”. Acta Biotheor 18: 9-21, 1968
MOINE A. Le territorie comme un système complexe. Des outils pour l’aménagement et al géographie. Espace Géographique 35 (2): 115-132, 2006.
MORIN E. On the definition of complexity. In: The Science and Praxis of Complexity. Contributions to the Symposium held at Montpellier. Montpellier : UN University, p.62-68, 1985.
MORIN E. Method. The nature of nature. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1992.
MORIN E, LE MOIGNE JL. L'Intelligence de la Complexité. Paris: Edition l'Harmattan, 1999.
NIETZSCHE F. The Antichrist. In: Kauffman W (ed) The Portable Nietzsche. London: Penguin Books, 1976
O’ SULLIVAN D, MANSON SM, MESSINA JP. Space, place, and complexity science. Environmental and Planning A 38: 611-617, 2006.
PATTISON W. The Four Traditions of Geography. The journal of Geography 63 (5): 211-216, 1964.
PHILLIPS J. D, PERRY D., GARBEE A. R. Deterministic uncertainty and complex pedogenesis in some Pleistocene dune soils. Geoderma 73: 147- 164, 1996
PHILLIPS J. D. Divergence, Convergence, and Self-Organization in Landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89 (3): 466-488, 1999.
PORTUGALI J. Self-organizing cities. Futures 29 (4/5): 353-380, 1997.
PORTUGALI J. Complexity theory as a link between space and place. Environmental and Planning A 38: 647-664, 2006.
PRIGOGINE I. The End of Certainty. New York: The Free Press, 1997.
PRIGOGINE I. and STENGERS I. La Nouvelle Alliance. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1976.
RELPH E. An Inquiry into the Relations between Geography and Phenomenology. Canadian Geographer, 14(3): 193-201, 1970
RHOADS B. L. The Dynamic Basis of Geomorphology Reevisioned. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (1): 14-30, 2006.
RUELLE D. Hasard et Chaos. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1991.
SANTOS B. S. A Discurse on the Sciences. Review 15(1): 09-47, 1992.
SANTOS M. La nature de l’espace. Technique et temps, raison et émotion. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997
SCHAEFER F. Exceptionalism in geography: a methodological examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 43(3): 226-49, 1953.
SCHUMM S. A, LICHTY RW. Time, space and causality in geomorphology. American Journal of Science 263: 110–19, 1965.
SERRES M. The natural contract. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1995.SIVAKUMAR B. Nonlinear determinism in river flow: prediction as a possible indicator. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 969-979, 2007
SNOW C. P. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 2001. SPEDDING N. On Growth and Form in Geomorphology. Earth Surface Process and Landforms 22: 261-265, 1997
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rodrigo Dutra Gomes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à REVISTA DE GEOGRAFIA da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. CC BY - 
. Esta licença permite que os reutilizadores distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do material em qualquer meio ou formato, desde que a atribuição seja dada ao criador. A licença permite o uso comercial.
b) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
d) Os conteúdos da REVISTA DE GEOGRAFIA estão licenciados com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. CC BY - . Esta licença permite que os reutilizadores distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do material em qualquer meio ou formato, desde que a atribuição seja dada ao criador. A licença permite o uso comercial.
No caso de material com direitos autorais a ser reproduzido no manuscrito, a atribuição integral deve ser informada no texto; um documento comprobatório de autorização deve ser enviado para a Comissão Editorial como documento suplementar. É da responsabilidade dos autores, não da REVISTA DE GEOGRAFIA ou dos editores ou revisores, informar, no artigo, a autoria de textos, dados, figuras, imagens e/ou mapas publicados anteriormente em outro lugar.
