Homines in extremis: the lessons of fighting scholars.
Keywords:
habitus, Bourdieu, body, martial arts, carnal sociologyAbstract
I use the collection of “carnal ethnographies” of martial arts and combat sports assembled by Raul Sanchez and Dale Spencer under the title Fighting Scholars to spotlight the fruitfulness of deploying habitus as both empirical object (explanandum) and method of inquiry (modus cognitionis). The incarnate study of incarnation supports five propositions that clear up tenacious misconceptions about habitus and bolster Bourdieu’s dispositional theory of action: (1) far from being a “black box,” habitus is fully amenable to empirical inquiry; (2) the distinction between primary (generic) and secondary(specific) habitus enables us to capture the malleability of dispositions; (3) habitus is composed of cognitive, conative and affective elements: categories, skills, and desires; (4) habitus allows us to turn carnality from problem to resource for the production of sociological knowledge, and (5) thus to realize that all social agents are, like martial artists, suffering beings collectively engaged in embodied activities staged inside circles of shared commitments.References
Akram, Sadiya. 2013. “Fully unconscious and prone to habit: the characteristics of agency in the structure and agency dialectic.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43, no. 1: 45-65.
Boltanski, Luc. 2003. “Usages faibles, usages forts de l’habitus,” pp. 153-161 in Pierre Encrevé and Rose-Marie Lagrave (eds.), Travailler avec Bourdieu. Paris: Flammarion.
Boudon, Raymond. 1998. “Social mechanisms without black boxes,” pp. 172-203 in Peter Hedström and Richard Swedberg (eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1966. “The sentiment of honour in Kabyle society,” pp. 193-24 in John Peristiany (ed.), Honour and Shame. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in Algeria 1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1979] 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1989] 1996. The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1997] 2001. Meditações Pascalianas. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude Passeron. [1970] 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Connell, Robert W. 1983. Which way is up? Essays on sex, class and culture. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
Desmond, Matthew. 2007. On the fireline: Living and dying with wildland firefighters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, Paul. 1979. “Review Essay: On Pierre Bourdieu,” American Journal of Sociology 84, no. 6: 1460-1474.
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Farrer Douglas S. and John Whalen-Bridge. 2012. Martial arts as embodied knowledge: Asian traditions in a transnational world. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Harris, Mark. 2007. Ways of knowing: Anthropological approaches to crafting experience and knowledge. New York: Berghahn.
Herzfeld, Michael. 2003. The body impolitic: artisans and artifice in the global hierarchy of value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, Michael. 1995. At home in the world. Durham: Duke University Press.
King, Anthony. 2000. “Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’ critique of the habitus,” Sociological Theory 18, no 3: 417-433.
Leder, Drew. 1990. The absent body. University of Chicago Press.
Liechty, Mark. 2002. Suitably modern: Making middle-class culture in a new consumer society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marx, Karl. [1927] 1988. Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. New York: Promotheus Books.
Mears, Ashley. 2011. Pricing beauty: The making of a fashion model. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. [1948] 2004. The world of perception. London: Routledge.
Mouzelis, Nicos. 2004. Sociological theory: what went wrong? Diagnosis and remedies. London: Routledge.
Phemister, Pauline. 2006. The rationalists: Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Ryle, Gilbert. [1949] 2000. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Searle, John R. 1992. The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sanchez, Raúl and Dale Spencer (eds.). 2013. Fighting Scholars: Carnal Ethnographies of Martial Arts and Combat Sports. London and New York: Anthem Press.
Searle, John. 2009. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, Lawrence. 2011. Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy and Margaret M. Lock. 1987. “The mindful body: a prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1, no. 1: 6-41.
Suaud, Charles. 1978. La vocation. Conversion et reconversion des prêtres ruraux. Paris: Minuit.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2004a. Body and soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2004b. “Following Pierre Bourdieu into the Field,” Ethnography 5, no. 4: 387-414.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2005. “Carnal connections: On embodiment, apprenticeship, and membership.” Qualitative Sociology 28, no. 4: 445-474.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. “The body, the ghetto and the penal state,” Qualitative sociology 32, no. 1: 101-129.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2011. “Habitus as topic and tool: reflections on becoming a prizefighter,” Qualitative Research in Psychology 8: 81-92.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado




