Theoretical continuity or change of perspective: Articulation and antagonism within two periods of Ernesto Laclau's work

Authors

  • Leonardo Monteiro Crespo Almeida UFPE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2317-5427.2021.250935

Keywords:

Laclau, articulation, antagonism

Abstract

The main objective ofthis article is to clarify if Laclau ́slate discussion on populism, presented in On Populist Reasonintroduces a new perspective on two relevant concepts in  his  theoretical  work,  articulation  and  antagonism.  This  research  develops  a  general reading  of  the  uses  of  those  two  categories  within  two  relevant  work  in  Laclau ́s theoretical project, which are Hegemony and Socialist Strategyand On Populist Reason. Is it possible that in On Populist ReasonLaclau introduces a new meaning for those two categories in his political analysis or the meanings of articulation and antagonism remain unaffected by the very specific concern with populism in his late works.  We conclude that, despite many changes in his discourse theory, there is a theoretical continuity his use of the categories of articulation and antagonism.

Author Biography

Leonardo Monteiro Crespo Almeida, UFPE

Doutor em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito do Recife/UFPE. Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (2012), Bacharel em Direito - Faculdades Integradas Barros Melo (2010) e Bacharel em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (2009). Professor Permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Faculdade Damas da Instrução Cristã/FADIC. Tem interesse em pesquisar as temáticas de Subjetividade e Política nas interseções entre Teoria Social, Teoria Política Contemporânea e Teoria do Direito, tendo como principal referência teórica o pós-estruturalismo francês e teóricos por ele influenciados. Atualmente escreve e pesquisa a mencionada temática nas obras de Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida e Ernesto Laclau.

References

ARDITI, Benjamin. Politics on The Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.

AUSTIN, John. L. How to do Things With Words. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

GLYNOS, Jason & HOWARTH, David. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. 1. ed.London: Routledge, 2007.

HOWARTH, David, NORVAL, Aletta. J.& STAVRAKAKIS, Yannis. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.

HOWARTH, David&TORFING, Jacob. Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2005.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism. London: NLB, 1977.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Theory, Democracy and Socialism. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. New Reflections on The Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso, 1990b. p. 197–245.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Psychoanalysis and Marxism. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso, 1990c. p. 93–96.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 1995a. p. 20–35.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Why do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics? In: LACLAU, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 1995b. p. 36–46.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Subject of Politics, Politics of the Subject. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 1995c. p. 47–65.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Power and Representation. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso,1995d. p. 84–104.

LACLAU, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2005a.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Populism: What ́s in a Name? In: PANIZZA, Francisco (org.).Populism and The Mirror of Democracy. London:Verso, 2005b. p. 32–49.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Consideraciones sobre El Populismo Latinoamericano. Cuadernos del CENDES, v. 23, n. 62, p. 115–120, 2006a.

LACLAU, Ernesto. Why Constructing a People Is the Main Task of Radical Politics. Critical Inquiry, v. 32, n. 4, p. 646–680, jun. 2006b.

LACLAU, Ernesto & MOUFFE, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 1985.

LACLAU, Ernesto & ZAC, Lillian. Minding the Gap: The Subject of Politics. In:

LACLAU, Ernesto. The Making of Political Identities.London: Verso, 1994. p. 11–39.

LOXLEY, John. Performativity. London: Routledge, 2006.

MARCHART, Oliver. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007a.

MARCHART, Oliver. In the Name of the People: Populist Reason and the Subject of the Political. Diacritics, v. 35, n. 3, p. 3–19, 2007b.

MENDONÇA, Daniel de. Antagonismo como identificação política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 9, p. 205–228, dez. 2012.

MENDONÇA, Daniel de. O limite da normatividade na teoria política de Ernesto Laclau. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, n. 91, p. 135–167, abr. 2014.

MENDONÇA, Daniel de. Democratas têm Medo do Povo? O Populismo como Resistência Política. Caderno CRH, v. 23, n. 85, p. 185–201, 2019.

MENDONÇA, Daniel de; RODRIGUES, Léo Peixoto. Pós-Estruturalismo e Teoria do Discurso: Em torno de Ernesto Laclau. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs, 2014.

NORVAL, Aletta J. Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

PANIZZA, Francisco. Populism and The Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, 2005.

TORFING, Jacob. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.

ZIZEK, Slavoj. Beyond Discourse Analysis. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. New Reflections on The Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso, 1990. p. 249–260.

Published

2021-06-29

Issue

Section

Artigos