Entrevista de pesquisa e migração internacional de brasileiros: construções identitárias na relação com atividades de trabalho
Abstract
Focalizo, no estudo, a construção de identidades de imigrantes brasileiros nos Estados Unidos a partir de suas avaliações e/ou posições sobre o pertencimento ou não pertencimento a categorias sociais de trabalho por eles construídas na interação. As categorias em que se inserem não refletem reconfigurações das habilidades profissionais da nova ordem do trabalho. No retorno ao país de origem, há reconfiguração dasconstruções identitárias, mas a viagem permanece como ‘uma fronteiraaberta’ nas expectativas de vida e de desestabilização identitária dos imigrantes.References
ATKINSON, J. MAXWELL; HERITAGE, John. 1984. Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CANGLINI, Néstor García.1999. Consumidores e cidadãos: conflitos multiculturais da globalização. Rio: Editora da UFRJ.
DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y. S. (eds). 2006. O planejamento da pesquisa qualitativa: teorias e abordagens. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
FONTANA, A.; FREY, J. H. 2000. The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In: DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN, Y. S. (eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. EUA: Sage.
FRIDMAN, Luiz Carlos. 2000. Vertigens pós-modernas. Rio: Relume & Dumará.
GIDDENS, Anthony. 2002. Tribulações do eu. In —: Modernidade e
identidade. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, p.168-192
HOLSTEIN, J. A.; GUBRIUM, J. F. 1997. Active Interviewing. In:
SILVERMAN, D. (ed.). Qualitative Research: Theory, method and practice. Great Britain: Sage, p. 113-128
LINDE, Charlotte. 1997. Evaluation: a linguistic structure and social practice. In —: Life stories. New York: Oxford University Press.
HUNSTON, S.; THOMPSON, G. 2003. Evaluation: an introduction. In —: (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 1-27.
MÄKITALO, Asa; SÄLJÖ, Roger. 2002. Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: categories as situated practices. Text, 22(1)57-82
MISHLER, E. G. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and narrative. USA: Harvard.
PAOLETTI, Isabella. 2002. Caring for older people: a gendered pratice. In: STOKOE, Elizabeth H.; WHEATHERALL, Ann (eds.). Gender, language, conversation analysis and feminism. Discourse & Society, 13, (6): 805-817, nov. Special issue.
PEREIRA, Maria das Graças Dias. 2004. Imigrantes brasileiros de classe popular nos Estados Unidos: Construções identitárias na relação com atividades de trabalho, VIII Congresso Luso-Afro-Brasileiro de Ciências Sociais, Coimbra, 2004. Disponível no site do congresso http://www.ces.uc.pt/http://www.ces.uc.pt/)
SACKS, Harvey. 1992. Lectures in conversation. Cambridge: Blackwell.
SALES, Teresa. 1999. Brasileiros longe de casa. São Paulo: Cortez.
SCHFFRIN, Deborah. 1990. The management of a co-operative self during argument: the role of opinions and stories. In: Allen D. Grimshaw, Conflict talk: sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations. 2.ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 241-259
______. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge.
SENNETT, Richard. 2002. A corrosão do caráter. 6. ed. São Paulo: Record.
SHI, Xu. 2000. Opinion discourse: Investigating the paradoxical nature of the text and talk of opinion. Research on language and social interaction, 33(3): 263-289.
TANNEN, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversacional discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Maria das Graças Dias Pereira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Revista Investigações agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.