The King’s Hand and the Papal Ferula Gabriel Pereira de Castro, critic of Francisco Suárez
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22264/clio.issn2525-5649.2018.36.2.01Keywords:
Portuguese Regalism, Gabriel Pereira de Castro, Francisco SuárezAbstract
At the beginning of the seventeenth century, when the limits of ecclesiastical and civil jurisdiction were discussed throughout Europe, Judge Gabriel Pereira de Castro questioned Francisco Suárez's theses on the Pope's supremacy in matters involving religious property and persons. His main criticism dealt with the limits of the independence of the Church's tribunals in the face of the King's power. Father Suarez responded by reaffirming his theses on the autonomy of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The controversy was interrupted with the death of the Jesuit in 1617. The analysis of the debate reveals the Portuguese dimension of an important tension that marked the formation of the Modern State throughout Europe.
References
ASCH, Ronald; DUCHHARDT, Heinz. El Absolutismo, un mito?. Barcelona: Idea, 2000.
ALONSO, Santiago. El Pensamiento Regalista de Francisco Salgado de Somoza (1595-1665). Salamanca: CSIC, 1973.
AZOR, Juan. Institutionum moralium. Lyon: Cardon, 1613.
BENTES MONTEIRO, Rodrigo. O rei no espelho. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2002.
BOURKE, Richard e SKINNER, Quentin (orgs). Popular soveraignty in historical perspective. Cambridge: CUP, 2016
CALAFATE, Pedro. Da origem popular do poder ao direito de resistência. Lisboa: Esfera do Caos, 2012
CHERUBINI, Laertio. Magnum bularium romanum, tomo II. Lyon: Borde, Arnaud, 1697, p. 612-22.
CORREIA, Luís. Relectio ad caput inter alia de immunitate ecclesiarum. Porto: João Rodrigues, 1626.
COSANDEY, Fanny; DESCIMON, Robert. L'absolutisme en France. Paris: Seuil, 2002.
COZZI, Gaetano. Paolo Sarpi tra Venezia e Europa. Turim: Einaudi, 1979
DE MELLO E SOUZA, Laura. O Sol e a Sombra. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007
DE OLIVA E SOUSA, Feliciano. Tractatus de Foro Ecclesiae. Coimbra, 1649.
DE SOUSA, António. Relectio de Censuris Bullae Coenae. Lisboa: Pedro Craesbeeck, 1615.
FRAJESE, Vittorio. Sarpi Scettico. Stato e chiesa a Venezia tra cinque e seicento. Bolonha: Mulino, 1994.
GUIMARÃES PINTO, António. Humanismo e controvérsia religiosa. Lusitanos e anglicanos. Lisboa: INCM, 2006.
HENSHALL, Nicholas. The Myth of Absolutism. Londres: Longman, 1992.
HESPANHA, António Manuel. As vésperas do Leviathan. Coimbra: Almedina, 1994.
LE ROY LADURIE, Emmanuel. L'Etat Royal. Paris: Hachette, 1987.
LOPEZ, Juan Luis. Historia Legal de la Bula Llamada In Coena Domini. Madri: Gabriel Ramirez, 1748.
MARCOCCI, Giuseppe. I Custodi della Ortodossia. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2004.
MARCOCCI, Giuseppe; PAIVA, José Pedro. História da inquisição portuguesa. Lisboa: Esfera dos Livros, 2013.
MOTTA, Franco. Bellarmino. Una teologia política della Controriforma. Brescia: Morcelliana, 2005.
PEREIRA DE CASTRO, Gabriel. Ulissea. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbenkian, 2000.
PEREIRA DE CASTRO, Gabriel. Monomachia sobre as Concordias que fizeram os Reys com os prelados de Portugal nas duvidas da jurisdiçam eclesiastica e temporal. Lisboa: José Francisco Mendes, 1738.
PRODI, Paolo. Il sovrano pontefice. Bolonha, 1982.
PRODI, Paolo. Uma história da Justiça. Lisboa: Estampa, 2002.
PROSPERI, Adriano. Tribunali della coscienza. Turim: Einaudi, 1996.
SALGADO DE SOMOZA, Francisco. Tractatus de Regia protectione vi oppressorum appellantium a causis et judicis ecclesiasticis. Lyon: Prost, 1627.
SANGALLI, Maurizio. Cultura, politica e religione nella Repubblica di Venezia tra cinque e seicento. Veneza: Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, 1999.
SARPI, Paolo. Historia Particolare delle Cose passate tra il Sommo Pontefice e la Serenissima Republica di Venezia. Lyon, 1624
SUÁREZ, Francisco. Defensio Fidei catholicae et apostolicae adversus anglicanae sectae errores. Coimbra: Diogo Gomes Loureiro, 1613.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 .
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting an article to the CLIO Journal, the author guarantees that the article is original and that it does not contain calumnious or defamatory declarations, that it does not infringe upon any intellectual property rights, be they commercial, industrial or third party, as well as promptly reimbursing the Federal University of Pernambuco/ CLIO Journal for any indemnities, harm caused or costs which may occur because of any breach of these guarantees.
The author retains the copyright on the article, authorizing, however, the Federal University of Pernambuco/CLIO: Historical Research Journal to use of the article in question, in whole or in part, in edited or complete form, in Portuguese or in whatever other language, in printed form or in whatever other form of disclosure, the referred-to institution thereby being exempt of whatever payment of royalties to the author.
