THE THEORETICAL GENESIS OF A TEACHING MODEL AT UNIVERSITY

Walter Francis Walker Janzen

Resumo


This essay, as its title indicates, deals with the essential concepts that should be taken into account in the design of a didactic model for the teaching of the basic sciences -or any other discipline- at university. According to the argument developed, man and his characteristics should constitute the primordial conceptual axis. For this reason, the text briefly develops an anthropological framework, an epistemological framework, and a theoretical framework where these concepts and the needs of the model are inserted in relation to man. The anthropological framework deals with the problem of man and the relationship between the anthropological and the pedagogical. In the epistemological framework, the nature of learning in the sciences and the characteristics of the scientific disciplines. Finally, in the theoretical framework, the conjugation of diverse elements linked to learning and some essential characteristics that the model being sought should have.


Palavras-chave


Anthropos, Significant learning, Episteme, Didactic model, Dialogical relationship

Texto completo:

PDF EPUB

Referências


AUSUBEL, David y otros. Psicología Educativa. Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. Mexico: Trillas, 2009.

BUBER, Martin. ¿ Qué es el hombre? México: FCE, 1992.

DEL RE, Giuseppe. Models and analogies in science. International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, Vol. 6, N. 1, pp. 5-15, 2000.

FULLAT, Octavi. Homo Educandus: Antropología Filosófica de la Educación. Puebla: UIA, 2011.

GALLEGO, Rómulo. Un concepto epistemológico de modelo para la didáctica de las ciencias experimentales. Revista electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Vol. 3, Nº 3, Bogotá, 2004.

HANSON, Russell. Observation and Explanation: A guide to Philosophy of Science. Patterns of Discovery. An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundation of Science. Cambridge: University Press, 2010

MEDINA, Antonio. Elaboracion de un modelo didactico: base para la realizacion eficiente

de la tarea docente. Revista Española de Pedagogía Año XI. Nº 155, pp. 75-103. Junio-Septiembre, 1982

PLATO. Apology. Lisbon: Logos Editions, 2018.

PIAGET, Jean. The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge, 2001.

POPHAM, W. James. Criterion Referenced Measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1978

POPHAM, W. James. What’s wrong –and what’s right – with rubrics? Educational Leadership. Vol. 55. Nº 2, pp. 72-75, 1997.

POPHAM, W. James. (Coord.) Evaluación trans-formativa. El poder transformador de la evaluación formativa. Madrid : Narcea, 2013.

SIERRA BRAVO, Restituto. Técnicas de investigación social. Teoría y ejercicios. Madrid: Paraninfo, 1984.

VYGOTSKY, Lev. Thought and Language. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2012.




 

Licença Creative Commons
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.


                                         INDEXADORES

       
 
 
  
 
   
 
 
                                          BUSCADORES 
                                  


                                                      
                                           
                                              MÉTRICAS 
 
GOOGLE ACADÊMICO: https://scholar.google.com.br/citations?hl=pt-BR&user=BbrMvUMAAAAJ