Soil physical properties in a oxisol under a syntropic agroforestry system: row versus inter-row

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.2.p838-844

Palavras-chave:

Sustainability, water infiltration, agriculture, syntropical agroforestry.

Resumo

Synthropic agroforestry systems are agricultural systems designed to reconcile agricultural production with environmental conservation. However, the benefits related to soil physical properties of these systems have only been documented for the planting rows. Thus, the physical behavior of the soil in the inter-rows remains unknown. The objective of this paper was to characterize the physical properties of the soil in the rows and inter-rows of a syntropical agroforestry system - SAS. For this, infiltration capacity (mini-disk infiltrometer) and soil resistance to penetration (STOLF Penetrometer) were measured in five ramdomly located blocks involving the rows and inter-rows. The results showed that there were no significant differences between row and inter-rows for both variables. The high species diversity, continuous addition of organic matter to the soil via pruning, the absence of heavy machinery use, and the vigorous growth of exotic grasses in the inter-row are the likely factors that explain the absence of differences reported here. We conclude that the rows and inter-rows of a SAS behave similarly in relation to the attributes evaluated. This demonstrates that such systems are highly beneficial for food production as well as maintaining soil physical properties.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Sabrina Mendes Pereira, Doutoranda em Ciências Ambientais pela Universidade de Brasília - UnB

Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais pela Universidade de Brasília - UnB

Maurício Rigon Hoffmann, Universidade Federal de Brasilia

Agroforestry Business Consultant: Brasília, Federal District, BR

Luiz Felippe Salemi, Universidade Federal de Brasilia

Division of Life and Earth Sciences - University
of Brasília: Brasília, Federal District

Referências

Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., de Moraes Gonçalves, JL & Sparovek, G., 2013. Mapa de classificação climática de Köppen para o Brasil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift , v. 22 (6), 711–728. http://doi.org/10.1127/S0941-2948/2013/0507

Arévalo-Gardini, E.; Canto, M.; Alegre, J.; Loli, O.; Julca, A.; Baligar, V., 2015. Changes in Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Long Term Improved Natural and Traditional Agroforestry Management Systems of Cacao Genotypes in Peruvian Amazon. PLoS ONE, v. 10, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136784

Basche, A.; Delong, M. S., 2019. Comparing infiltration rates in soil managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis. Plos One, v. 14 (9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136784

Bauer, T.; Strauss, P.; Kumpan, M.; Guzmám, G.; Gómez, J. A.; Stiper, K.; PopescoU, D.; Guernion, M.; Nicolai, A.; W,, S.; ZALLER, J. G., 2017. Effects of inter row management intensity on soil physical properties in European vineyards. Geophysical Research Abstracts, v.. 19, 2017-2218.

Bhave, S. & Sreeja, P., 2013. Influence of initial soil condition on infiltration characteristics determined using a disk infiltrometer. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 19 (3), 291– 296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2013.808445

Blum, J.; Giarola, N. F. B.; Silva, A. P.; Gudes Filho, O.; Silva, S. G. C.; Eberhardt, D. N.; Araújo, S. R., 2014. Assessment of soil physical attributes at sowing row and inter-row under no-till system. Revista Ciências Agronômicas, n. 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902014000500004

Chen, C; Zou, X.; Singh, A. K.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, W., 2022. Effects of grazing exclusion on soil infiltration and preferential flow in savannah grazing systems. LDD - Land Degradation & Development, v. 33 (16), 3010-3022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4368

Das, B. S.; Wani, S. P.; Benbi, D. K.; Muddu, S.; Bhattacharyya, T.; Madal, B.; Santra, P.; Chakrabarty, D.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Basak, N.; Reddy, N. N., 2022. Soil health and its relationship with food security and human health to meet the sustainable development goals in India. Soil Security, v. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100071

Failache, M. & Zuquette, L. V., 2021. Soil water infiltration under different land use conditions: in situ tests and modeling. Brazilian Journal of Water Resources, v. 26, 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.262120210063

Fischer, J; Brosi, B.; Daily, GC, Ehrlich, P. R.; Goldman, R.; Goldstein, J.; Lindenmayer, D. B.; Manning, A. D.; Mooney, H. A.; Pejchar, L.; Ranganathan, J.; Tallis, H., 2008. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, v.. 6 (7), 380-385.

Fransluebbers, A. J., 2002. Soil Organic Matter Stratification Ratio as an Indicator of Soil Quality. Soil and Tillage Research, v. 66, 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987.02000181

Guillot, E.; Bertrand, I.; RumpeL, C.; Gomez, C.; Arnal, D.; Abadie, J.; Hinsinger, P., 2021. Spatial heterogeneity of soil quality within a Mediterranean alley cropping agroforestry system: Comparison with a monocropping system, v. 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103330

Götsch, E. Homem e natureza na cultura. 2 ed. Recife: Centro Sabiá, 1997.

Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D. A. T.; Ryan, P. D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics, v. 4, (9). https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia do Brasil – INMET. 2021. Normas Climatológicas. Brasília - DF. Disponível em: https://portal.inmet.gov.br.

Las Casas, G.; Ciaccia, C.; Lovino, V.; Ferlipo, F.; Torrisi, B.; Lodolini, E. M.; GiuffridA, A.; Catânia, R.; NIcolosI, E.; Salvatori, B., 2022. Effects of Different Inter-row Soil Management and Intra-row Living Mulch on Spontaneous Flora, Beneficial insects, and Growth of Young Olive Trees in Southern Italy. Plants, v. 11 (545). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040545

Le Bissonnais, Y.; Pietro, I.; RoumeT, C.; Nespoulous, J.; Metayer, J.; Huon, S., 2018. Soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean and tropical agro-ecosystems: effects of plant roots and soil characteristics. Plant and Soil, v. 424,303-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-34236

Lin, B. B. & Fuller, R. A., 2013. Forum: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities? Journal of Applied Ecology, v. 50 (5), 1161-1168.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12118

Ma, S.; Wang, L.; Jiang J.; Zao, Y., 2023. Direct and indirect effects of agricultural expansion and landscape fragmentation processes on natural habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, v. 351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108555

Mayer, S.; Wiesmeier, M.; Sakamoto, E.; HUbner, R.; Cardinael, R.; KuhneL, A.; KogeL-Knabner, I., 2022. Soil organic carbon sequestration in temperate agroforestry systems – A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, v. 323 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107689

Micollis, A.; Penereiro, F. M.; MarqueS, H. R.; Vieira, D. L. M.; Arco-Verde, M. F.; Hoffmann, M. R.; Rehder, T.; Pereira, A. V. B. (2016). Restauração ecológica com sistemas agroflorestais: como conciliar conservação com produção - opções para o Cerrado e Caatinga (1ª Edição) Instituto Sociedade, População e Natureza – ISPN / Centro Internacional de Pesquisa Agroflorestal - ICRAF [E-book].

Murta, J. R. de M.; Brito, G. Q.; Mendonça Filho, S. F.; Hoffman, M. R.; Salemi, L. F., 2020. Understanding the effect of na agroforestry system with high litter input on topsoil permeability. Soil Use Manage, v. 20, 802-809.https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12647

Neves, J. A.; Imperador, A. M., 2022. A transição Agroecológica: desafios para agricultura sustentável. Revista GEAMA, Scientific Journal of Environmental Sciences and Biotechnology, 8 (3), 05-14.

Pereira, S. M.; Jacobson, T. K. B.; Gomide, C. S.; de Paula, A. M., 2021. Características químicas, físicas e microbiológicas de sistemas agroflorestais em diferentes estágios sucessionais em Brasília. Revista Verde, v. 16 (3), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.18378/rvads.v16i3.8638

Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J., 2010. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. PNAS, v. 107 (13), 5786-5791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090545510

Puech, T.; Starkb, F., 2023. Diversification of an integrated crop-livestock system: Agroecological and food production assessment at farm scale. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment, v. 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108300

Roseto, A.; Borek, R.; CANALI, S., 2021. Agroforestry and organic agriculture. Agroforestry System, v. 95, 805-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00559-6

Sachs, J., 2010. Monitoring the world’s agriculture. Nature, 466, 558-560.

Santos, M. L.; Compagnon, A. M.; Pimenta Neto, A. M.; Arriel, F. H.; Cintra, P. H. M., 2020. Variabilidades espacial das propriedades físicas do solo em primeiro ano de colheita de cana-de-açúcar / Spatial variability of physical soil in first cane sugar crop year. Brazilian Journal of Development, v. 6 (5), 27667-27682. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n5-278

Santos, H. G. dos; Jacomine, P. K. T.; Anjos, L. H. C. dos; Oliveira, V. A. de; Lumbreras, J. F.; Coelho, M. R.; Almeida, J. A. de; Araujo Filho, J. C. de; Oliveira, J. B. de; Cunha, T. J. F. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. EMBRAPA Solos, 5ª edição, revista e ampliada, Brasília-DF.

Shi, X.; Qin, T.; Yan, D.; Tian, F.; Wang, H. 2021. A meta-analysis on effects of root development on soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma, v. 403 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115363

SIlva, A. P.; Ball, B. C.; Tormena, C. A.; Giarola, N. F. B.; Guimarães, R. M. L., 2014. Soil structure and greenhouse gas production differences between row and interrow positions under no-tillage. Scientia Agricola, v. 71 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162014000200011

Stolf, R., Fernandes, J. & Furlani Neto, V. L. Recomendação para o uso do penetrômetro de impacto modelo IAA/Planalsucar-Stolf, 1983.

Waldron, A.; Garrity, D.; Malhi, Y.; Girardin, C.; Miller, D. C.; Seddon, N., 2020. Agroforestry Can Enhance Food Security While Meeting Other Sustainable Development Goals. Tropical Conservation Science, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917720667

Wang, B; Verheyen, K.; Baeten, L.; DE SMEDT, P., 2021. Herb litter mediates tree litter decomposition and soil fauna composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 152.

Zilli, m.; Scarabello, M.; Soterroni, A. C.; Valin, H.; Mosnier, A.; Leclere, D.; Havlík, P.;

Kraxner, F.; Lopes, M. A.; Ramos, F. M., 2020. The impact of climate change on Brazil’s agriculture. Science of the Total Environonment, v. 740.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139384

Zhu, T.; Ringler, C.; Rosegrant, M., 2019. Viewing Agricultural Water Management Through a Systems Analysis Lens. Water Resources Research, v. 55, 1778-1791. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021007

Downloads

Publicado

2024-03-14

Como Citar

Mendes Pereira, S., Rigon Hoffmann, M., & Felippe Salemi, L. (2024). Soil physical properties in a oxisol under a syntropic agroforestry system: row versus inter-row. Revista Brasileira De Geografia Física, 17(2), 838–844. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.2.p838-844

Edição

Seção

Hidrogeografia e Recursos Hídricos

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.