Birds of Serra de Santo Antônio State Park, Campo Maior, Piauí, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v18.4.p3298-3315Keywords:
Birds, Diversity, Community structure, ConservationAbstract
This study was motivated by the need to understand the diversity, structure and conservation of the bird community in the Serra de Santo Antônio State Park, contributing to scientific knowledge, the elaboration of the Management Plan and the formulation of management strategies conservation. Its objectives were to identify which bird species are present in the area, what the structure and diversity of this community is like and how the species are distributed in the different trophic guilds. This study is aimed at researchers, managers of Conservation Units, ornithologists, and professionals involved in biodiversity conservation strategies in Caatinga, providing relevant information for decision-making. Two sampling campaigns were conducted during the dry and rainy seasons, using the Point Abundance Index (IPA) method, covering 105 sampling points, recording 161 birds species, of which six species are endemic to the Caatinga and one to the Cerrado. The bird community was characterized by high diversity, with a predominance of insectivorous species. No species were classified as threatened at the national level, but two were categorized as near-threatened globally. The results indicate the importance of the Serra de Santo Antônio State Park for the conservation of local avifauna and the presence of endemic species emphasizes the need for specific conservation measures, especially in the face of threats associated with deforestation, habitat loss, hunting, and illegal trade. The study contributes to the understanding of biodiversity in the region and provides support for effective preservation strategies.
Downloads
References
Araujo, H.F.P., Garda, A.A., Girão e Silva, W.A., Nascimento, N.F.F., Mariano, E.F., Silva, J.M.C., 2022. The Caatinga region is a system and not an aggregate. Journal of arid environments, 203. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104778. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Araújo, H.F.P., Silva, J.M.C., 2017. The avifauna of the Caatinga: biogeography, ecology, and conservation. In: Silva, J.M.C., Tabarelli, M., LEAL, I.R. (eds.). Caatinga: the largest Tropical Dry Forest regionin South America. New York: Springer, 181–210.
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A.,1993. Bird census techniques. London, Academic Press, 257.
Castro, A. A. J. F., Martins, F. R., Fernandes, A. G., 1998. The woody flora of cerrado vegetation in the state of Piauí, northeastern Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 55(3), 455-472. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428600003292. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Cepro, 1996. Diagnóstico das Condições Ambientais do Estado do Piauí. Teresina, 154.
Cueto, V.R., 2005. Las aves nómades de las zonas áridas del mundo. El hornero 20(2), 187-188. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v20i2.810. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Colwell, R.K., 2013. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples (Version 9.1.0)—User’s guide and application, Storrs, CT: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut.
Dean, W.R.J., Barnardi, P., Anderson, M.D., 2009. When to stay, when to go: tradeoffs for southern african arid-zone birds in times of drought. South African Journal of Science 105(1), 24-28. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v105i1/2.7. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Farias, R.R.S., 2003. Florística e Fitossociologia em Trechos de Vegetação do Complexo de Campo Maior, Piauí. Dissertação de Mestrado em Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife.
Farias, R.R.S.D., Castro, A.A.J.F., 2004. Fitossociologia de trechos da vegetação do complexo de Campo Maior, Campo Maior, PI, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 18, 949-963. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062004000400025. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Farias, G.B.; Silva, W.A.G.; Albano, C.G., 2005. Diversidade de aves em áreas prioritárias para a conservação da Caatinga, 203-226. In: Araújo, F.S.; Rodal, M.J.N., Barbosa, M.R.V. Análise das variações da biodiversidade do bioma caatinga: suporte a estratégias regionais de conservação. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species., 2022. Version 2022-1. Disponível: https://www.iucnredlist.org. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Ivanov, M.M.M., 2020. Unidades de conservação do estado do Piauí. Teresina: EDUFPI. 434p.
Kadmon, R., Allouche, O., 2007. Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory. The American Naturalist 170(3), 443-454. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1086/519853. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Lima, R.D., 2021. Birds of the Caatinga revisited: the problem of enclaves within, but not of, the Caatinga. Journal of Arid Environments, v. 191, p. 104537. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104537. Acesso: 23 mai. 2024.
MMA. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Sumário Executivo do Plano de Ação Nacional para a Conservação das Aves da Caatinga. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, 2019. Disponível: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/pan/pan-aves-da-caatinga/2-ciclo/pan-aves-da-caatinga-sumario.pdf. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Marra, P.P., Francis, C.M., Mulvihill, R.S., Moore, F.R., 2005. The influence of climate on the timing and rate of spring bird migration. Oecologia 142, 307-315. Disponivel: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1725-x. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Nascimento, J.L.X., 2000. Estudo comparativo da avifauna em duas estações ecológicas da Caatinga: Aiuaba e Seridó. Melopsittacus 3, 12-35.
Nascimento, M.S., 2022. Parque Nacional de Ubajara: a Avifauna e o Ecoturismo em um Brejo de Altitude Cearense. Tese de Doutorado em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, Piauí.
O’dea, N., Watson, J.E.M., Whittaker, R.J., 2004. Rapid assessment in conservation research: a critique of avifaunal assessment techniques illustrated by Ecuadorian and Madagascan case study data. Diversity and Distributions 10, 55-63. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00050.x. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Pacheco, J. F. et al., 2021. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee – second edition. Ornithology Research 29(2), 94-105. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Piacentini, V.Q., Aleixo, A., Agne, C.E. et al., 2015. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 23(2), 91-298. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544294. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Ricklefs, R.E., Lovette, I.J., 1999. The roles of island area per se and habitat diversity in the species–area relationships of four Lesser Antillean faunal groups. Journal of Animal Ecology 68(6), 1142-1160. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00358.x. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Rivas, M.P., 1996. Macrozoneamento geoambiental da bacia hidrográfica do rio Parnaíba. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
Roos, A.L., Nunes, M.F.C., Sousa, E.A., Sousa, A.E.B.A., Nascimento, J.L.X., Lacerda, R.C.A., 2010. Avifauna da região do Lago de Sobradinho: composição, riqueza e biologia. Ornithologia 1(2), 135-160.
Santos, M. P. D., 2004. As comunidades de aves em duas fisionomias da vegetação de Caatinga no estado do Piauí, Brasil. Ararajuba 12(2), 113-123.
Santos, M.P.D., Soares, L.M.S., Lopes, F.M., Carvalho, S.T., Silva, M.S., Santos, D. D., 2013. Birds of Sete Cidades National Park, Brazil: ecotonal patterns and habitat use. Cotinga 35, 48-60.
Scherer, A., Scherer, S. B., Bugoni, L., Mohr, L. V., Efe, M. A., Hartz, S. M., 2005. Estrutura trófica da avifauna em oito parques da cidade de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Ornithologia 1(1), 25-32.
Sick, H., 1997. Ornitologia Brasileira. Editora Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro, 912p.
Silva, J.M.C., Souza, M.A., Bieber, A.G.D., Carlos, C.J., 2003. Aves da caatinga: status, uso do habitat e sensitividade, 237-273. In: Leal, I.R., Tabarelli, M., Silva, J.M.C. (Eds.). Ecologia e Conservação da caatinga. Recife, Ed. Universitária da UFPE.
Silva, M., 2005. The Brazilian Protected Areas Program. Conservation Biology 19(3), 608-61. Disponível: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3591043. Acesso: 24 nov. 2023.
Silveira, L.F., Beisiegel, B.D.M., Curcio, F.F., Valdujo, P.H., Dixo, M., Verdade, V.K., Cunningham, P.T.M., 2010. Para que servem os inventários de fauna? Estudos avançados, 24, 173-207. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142010000100015. Acesso: 26 nov. 2023.
Sousa, G. L., Santos, K.P.P, Soares, R.R, Freire, S.M., 2016. Etnoecologia da Anurofauna em uma Área do Complexo Vegetacional de Campo Maior (PI), Nordeste Brasileiro. Educação Ambiental em Ação 57, 1-15.
Sousa, S.R., Castro, A.A.J.F., Farias, R.S., Sousa, G. M., Castro, N.M.C.F., 2009. Fitoecologia do Complexo de Campo Maior, Piauí, Brasil. Publicações Avulsas em Conservação de Ecossistemas 22, 1-25. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062004000400025. Acesso: 19 mai. 2024.
Souto, P.C., Souto, J.S., Miranda, J.R.P.D., Santos, R.V.D., Alves, A.R., 2008. Comunidade microbiana e mesofauna edáficas em solo sob caatinga no semi-árido da Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 32, 151-160. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832008000100015. Acesso: 25 out. 2023.
Stotz, D.F., 1996. Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press.
Telino-Júnior, W.R., Dias, M.M., Azevedo Júnior, S.M.D., Lyra-Neves, R.M.D., Larrazábal, M.E., 2005. Estrutura trófica da avifauna na Reserva Estadual de Gurjaú, zona da mata sul, Pernambuco, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22, 962-973. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000400024. Acesso. 29 nov. 2023.
Velloso, A.L., Sampaio, E.V.S.B., Pareyn, F. G. C., 2002. Ecorregiões propostas para o bioma caatinga. Associação Plantas do Nordeste. The Nature Conservancy do Brasil, Recife. 75p.
Vielliard, J.M.E., Almeida, M.D.C., Anjos, L.D., Silva, W.R., 2010. Levantamento quantitativo por pontos de escuta eo Índice Pontual de Abundância (IPA). Ornitologia e Conservação. Ciência Aplicada, Técnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento, 47-60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leonardo Moura dos Santos Soares, Marcélia Basto da Silva, Raimundo Coelho de Oliveira Filho, José Augusto Aragão Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to make their work available online before or during the editorial process, on academic social networks, digital repositories, or preprint servers. After publication in Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, authors are expected to update the preprint or postprint versions on the platforms where they were originally made available, providing a link to the final published version and any other relevant information, with proper recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.