Scientific manuals and their possible political developments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51359/2448-0215.2020.245770

Keywords:

Manuals, Sciences, Sociology of Knowledge

Abstract

The present text aims to do a reflection about manuals’ function in Humans Science and Exact Sciences. For that, the article uses the reflection of Bertrand Russell, Thomas Kuhn and Pierre Bourdieu. In this analytical movement, the manuals’ uses and knowledge were problematized. In short, it is an experiment of get to know better the developments of science filed in political field, using the manuals as a reference.

Author Biographies

André Campos de Camargo, UNICAMP

contato: camargo.andre.campos@gmail.com

Luccas Eduardo Maldonado, USP

contato: luccas_eduardo@hotmail.com

References

BAILEY, F. G. “Anthropology”. In: CLARK, Burton R.; NEAVE, Guy. (orgs). The Encyclopaedia of Higher Education, Vol. 3. (“Analytical Perspectives”). Oxford: Pergamon, 1992, pp. 1777-1787.

BOUEIDEU, Pierre. Campo Intelectual e Projeto Criador. In: POUILLON; et all. Problemas do Estruturalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1968, p.106.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. “O Campo Científico”. ORTIZ, Renato (org.). Pierre Bourdieu: Sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 1983.

LEVI, Primo. É isto o homem? Trad. Luigi Del Re. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco, 1988.

KUHN, Thomas S. A Estrutura das Revoluções Científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2000.

KUHN, Thomas S. “A tensão essencial: tradição e inovação na pesquisa científica”. In: KUHN, Thomas S. A Tensão Essencial. São Paulo: editora Unesp, 2011, p. 242-244.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. A Sociedade Científica. In: A Perspectiva Científica. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1956.

Published

2020-05-21