Effective strategies for teaching mixed-ability learners with differentiated instruction

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.51359/2448-0215.2025.265803

Mots-clés :

differentiated instructions, mixed-ability, multiple intelligences, individual diferences, flipped classes

Résumé

Teachers face difficulties while teaching mixed-ability classes because students vary greatly in their learning styles, rates of acquisition, prior knowledge, and capacity to evaluate and build on new knowledge. Slow learners will feel ignored and lose enthusiasm if the teacher concentrates on the more advanced students. Conversely, advanced students will become disinterested and may start making noise in the classroom if the emphasis is on slow learners. Therefore, educators should adapt their teaching methods to accommodate students' different demands. However, it takes a lot of time and effort from the teachers to prepare a lesson plan that addresses each student's level, meets the standards, and tries to deal with the anticipated noise. Aligned with several educational theories, this study recommends utilizing a flipped classroom model with technology integration to accommodate students' varying requirements and allow them to complete the lesson goals at their own speed. The study suggested useful strategies while creating group work. Students review the new materials before class at their own pace and then perform certain tasks inside the classroom following the teacher’s instructions. By fulfilling certain tasks, students demonstrate their professional understanding of the objectives while working in groups with mixed-ability learners in the classroom.

Biographie de l'auteur

Samir Sefain, Liberty University, School of Education

I hold a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Liberty University, USA, and a M.Ed. In the Art of Teaching and Learning from the university of Roehampton, London, UK. I taught ESL for over two decades in Canada and overseas. My scholarly contributions include multiple publications in the field  with emphasis on technology-integrated pedagogy. Additionally, I have mentored many student-teachers from various Canadian colleges.

Références

ADAMS, N. E. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, v. 103, n. 3, p. 152, 2015.

ALIAKBARI, M.; HAGHIGHI, J. On the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the enhancement of Iranian learners reading comprehension in separate gender education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 98, p. 182-189, 2014.

AL-KHRESHEH, M. H. The impact of cultural background on listening comprehension of Saudi EFL students. Arab World English Journal, v. 11, n. 3, p. 349–371, 2020. DOI: 10.24093/awej/vol11no3.22.

ALMEKHLAFY, S. S. A.; ALQAHTANI, A. A. J. The visual memory development technique: A remedial and pre-reading activity to enhance EFL learners’ motivation. Heliyon, v. 6, n. 3, e03627, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03627.

AL-SHAMMAKHI, F.; AL-HUMAIDI, S. Challenges Facing EFL Teachers in Mixed Ability Classes and Strategies Used to Overcome Them. World Journal of English Language, v. 5, n. 3, 2015. Available at: http://wjel.sciedupress.com. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v5n3p33.

AL-SUBAIEI, M. S. Challenges in Mixed Ability Classes and Strategies Utilized by ELI Teachers to Cope with Them. International Journal of Higher Education, v. 9, n. 1, 2017. Available at: http://ijhe.sciedupress.com. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p182.

ANDERSON, L. W.; KRATHWOHL, D. R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longmans, 2001.

ARISS, L. D. Differentiated instruction: An exploratory study in a secondary mathematics classroom. 2017. Thesis (Doctorate) – University of Toledo.

ASHTON, K. Approaches to teaching in the multi-level language classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, v. 13, n. 2, p. 162-177, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1397158.

BENMASSOUD, J.; EL MADANI, M. E. M. The teaching multilevel classrooms in Morocco: The case study of high schools in Meknes. GPH – International Journal of Educational Research, v. 2, n. 3, p. 1–14, 2019.

BISHOP, J. L.; VERLEGER, M. A. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (ASEE), Atlanta, GA, 2013. Proceedings... Atlanta: ASEE, 2013. v. 30, p. 1–18.

BLOOM, B. S. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Michigan: Longmans, Green and Co., 1956.

BOLLI, T.; RENOLD, U.; WÖRTER, M. Vertical educational diversity and innovation performance. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 27, n. 2, p. 107–131, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2017.1314075.

BORN, M. P.; STEGERS‐JAGER, K. M.; ANDEL, C. E. E. Inferring signs from purposeful samples: The role of context in competency assessment. Medical Education, v. 56, n. 1, p. 117-126, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14669.

ÇAKIROĞLU, Ü.; ÖZTÜRK, M. Flipped classroom with problem based activities: Exploring self-regulated learning in a programming language course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, v. 20, n. 1, p. 337–349, 2017.

CHOW, B. W. et al. Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, v. 27, n. 6, p. 1408-1430, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981399.

DAWSON, J. Q. et al. Designing an introductory programming course to improve non-majors’ experiences. In: ACM symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), 2018. Proceedings... ACM, 2018. p. 26–31.

DEBBABI, A. S. et al. A study of Saudi English foreign language (EFL) learners: Impact of timed reading on learners’ reading speed and comprehension. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, v. 14, n. 19, p. 3778–3782, 2019.

DEVANA, T.; AGUSTINA, A. Effect of screen text in improving students’ reading rate and comprehension. Jambi-English Language Teaching Journal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 1–79, 2019.

ELMALEH, J.; SHANKARARAMAN, V. Improving student learning in an introductory programming course using flipped classroom and competency framework. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2017. Proceedings... IEEE, 2017. p. 49–55.

FASSBINDER, A. G. O. et al. Applying Flipped Classroom and Problem-Based Learning in a CS1 Course. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. Proceedings... IEEE, 2015.

FIRWANA, S. S. The effect of differentiated instruction on learning English vocabulary and grammar among second graders in UNRWA schools. 2017. Thesis (Doctorate) – The Islamic University, Gaza.

GARDNER, H. Frames of mind: Theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

GARDNER, H. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 2011.

HAATAINEN, S. et al. A practice for providing additional support in CS1. In: Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, 2013. Proceedings... IEEE, 2013. p. 178–183.

HAZAEA, A. N.; ALMEKHLAFY, S. S. A. Timed reading activity for developing EFL students' reading skills in mixed-ability classes. Learning & Teaching in Higher Education Gulf Perspectives, v. 18, n. 1, p. 49-61, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LTHE-01-2021-0006.

HORDIINKO, N. M.; LOMAKINA, L. V. Teaching EFL to Mixed-Ability Classes: Strategies, Challenges, and Solutions. Advanced Education, n. 3, p. 38-42, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.44198.

HWANG, G.; ZOU, D.; LIN, J. Effects of a multi-level concept mapping-based question-posing approach on students’ ubiquitous learning performance and perceptions. Computers and Education, v. 149, 103815, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103815.

INDI, T. S. An Experience Report of Flipped Classroom Strategy Implementation for Java Programming Course. In: IEEE 18th International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 2016. Proceedings... IEEE, 2016. p. 240–241.

IYER, M. S. Flipped English as a Second Language (ESL) Classroom Approach to Scaffold the Slow Learners. Language in India, v. 19, n. 2, 2019.

KHAMDAMOVNA, M. U.; KARIMOVNA, K. S. The problem of teaching English in mixed ability classes. EостиЖения науки и образования, v. 5, n. 59, p. 40–41, 2020.

KHAN RANA, A. M. et al. Classroom practices for slow learners in the Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, v. 58, n. 1, p. 159, 2021.

KNUTAS, A. et al. The Flipped Classroom Method: Lessons Learned from Flipping Two Programming Courses. In: International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 2016. Proceedings... ACM, 2016. p. 423–430.

KOTHIYAL, A. et al. Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement. In: ACM conference on International Computing Education research, 2013. Proceedings... ACM, 2013. p. 137–144.

KOUTSELINI, M. Towards a meta-modern paradigm of curriculum: Transcendence of a mistaken reliance on theory. Educational Practice and Theory, v. 28, n. 1, p. 55–68, 2006.

LEVYKH, M. G. The affective establishment and maintenance of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. Educational Theory, v. 58, n. 1, p. 83-101, 2008.

LOCKWOOD, K.; ESSELSTEIN, R. The inverted classroom and the CS curriculum. In: ACM symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), 2013. Proceedings... ACM, 2013. p. 113–118.

MAGABLEH, I.; ABDULLAH, A. The effect of differentiated instruction on developing students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Management and Applied Science (IJMAS), v. 5, n. 2, p. 48-53, 2019.

MAGABLEH, I. S. I.; ABDULLAH, A. On the Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction in the Enhancement of Jordanian Students’ Overall Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, v. 13, n. 2, p. 533–548, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13237a.

MAHER, M. L. et al. Flipped classroom strategies for CS education. In: ACM symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), 2015. Proceedings... ACM, 2015. p. 218–223.

MAVIDOU, A.; KAKANA, D. Differentiated instruction in practice: Curriculum adjustments in kindergarten. Creative Education, v. 10, p. 535-554, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.103039.

MOHAMED, A. Designing a CS1 programming course for a mixed-ability class. In: Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE'19), 2019. Proceedings... p. 1–6.

MOHAMED, A. Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped teaching in a mixed-ability CS1 course. In: The 20th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'20), 2020. Proceedings... p. 452–458.

MOHAMED, A. Teaching highly mixed-ability CS1 classes: A proposed approach. Education and Information Technologies, v. 27, n. 1, p. 961-978, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10546-8.

NADDAFI, F.; VOSOUGHI, M.; KOWSARY, M. A. Inspecting mixed-ability group challenges within Iranian EFL public high schools: An exploratory study. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, v. 7, n. 27, p. 125–145, 2019.

PRASAD ADHIKARY, R. An analysis of the challenges and strategies of English language teachers in teaching mixed-ability classes: A qualitative inquiry. Revista Multi-Ensayos, v. 9, n. 18, p. 3-20, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5377/multiensayos.v9i18.16427.

RAHMAN, M. Teaching English Language to the Mixed-ability Classes at the HSC Level in Bangladesh: Challenges and Probable Solutions. International Journal of Ethics in Social Sciences, v. 6, n. 1, p. 29-50, 2018. Available at: http://www.crimbbd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/6.1.3a.pdf.

RAZA, K. Differentiated instruction in English language teaching: Insights into the implementation of Raza’s teaching adaptation model in Canadian ESL classrooms. TESL Ontario Contact Magazine, v. 46, n. 2, p. 41-50, 2020.

ROBERTS, J. The 'more capable peer': Approaches to collaborative learning in a mixed-ability classroom. Changing English, v. 23, n. 1, p. 42–51, 2016.

ROGERS, J.; REVESZ, A. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In: The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. New York: Routledge, 2020. DOI: 10.4324/9780367824471-12.

SAILAJA, S. S. ELT in Mixed Ability Classrooms - Teacher Challenges and Strategies in the Rural Context. International Journal of Academic Research, v. 5, n. 11, 2018. Available at: http://ijar.org.in/stuff/issues/v5-i11/v5-i11-a004.pdf.

SCHOONENBOOM, J. The multilevel mixed intact group analysis: A mixed method to seek, detect, describe, and explain differences among intact groups. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, v. 10, n. 2, p. 129–146, 2016.

SEBIHI, A. Strategizing teaching: Differentiated teaching style and learning brain. EPRA, v. 4, n. 12, p. 115-118, 2016.

SEVY, J. Teaching a large multi-level class using different strategies and activities to motivate English language learning. Studies in English Language and Education, v. 3, n. 2, p. 91-99, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v3i2.4934.

SONERIU, C. A. Classroom management in large and mixed ability classes. RATE Issues, v. 30, n. 2, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69475/RATEI/2023.2.8.

SUPRAYOGI, M. N.; VALCKE, M.; GODWIN, R. Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 67, p. 291-301, 2017.

TOMLINSON, C. A. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria: ASCD, 2014.

TOMLINSON, C. A. Teaching for excellence in academically diverse classrooms. Society, v. 52, n. 3, p. 203-209, 2015.

TOMLINSON, C. A. How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. 3. ed. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), 2017.

WATTS-TAFFE, S. et al. Differentiated instruction: Making informed teacher decisions. The Reading Teacher, v. 66, n. 4, p. 303-314, 2012.

WESELBY, C. What is differentiated instruction? Examples of how to differentiate instruction in the classroom. 2014. Available at: https://education.cuportland.edu/blog/classroom-resources/examples-of-differentiated-instruction/.

WROBLEWSKI, B.; MAJEROVA, M. Teaching strategies and techniques in mixed-ability classes. CASALC Review, v. 9, n. 2, p. 31, 2019. DOI: 10.5917/CASALC2019-2-3.

YUNUSOVA, A. A. Strategies for teaching in mixed ability classes. Международный академический вестник, n. 1, p. 34–35, 2019.

ZAKARNEH, B.; AL-RAMAHI, N.; MAHMOUD, M. Challenges of teaching English language classes of slow and fast learners in the United Arab Emirates universities. International Journal of Higher Education, v. 9, n. 1, p. 256, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p256.

ZHANG, J. et al. Investigating the influencing factors of teachers’ information and communications technology-integrated teaching behaviors toward 'Learner-centered' reform using structural equation modeling. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 22, 12614, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212614.

ZHUO, L.; QI-XIAN, G. The Application of Hybrid Flipped Classroom in the Course of Java Programming. In: 7th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), 2015. Proceedings... IEEE, 2015. p. 637–641.

Publiée

2025-07-04

Numéro

Rubrique

ARTICLES