Landscape reading under “ethno” aspect: a bibliographic study

Karen Veloso Ribeiro, Karoline Veloso Ribeiro, Emanuel Lindemberg Silva Albuquerque, Roseli Farias Melo de Barros

Resumo


Heterogeneity of landscape mosaics associated with factors that lead to the categorization of a given environment is summarized in an important research theme of Landscape Ethnoecology. Consisting of a recent theme, which has been receiving notoriety, the goal was to present an overview about the referred subject, analyzing its Evolution between the years 2009 to 2019, in order to verify how it has been proposed and discussed by scholars around the world. This research was organized using bibliometric analysis, whose data were obtained on the basis of the Journals Portal by CAPES. Main subjects of the considered texts related to the use and classification of the landscape, conceptual studies, perception of the environment and soil categorization. Among researches performed worldwide, the American continent was the one with the largest number of studies (64.7%). 2016 was the year with the highest number of publications, highlighting Brazil for grouping a larger amount of works compared to other countries. Brazilian researches were developed in areas of Caatinga and Atlantic Forest, lacking studies in different vegetation groups in the country. Data showed that the authors focused on identifying broader environments. Biotic and abiotic landscape elements gave strong indications to differentiate landscape mosaics, especially when they were associated with vegetation and topography elements. Finally, deepening the understanding of how people are entwined to the environment provides important paths to understand and manage a particular territory.


Palavras-chave


Literary Research, Ethnoecology, Popular Knowledge, Environment

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Alcorn, J.B., 1995. Ethnobotanical knowledge systems: a resource for meeting rural development goals. In: The cultural dimension of development, London, Intermediate Technology Publications, p. 1-12.

Almeida, G.M.A., Ramos, M.A., Araújo, E.L., Baldauf, C., Albuquerque, U. P., 2016. Human perceptions of landscape change: the case of a monodominant forest of Attalea speciosa Mart ex. Spreng (Northeast Brazil). A Journal of the Human Environment 45, 458-467.

Alves, A.G.C., Marques, J.G.W., 2005. Etnopedologia: uma nova disciplina?. In: Vidal Torrado, P. et al. (Org.). Tópicos em ciência do solo. Viçosa, Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 4, p. 321-344.

Amorozo, M.C.M., Viertler, R.B., 2010. A abordagem qualitativa na coleta e análise de dados em etnobiologia e etnoecologia. In: Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobiológica e etnoecológica, NUPPEA, Recife, p. 65-82.

Antrop, M., 2000. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture Ecosystems Environment 77, 17-28.

Araújo, A.L., Alves, A.G.C., Romero, R.E., Ferreira, T.O., 2013. Etnopedologia: uma abordagem das etnociências sobre as relações entre as sociedades e os solos. Ciência Rural 43, 5, 854-860.

Babai, D., Molnár, Z., 2013. Multidimensionality and scale in a landscape ethnoecological partitioning of a mountainous landscape (Gyimes, Eastern Carpathians, Romania). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9, 11, 1-21.

Barrera Bassols, N., Zinck, J.A., 1998. The other pedology: empirical wisdom of local people. Proceeding 16th International Congress of Soil Science Montpellier, ISSS/AFES, The Netherlands, 1-8.

Barrera Bassols, N., Zinck, J.A., 2003. Ethnopedology: a worldwide view on the soil knowledge of local people. Geoderma 111, 171-195.

Battig, W.F., Montague, W.E., 1969. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: a replication and extension of the Connecticut Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80, 2, 1-46.

Bell, S., 2001. Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 201-211.

Berlin, B., Breedlove, D.E., Raven, P.H., 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification: an introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan speaking community in Highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York, 684 p.

Bertrand, G., 1971. Paisagem e geografia física global – esboço metodológico. Cadernos de Ciência da Terra 13, 1-27.

Bertrand, G., Bertrand, C., 2009. Uma geografia transversal e de travessias – o meio ambiente através dos territórios e das temporalidades. Massoni, Maringá, 332 p.

Boillat, S., Serrano, E., Rist, S., Berkes, F., 2013. The importance of place names in the pearch for ecosystem-like concepts in indigenous societies: an example from the Bolivian Andes. Environmental Management 51, 663-678.

Bólos, M., 1981. Problemática actual de los estúdios de paisaje integrado. Revista de Geografia 15, 2, 45-68.

Bólos, M., 1992. Manual de ciência del paisaje – teoria, métodos y aplicaciones. Masson, Barcelona, 273 p.

Brierley, G.J., 2010. Landscape memory: the imprint of the past on contemporary landscape forms and processes. Area 42, 76-85.

Burenhult, N., 2005. Landscape terms and toponyms in Jahai: a field report. Working Papers 51, 1-17.

Campos, M., Velázquez, A., Verdinelli, G.B., Priego Santander, A.G., McCall, M.K., Boada, M. 2012. Rural people’s knowledge and perception of landscape: a case study from the Mexican Pacific Coast. Society and Natural Resources 25, 759-774.

Capra, G.F., Ganga, A., Buondonno, A., Grilli, E., Gaviano, C., Vacca, S., 2015. Ethnopedology in the study of toponyms connected to the Iidigenous knowledge on soil resource. Plos One 10, 3, 1-20.

Cargonja, H., Đaković, B., Alegro, A., 2008. Plants and geographical names in Croatia. Collegium Antropologicum 32, 927-943.

Chen, X., Hu, T., Ren, F., Chen, D., Li, L., Gao, N., 2014. Landscape analysis of geographical names in Hubei Province, China. Entropy 16, 6313-6337.

Cooke, B., Uma, K., 2001. Participation: the New Tyranny? Zed Books, London, 207 p.

Cope, M., Sara, E., 2009. Qualitative GIS: a mixed methods approach. Sage Publications Ltd, London, 182 p.

Costa, R.G.A., 2008. Os saberes populares da etnociência no ensino das Ciências Naturais: uma proposta didática para aprendizagem significativa. Revista Didática Sistêmica 8, 162-172.

Couto, H.H., 2007. Ecolinguística - estudo das relações entre língua e meio ambiente. Thesaurus, Brasília, 462 p.

Derungs, C., Purves, R.S., 2014. From text to landscape: locating, identifying and mapping the use of landscape features in a Swiss Alpine corpus. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28, 6, 1272-1293.

Diegues, A.C.S., 1996. O mito moderno da natureza intocada. HUCITEC, São Paulo, 169 p.

Elerie, H., SPEK, T., 2010. The cultural biography of landscape as a tool for action research in the Drentsche a National Landscape (Northern Netherlands). In: Bloemers, J.H.F., Kars, H., Van Der Valk, A., Wijnen, M. (Eds). The cultural landscape heritage paradox: protection and development of the Dutch archaeological-historical landscape and its European dimension, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, p. 83-113.

Ellen R., 2010. Why aren’t the Nuaulu like the Matsigenka? Knowledge and categorization of forest diversity on Seram, Eastern Indonesia. In: Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. New York and Oxford, Berghahn Books; p. 116-140.

Elwood, S. 2006. Critical issues in participatory GIS: deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS 10, 693-708.

Hoeschele, W., 2000. Geographic information engineering and social ground truth in Attappadi, Kerala State, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, 293-321.

Hunn, E.S., 1977. Tzeltal folk zoology: the classification of discontinuities in nature. Academic Press, New York, 368 p.

Hunn, E.S., Meilleur, B.A., 2010. Toward a theory of landscape ethnoecological classification. In: Landscape ethnoecology. concepts of biotic and physical space. New York and Oxford, Berghahn Books, p. 15-26.

Jett, S.C., 1997. Place-naming, environment, and perception among the Canyon de Chelly Navajo of Arizona. The Professional Geographer 49, 481-493.

Johnson, A., 1974. Ethnoecology and planting practices in a swidden agricultural system. American Ethnologist 1, 1, 87-101.

Johnson, L.M., 2000. A place that’s good. gitksan landscape perception and ethnoecology. Human Ecology 28, 2, 301-325.

Johnson, L.M., Davidson Hunt, I., 2011. Ethnoecology and Landscapes. In: Ethnobiology, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, p. 267-284.

Johnson, L.M., Hunn, E.S., 2010. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. Berghahn Books, New York and Oxford, 332 p.

Krohmer, J., 2010. Landscape perception, classification, and use among Sahelian Fulani in Burkina Faso. In: Johnson, L.M., Hunn, E.S. (Eds). Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space, New York and Oxford, Berghahn Books, p. 49-81.

Li, J., Mi, W., Feng, C., Yang, X., 2011. An analysis on toponym cultural landscape based on GIS application in Zhongwei County, Ningxia Municipality. Human Geography 1, 100-104.

Lopes, V.M., Ribeiro, S.C., 2016. Etnogeomorfologia e paisagem. Revista de Geociências do Nordeste 2, Número Especial, 212-220.

Machado, J.S., 2016. Caminhos e paradas: perspectivas sobre o território Laklãnõ (Xokleng). Revista do Museu Arqueologia e Etnologia 27, 179-196.

Marinho, J.R.O., 2013. A Etnopedologia e o olhar transdisciplinar sobre o papel da ciência do solo para o desenvolvimento rural do semiárido brasileiro. 2013. 98f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente). Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2013.

Mark, D., Turk, A., 2003. Ethnophysiography. Draft paper for presentation at the Workshop on Spatial and Geographic Ontologies, Switzerland.

Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G., Burenthult, N., Stea, Benjamins, J., 2011. Landscape in Language. Berghahn Books, New York, 449 p.

Martin, G.J., 1995. Ethnobotany: a conservation manual. Chapman & Hall, London, 268 p.

Mólnar, Z., 2012. Classification of pasture habitats by Hungarian Herders in a steppe landscape (Hungary). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8, 28, 8-28.

Montaner, J., 2008. Reciclaje de paisajes: condición posmoderna y sistemas morfológicos. In: Nogué, J. (Eds). El paisaje en la cultura contemporánea, Biblioteca Nueva, p. 233-248.

Naveh, Z., Lieberman, A.S., 1984. Landscape ecology theory and applications. Springer, New York, 360 p.

Neves, C. E., Salinas, E., 2017. Paisagem na Geografia Física integrada: impressões iniciais sobre sua pesquisa no Brasil entre 2006 e 2016. Revista do Departamento de Geografia Volume Especial, 124-137.

Nicolae, I., 2010. Camino de Santiago: place names and street names as border posts in the collective memory. Hum. Geogr. J. Stud. Res. Hum. Geogr. 4, 17-31.

Nunes Júnior, E., Barros Goes, M.H., Aguilar, R.A.S., Guerreiro, M. 2006. Etnogeomorfologia: aplicação e perspectivas. Anais do VI Simpósio Nacional de Geomorfologia e Regional Conference on Geomorphology, Goiânia, 1-1.

Penko, N.P., 2008. Significance of toponyms, with emphasis on field names, for studying cultural landscape. Acta geographica Slovenica 48, 33-56.

Pinheiro, D.A., Ferreira, B., 2015. A Etnogeomorfologia como possibilidade didática no contexto da Educação Ambiental. Revista do CERES 1, 2, 77-81.

Poderoso, R.A., Peroni, N., Hanazaki, N., 2017. Gender influences in the perception and use of the landscape in a rural community of German Immigrant descendants in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology 37, 4, 779-797.

Portal de Periódicos Capes/MEC. Disponível em: https://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/. Acessado em: julho de 2019.

Posey, D.A., 1987. Manejo da Floresta Secundária, capoeiras, campos e cerrados (Kayapó). In: Suma Etnobiológica Brasileira, Vozes, Petrópolis, p. 199-213.

Prasetyo, B., Chikmawati, T., Walujo, E.B., Amzu, E., 2018. Ethnoecology: the traditional landscape of Osing Tribe in Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 19, 6, 2003-2009.

Ribeiro, K.V., Ribeiro, K.V., Albuquerque, E.L.S., Barros, R.F.M., 2019. Do ver ao saber: etnogeomorfologia por moradores de uma comunidade rural no estado do Piauí. Gaia Scientia 13, 1, 1-10.

Ribeiro, S.C., 2012. Etnogeomorfologia sertaneja: proposta metodológica para a classificação das paisagens da sub-bacia do rio Salgado/CE. 278p. Tese (Doutorado em Geografia). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.

Ribeiro, S.C., 2015. Etnogeomorfologia sertaneja – estudo dos conhecimentos dos produtores rurais do sítio Canabravinha, Distrito de Palestina do Cariri – Mauriti/CE acerca dos processos morfodinâmicos. Geosaberes 6, Número Especial 2, 103-112.

Ribeiro, S.C., 2016. Etnogeomorfologia na perspectiva da gestão ambiental e aprendizagem na educação básica. Espaço Aberto 6, 1, 175-190.

Riu Bosoms, C., Vidal, T., Duane, A., Onrubia, A.F.L., Gueze, M., Luz, A.C., Gálvez, J.P., Macia, M.J., Reyes-Garcia, V., 2015. Exploring indigenous landscape classification across different dimensions: a case study from the Bolivian Amazon. Landscape Research 40, 3, 318-337.

Robbins, P., 2001. Fixed categories in a portable landscape: The causes and consequences of land cover categorization. Environment and Planning A 33, 161-179.

Sauer, C.O., 1925. The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications in Geology 2, 19-54.

Sauer, C.O., 2007. Geografia cultural. In: Correa, R.L., Rosendahl, Z. (Orgs.). Introdução à geografia cultural, Bertrand Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, p. 19-26.

Sheil, D., Puri, R.K., Basuki, I., Van Heist, M., Wan, M., Liswanti, N.R., Sardjono, M.A., Samsoedin, I., Sidiyasa, K., 2002. Eksploring biological diversity, environment and local people’s perspectives in forest lanscapes: methods for a multidisciplinary assessment. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, 92 p.

Shrestha, S., Medley, K.E., 2016. Landscape mapping: gaining “Sense of Place” for conservation in the Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal. Journal of Ethnobiology 36, 2, 326-347.

Silva, T.C., Medeiros, M.F.T., Peronic, N., Albuquerque, U.P., 2017. Folk classification as evidence of transformed landscapes and adaptative strategies: a case study in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil. Landscape Research 42, 5, 521-532.

Smith, B., Mark, D.M., 1998. Ontology and geographic kinds. Proceedings of the international symposium on spatial data handling, Vancouver, Canada.

Toledo, V. M., 2000. Indigenous knowledge on soils: an ethnoecological conceptualization. In: Barrera-Bassols, N., Zinck, J.A. (Eds). Ethnopedology in a worldwide perspective: an annotated bibliography. ITC Publication, Enschede, p. 1-9.

Toledo, V.M., 1992. What is ethnoecology? Origins, scope and implications of a rising discipline. Etnoecologica 1, 1, p. 5-21.

Torre, G.B., 2018. Las “otras” geografías en América Latina: alternativas desde los paisajes del pueblo Chatino. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 61, 33-50.

Tricart, J., 1977. Ecodinâmica. Fibge, Rio de Janeiro, 91 p.

Trindade Junior, E.E., Ferreira, B., 2015. A Etnogeomorfologia como proposta de análise dos desertos salinos do litoral setentrional do estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Nordeste do Brasil. Revista do CERES 1, 2, 82-8.

Tuan, Y.F., 1977. Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 248 p.

Tuan, Y-F., 1980. Topofilia – um estudo da percepção, atitudes e valores do meio ambiente. Difel, São Paulo, 291 p.

Tuan, Y-F., 1983. Espaço e lugar: a perspectiva da experiência. Difel, São Paulo, 248 p.

Turk, A.G., Mark, D.M., Stea, D., 2011. Ethnophysiography. In: Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G. Burenthult, N., Stea, D. (Eds). Landscape in language. Philadelphia, John Benjamins, p. 25-45.

Tuxill, J., Nabhan, G.P., 2001. People, Plants and Protected Areas. Earthscan Publications, London, 248 p.

Wartmann, F.M., Purves, R.S., 2017. What’s (Not) on the map: landscape features from participatory sketch mapping differ from local categories used in language. Land 6, 79, 1-16.

Wartmann, F.M., Purves, R.S., 2018. ‘This is not the jungle, this is my barbecho’: semantics of ethnoecological landscape categories in the Bolivian Amazon. Landscape Research 43, 1, 77-94.

Wehbe, M., Eakin, H., Seiler, R., Vinocur, M., Ávila, C., Marutto, C., 2006. Local perspectives on adaptation to climate change: lessons from Mexico and Argentina. AIACC Working Paper, Florida.

Wilcock, D., Brierley, G., Howitt, R., 2013. Ethnogeomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography 37, 5, 573-600.

Wilding, L.P., Lin, H., 2006. Advancing the frontiers of soil Science towards a geosciences. Geoderma 131, 257-274.

Xu, J., Chen, L., Lu, Y., Fu, B., 2006. Local people’s perceptions as decisions support for protected area management in Wolong Biosphere Reserve, China. Journal of Environmental Management 78, 362-372.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v13.4.p1914-1934

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

      

Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física - ISSN: 1984-2295

Creative Commons License
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License