Português
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.4.p2864-2879Keywords:
Unidade de Conservação, Capital Social, Iniciativas PrivadasAbstract
The Caatinga is a Brazilian biome that has lost about 15% of its vegetation cover in the last decade and one of the ways to protect its biodiversity is through the creation of a Conservation Unit (Unidade de Conservção, UC) by the National System of Conservation Units (Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação, SNUC). The Private Reserve of Natural Heritage (Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural, RPPN) is a type of UC that comes from the private sector and therefore represents an alternative to the type of conservation by public instruments. Nevertheless, there are many factors that influence its creation and maintenance. This work aims to map these units in the Caatinga ecoregions through Geographic Information Systems (GIS). And, jointly, to investigate the main motivations and difficulties of the owners for the establishment of the RPPN, through the application of questionnaires by e-mail. It was noted that within the Caatinga phytogeographic domain the highest concentration of RPPN is in the state of Ceara and that the motivations and difficulties of the owners are related according to the Social Capital (SC) in which they are inserted. That said, it is evident that the social interactions existing in a region or in a group of people are essential for the expansion of environmental conservation policies. And the creation of RPPNs represents the results of these private initiatives that contribute significantly to the New Social Movements (NSMs), increasing and diversifying the number of actors involved and decentralizing the focus of debates on environmental conservation. Nevertheless, it is necessary that all the agents involved and responsible for them perform their function, which does not happen among the units located in the Caatinga.
Downloads
References
Ab’Sáber, A. N. (2003). Os domínios de natureza no Brasil: potencialidades paisagísticas. Vol. 1. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial.
Andrade-lima, d (1981). The caatingas dominium. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, São Paulo, 4 (2),149-163.
Antongiovanni, M, Venticinque, E. M., Fonseca, C. R.. (2018) Fragmentation patterns of the Caatinga drylands. Landscape Ecology.33(8) 1353-1367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0672-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0672-6
Baquero, M. Construindo uma outra sociedade: o capital social na estruturação de uma cultura política participativa no Brasil. (2003). Revista de Sociologia e Política, 21, .83-108. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-44782003000200007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782003000200007
Bernades, J. A; Ferreira, F. P. M. (2003). Sociedade e natureza. IN: CUNHA, S. B., GERRA, A. J. T. (Org.). A questão ambiental: diferentes abordagens, 14-42.
Bolfarine, h., bussab, W. O. (2005). Elementos de Amostragem. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher Ltda.
Borges, L. A. c., Rezende, J. L. P. Pereira, J. A. Alves. (2009) Evolução da legislação ambiental no brasil. Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente, 2(3)447-466. http://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/rama/article/view/1146
Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. (1986) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, Ct: Greenwood,15-29.
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal.
Brasil. (1996) Decreto nº 1.922, de 5 de junho de 1996. Dispõe sobre o reconhecimento das Reservas Particulares do Patrimônio Natural, e dá outras providências. Brasília.
Brasil. (2006) Decreto nº 5746, de 5 de abril de 2006. Regulamenta o art. 21 da Lei no 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000, que dispõe sobre o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza. Brasília.
Brasil. (1981) Lei nº 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. Brasília.
Brasil. (2000a) Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Brasília.
Brasil. (2000b) Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 225, § 1o, incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Brasília.
Brazil, Ministry of the Environment. (2015) Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Brazil. Brasília.
Brazil Flora Group. (2015). Growing knowledge: an overview of Seed Plant diversity in Brazil. Rodriguésia, 66(4), 1085–1113. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201566411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201566409
Brondizio, E. S., Ostrom, e., Young, O, R. (2009) Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital. Annual Review Of Environment And Resources, 34 ( 1) 253-278http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707
Castelletti, h.,; Silva, J. M. , Tabarelli, M., Santos, A.M.M. (2003). Quanto ainda resta da Caatinga? Uma estimativa preliminar. Ecologia e conservação da caatinga, 777-796.
Claridge, T. (2004) Social Capital and Natural Resource Management: An important role for social capital). Master of Natural Resource Studies, School of Natural and Rural Systems Management, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N. D., Wikramanayake, E., Hahn, N., Palminteri, S., Hedao, P., Noss, R., Hansen, M., Locke, H., Ellis, E. C., Jones, B., Barber, C. V., Hayes, R., Kormos, C., Martin, V., Crist, E., … Saleem, M. (2017). An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial Realm. BioScience, 67(6), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014
Ellis, E. C.; Ramankutty, N. (2004) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front. Ecol. Environ 6(8) 439-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/070062
Fernandes, M. F., Cardoso, D., & Queiroz, L. P. (2020). An updated plant checklist of the Brazilian Caatinga seasonally dry forests and woodlands reveals high species richness and endemism. Journal of Arid Environments, 174, 104079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.104079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.104079
Fiaschi, P., & Pirani, J. R. (2009). Review of plant biogeographic studies in Brazil. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 47(5), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00046.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00046.x
Gomes, F. V. S., Santos, A. M. F., Guerra, R. G. P., Queiroz, L. R., Menezes, M. O. T., & Moro, M. F. (2022). Representatividade ecológica e extensão total de áreas protegidas pelas unidades de conservação no estado do Ceará, Brasil. Sociedade & Natureza, 34, e64481. https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v34-2022-64481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v34-2022-64481
IBGE. (2019a) IBGE Cidades. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/pb/panorama.
IBGE. (2019b). Biomas e sistema costeiro-marinho do Brasil: compatível com a escala 1:250 000. IBGE.
ICMBIO. SOBRE RPPN. Disponível em: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/criesuareserva/sobre-rppn. Acesso em: 14 out. 2019a.
ICMBIO. RESERVAS PARTICULARES DO PATRIMÔNIO NATURAL - RPPN. Disponível em: http://sistemas.icmbio.gov.br/simrppn/publico/. Acesso em: 14 out. 2019b.
Leal, I. R., Da Silva, J. M. C., Tabarelli, M., & Lacher Jr, T. E. (2005). Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the Caatinga of northeastern Brazil. Conservation biology, 19(3), 701-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00703.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00703.x
Leff, E. (2021) Ecologia política: da desconstrução do capital à territorialização da vida. Editora da Unicamp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788526815414
Mendes, K. R., Campos, S., da Silva, L. L., Mutti, P. R., Ferreira, R. R., Medeiros, S. S., ... & Santos e Silva, C. M. (2020). Seasonal variation in net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a Brazilian seasonally dry tropical forest. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 9454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66415-w
Moro, M. F., & Castro, A. S. F. (2015). A check list of plant species in the urban forestry of Fortaleza, Brazil: where are the native species in the country of megadiversity?. Urban Ecosystems, 18, 47-71. Moro, M. F., Macedo, M. B., Moura-Fé, M. M. D., Castro, A. S. F., & Costa, R. C. D. (2015). Vegetação, unidades fitoecológicas e diversidade paisagística do estado do Ceará. Rodriguésia, 66, 717-743.10.1590/2175-7860201566305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201566305
Moro, M. F., Nic Lughadha, E., Araújo, F. S., & Martins, F. R. (2016). A Phytogeographical Metaanalysis of the Semiarid Caatinga Domain in Brazil. The Botanical Review, 82(2), 91–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-016-9164-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-016-9164-z
Morsello, C. (2001). Áreas protegidas públicas e privadas: seleção e manejo. Ed. Annablume. Niemeyer, J., & Vale, M. M. (2022). Obstacles and opportunities for implementing a policy-mix for ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change in Brazil's Caatinga. Land Use Policy, 122, 106385. Olifiers, N., & Cerqueira, R. (2006). Fragmentação de habitat: efeitos históricos e ecológicos. Biologia da conservação: essências (CFD Rocha, HG Bergallo, MV Sluys & MAS Alves, orgs.). RiMa, São Carlos, 261-279. Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V., Underwood, E. C., ... & Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience, 51(11), 933-938.
Ostrom, E. (2000). Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept. Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, 172(173), 172-215. Overbeck, G. E. et al (2022). Placing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 56, 125687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2022.125687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2022.125687
Poque-González, A. B., Silvino, A. S., Macia, Y., Ferreira, L. C. (2023) Institutional conditions for the development of energy communities in Chile and Brazil. Sustainability in Debate, Brasília, 14(3), 105-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n3.2023.50472
Rabelo-Costa, T., Portal Gomes, P. W., Oliveira Rocha, B., Leite Cruz, I., Santiago Alves, R., Rocha de Sousa Oliveira, T., Passos Cordeiro, J. L., Ferreira Fernandes, M., Lughadha, E. N., & Freire Moro, M. (2022). The fate of Holoregmia, a monospecific genus endemic to the Brazilian Caatinga, under different future climate scenarios. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 155(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.90511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.90511
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (2016). State of the world's plants 2016. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
Silva, J. M. C. D., Barbosa, L. C. F., Leal, I. R., & Tabarelli, M. (2017). The Caatinga: understanding the challenges. Caatinga: the largest tropical dry forest region in South America, 3-19.Silva, J. L. S. E., Cruz-Neto, O., Peres, C. A., Tabarelli, M., & Lopes, A. V. (2019). Climate change will reduce suitable Caatinga dry forest habitat for endemic plants with disproportionate impacts on specialized reproductive strategies. PloS one, 14(5), e0217028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217028
Silvino, A. S., Viglio, J. E., & da Costa Ferreira, L. (2016). A conservação da Caatinga em diferentes arenas do Semiárido brasileiro. Sustainability in Debate, 7, 182-194.https://10.18472/SustDeb.v7n0.2016.18758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v7n0.2016.18758
Simões, S. dos S., Zappi, D., Costa, G. M. da, de Oliveira, G., & Aona, L. Y. S. (2020). Spatial niche modelling of five endemic cacti from the Brazilian Caatinga: Past, present and future. Austral Ecology, 45(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12825
Teixeira, L. P., Lughadha, E. N., Silva, M. V. C., & Moro, M. F. (2021). How much of the Caatinga is legally protected? An analysis of temporal and geographical coverage of protected areas in the Brazilian semiarid region. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 35(3), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0492
Teixeira, L. P. (2022). Modelagem de nicho ambiental de espécies vegetais da caatinga como ferramenta para avaliação dos impactos das mudanças climáticas e do progresso das ODS’s 13 e 15 no bioma semiárido brasileiro. Dissertação de Mestrado (PRODEMA, Universidade Federal do Ceará) http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/68387
Vanhove, M. P., Rochette, A. J., & de Bisthoven, L. J. (2017). Joining science and policy in capacity development for monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in the global South. Ecological Indicators, 73, 694-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.028
Velloso, A. L., Sampaio, E. V. S. B., & Pareyn, F. G. C. (2002). Ecorregiões propostas para o bioma caatinga. Associação Plantas do Nordeste. The Nature Conservancy do Brasil, Recife. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human
domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494-499.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mariana Dantas, Amanda Sousa Silvino, Marcelo Freire Moro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to make their work available online before or during the editorial process, on academic social networks, digital repositories, or preprint servers. After publication in Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, authors are expected to update the preprint or postprint versions on the platforms where they were originally made available, providing a link to the final published version and any other relevant information, with proper recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
