Uso da geotecnologia na aplicação da síntese de avaliação de impacto nos serviços ecossistêmicos de suporte na vegetação da Amazônia Legal

Celso DE Arruda Souza; Ernandes Sobreira Oliveira Junior; Sandra de Souza Hacon

doi:10.26848/rbgf.v18.6.p4322-4329

Authors

Celso DE Arruda Souza Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMATPPGCA – Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências AmbientaisCELBE – Centro de Pesquisa de Limnologia, Biodiversidade, Etnobiologia do Pantanal. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-9242
Ernandes Sobreira Oliveira Junior Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMAT PPGCA – Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências Ambientais https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-6917
Sandra de Souza Hacon Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMAT PPGCA – Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências Ambientais https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-0992

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v18.6.p4322-4329

Keywords:

Amazon Rainforest, Phytoecological, NDVI

Abstract

The support services available in the ecosystems of the Brazilian Amazon Forest translate into direct and indirect benefits of natural resources essential for life, providing various goods and ecosystem services, which benefit society by providing human well-being as habitat, regulating the climate, drinking water and food. In this way, the support service directly contributes to the formation of the soil and its fertility; nutrient cycling; primary production; and seed dispersal and pollination, which contribute to the biological biodiversity of the Amazon Rainforest. In this sense, the objective of this study was to quantify the change in land use and occupation in the phytoecological composition of the Amazon under the support service in Sinop and Alta Floresta (MT) in the period 1990 and in the year 2020. To carry out the work, the synthesis method of impact assessment on ecosystem support services (SAISES) was used with two scenarios: (I) loss of up to 50% of vegetation compromises the availability of the support service; (II) loss of more than 80% of vegetation has a negative impact on the provision of ecosystem services, and for the possibility of restoration, I use the average index (NDVI, year 2020).The results of the analyzes showed that changes occurred in Alta Floresta of 452,808 hectares, in Sinop 165,771 hectares. Compared to 1990, land use was smaller, Alta Floresta accounted for 166,405 hectares and Sinop 62,340 hectares. We concluded that there were changes in all phytoecological categories of the Amazon Forest in the municipalities of Alta Floresta and Sinop.

Keywords: Amazon Rainforest; Phytoecological; NDVI

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Celso DE Arruda Souza, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMATPPGCA – Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências AmbientaisCELBE – Centro de Pesquisa de Limnologia, Biodiversidade, Etnobiologia do Pantanal.

Possui graduação em Ciências Biológicas pelo Centro Universitário de Várzea Grande (2003–2007). Mestre em Ciências Ambientais Universidade de Cuiabá (2015–2017) Doutorado em Ciências Ambientais na Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso UNEMAT (2019–2023). Especialista em Meio Ambiente com experiência em Serviços Ecossistêmicos da Amazônia Legal e Socioambiental / Consultor em Projetos de Sustentabilidade / Gestão, Monitoramento e Diagnóstico em Unidade Conservação / RPPN /Licenciamento Ambientais/ Geoprocessamento. (CRbio 113204/01D ativo)

Ernandes Sobreira Oliveira Junior, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMAT PPGCA – Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências Ambientais

Bachelor's Degree (Biology) Education. Master Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation Education. PhD (Aquatic Ecology and Environmental Biology) Education. Institution/Postgraduate course to which it is linked: University of the State of Mato Grosso: Cáceres UNEMAT/PPGA.

Sandra de Souza Hacon, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso - UNEMAT PPGCA – Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências Ambientais

Graduação em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Mestrado em Controle da Poluição Ambiental -
Mancherter University, Reino Unido e doutorado em Geociências (Geoquímica Ambiental) pela Universidade Federal
Fluminense. Instituição/Pós-graduação à qual está vinculado: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública
Sérgio Arouca (ENSP), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública - Rio de Janeiro (RJ)

References

Alencar, A., Shimbo, J. Z., Lenti, F., Marques, C. B., Zimbres, B., Rosa, M., Arruda, V., Castro, I., Ribeiro, J. P. F. M., Varela, V., Alencar, I., Piontekowski, V., Ribeiro, V., Bustamante, M. M. C., Sano, E. E., Barroso, M., 2020. Mapping Three Decades of Changes in the Brazilian Savanna Native Vegetation Using Landsat Data Processed in the Google Earth Engine Platform. Remote Sensing 6, 902- 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060924.

Alix-Garcia, J., Rausch, L. L., L’Roe, J., Gibbs, H. K., Munger, J., 2018. Avoided Deforestation Linked to Environmental Registration of Properties in the Brazilian Amazon. Conservation Letters 1 p.1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12414.

Almeida-Maués, P. C. R, Bueno, A. S., Palmeirim, A. F., Peres, C. A., Mendes-Oliveira, A. C., 2022. Assessing assemblage-wide mammal responses to different types of habitat modification in Amazonian forests. Scientific Reports 1797,1-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05450-1.

Alves, P. A. S. S., Bampi, A. C., 2020. Gênese e desenvolvimento da cidade de Sinop e a relação com as atividades econômicas. Revista Equador 1, 230–245. https://doi.org/10.26694/equador.v9i1.9407.

Araujo, E. C. G., Sanquetta, C. R., Corte, A. P. D., Pelissari, A. L., Orso, G. A., Silva, T. C. 2023. Global review and state-of-the-art of biomass and carbon stock in the Amazon, Journal of Environmental Management, 331, 117251 - 117267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117251

Ballester, M. V. R., Garcial, A. S., Rizzo, R., Vilelal, V. M. F., Nakail, É. S., Preto, M. D. F., Casarin, L. P., Tourne, D. M., 2020. Soil functions and land management: Potential synergies and tradeoffs at the tropical agricultural frontier (Brazil). Land use Changes: Management and Applications 1, 59–81.

Barbosa, S. G., Spletozer, A. G., Roque, M. P. B., Ferreira Neto, J. A., Dias, H. C. T., Ramos, M. P., Bonilla, M. A. C., Ribeiro, W. S., Alcántara-De La Cruz, R., Zanuncio, J. C., 2018. Geotechnology in the analysis of forest fragments in northern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Scientific Reports 1, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22311-y.

Bendini, H. N., Fonseca, L. M. G., Matosak, B. M., Mariano, R. F., Haidar, R. F., Valeriano, D. M., 2022. Evaluating the separability between dry tropical forests and savanna woodlands in the Brazilian savanna using landsat dense image time series and artificial intelligence. em: international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives. Anais International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 43, 841-847. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-841-2022.

Berenguer, E., Armenteras, D., Alencar, A., Almeida, C., Aragão, L., Barlow, J., Bilbao, B., Bran-Do, P., Bynoe, P., Fearnside, P., Finer, M., Flores, B. M., Jenkins, C. N., Silva Junior, C. H. L., Lees, A. C., Smith, C. C., Souza, C., García-Villacorta, R., Reitor, U., David, J., Lima, F., (2021). Science Panel for the Amazon Drivers and Ecological Impacts of Deforestation and Forest Degradation. Em: Rede de Soluções para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável das Nações Unidas. Ed. Technical Report.

Biggs, T. W., Santiago, T. M. O., Sills, E., Caviglia-Harris, J., 2019. The Brazilian Forest Code and riparian preservation areas: spatiotemporal analysis and implications for hydrological ecosystem services. Regional Environmental Change 8, 2381–2394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01549-w.

Bispo, L. B., Silva, S. A. L., Garcia, M. L., Watzlawick, L. F., Mazon, J. A., 2022. Florística e estrutura de uma floresta ombrófila aberta submontana. Conservação e biodiversidade amazônica: potencialidade e incertezas. Sciences 1, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.37885/220508779.

Bousfield, C. G.; Massam, M. R.; Acosta, I. A.; Peres, C. A.; Edwards, D. P., 2021. Land-sharing logging is more profitable than land sparing in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 16, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2b5f.

Brancalion, P. H. S., Niamir, A., Broadbent, E., Crouzeilles, R., Barros, F. S. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Baccini, A., Aronson, J., Goetz, S., Leighton Reid, J., Strassburg, B. B. N., Wilson, S., Chazdon, R. L., 2019. Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes. Science Advances 5, 3223–3226. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav3223.

BRASIL, 2021. Lei n. 14.119, de 13 de janeiro de 2021.

Carneiro, B. M., Carvalho Junior, O. A., Guimarães, R. F., Evangelista, B. A., Carvalho, O. L. F. 2024. "Exploiting Legal Reserve Compensation as a Mechanism for Unlawful Deforestation in the Brazilian Cerrado Biome, 2012–2022" Sustainability 16, 9557-9569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219557.

Carvalho, R., Lisa Rausch, H. K. Gibbs, M. G. Bastos Lima, P. B., Valdiones, A. P., Vasconcelos, A., Silgueiro, V. 2024. "Illegal Deforestation in Mato Grosso: How Loopholes in Implementing Brazil’s Forest Code Endanger the Soy Sector" Land 13, 1828 - 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111828.

Carvalho Ribeiro, S. M., Soares Filho, B., Leles Costa, W., Bachi, L., Ribeiro De Oliveira, A., Bilotta, P., Saadi, A., Lopes, E., O’riordan, T., Lôbo Pennacchio, H., Queiroz, L., Hecht, S., Rajão, R., Oliveira, U., Cioce Sampaio, C., 2018. Can multifunctional livelihoods including recreational ecosystem services (RES) and non timber forest products (NTFP) maintain biodiverse forests in the Brazilian Amazon? Ecosystem Services 31, 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.016.

Coelho, G. C., 2017. Ecosystem Services In Brazilian’s Southern Agroforestry Systems. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 20, 475–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.2421.

Cremonez, F. E., Cremonez, P. A., Feroldi, M., Camargo, M. P., Klajn, F. F., Feiden, A., 2014. Avaliação De Impacto Ambiental: Metodologias Aplicadas No Brasil. Revista Monografias Ambientais 13, 3821–3830. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2236130814689.

Crouzeilles, R., Beyer, H. L., Monteiro, L. M., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Pessôa, A. C. M., Barros, F. S. M., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lino, E. D. S. M., Grelle, C. E. V., Chazdon, R. L., Matsumoto, M., Rosa, M., Latawiec, A. E., Strassburg, B. B. N., 2020. Achieving cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration. Conservation Letters 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12709.

Da Conceição Bispo, P., Picoli, M.C., Marimon, B.S., Marimon Júnior, B.H., Peres, C.A., Menor, I.O., Silva, D.E., de Figueiredo Machado, F., Alencar, A.A., de Almeida, C.A., Anderson, L.O., Aragão, L.E., Breunig, F.M., Bustamante, M., Dalagnol, R., Diniz‐Filho, J., Ferreira, L.G., Ferreira, M.E., Fisch, G., Galvão, L.S., Giarolla, A., Gomes, A.R., de Marco Junior, P., Kuck, T.N., Lehmann, C.E., Lemes, M.R., Liesenberg, V., Loyola, R., Macedo, M.N., De Souza Mendes, F., Do Couto de Miranda, S., Morton, D.C., Moura, Y.M., Oldekop, J.A., Ramos-Neto, M.B., Rosan, T.M., Saatchi, S., Sano, E.E., Segura-Garcia, C., Shimbo, J.Z., Silva, T.S., Trevisan, D.P., Zimbres, B., Wiederkehr, N.C., Silva‐Junior, C.H., 2023. Overlooking vegetation loss outside forests imperils the Brazilian Cerrado and other non-forest biomes. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 8, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02256-w.

De Arruda Souza, C., Oliveira Junior, E. S., Hacon, S. S., 2024a. Serviços Ecossistêmicos da Amazônia Brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física 17, 178–198. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.1.p178-198.

De Arruda Souza, C., Oliveira Junior, E. S., Souza Hacon, S. S., 2024b. Conceito de serviços ecossistêmicos: desdobramento na ciência e política. Revista Brasileira De Geografia Física, 17, 4260–4277. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.6.p4260-4277.

De Souza, J. P., De Carvalho Gonçalves, J. F., Jaquetti, R. K., Da Costa, K. C. P., De Lima, R. M. B., Fearnside, P. M., Nina Junior, A., 2023. Silvicultural interventions and agroforestry systems increase the economic and ecological value of Bertholletia excelsa plantations in the Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 97, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00798-9.

Decaëns, T., Martins, M. B., Feijoo, A., Oszwald, J., Dolédec, S., Mathieu, J., Arnaud De Sartre, X., Bonilla, D., Brown, G. G., Cuellar Criollo, Y. A., Dubs, F., Furtado, I. S., Gond, V., Gordillo, E., Le Clec’h, S., Marichal, R., Mitja, D.; De Souza, I. M., Praxedes, C., Rougerie, R., Ruiz, D. H., Otero, J. T., Sanabria, C., Velasquez, A., Zararte, L. E. M., Lavelle, P., 2018. Biodiversity loss along a gradient of deforestation in Amazonian agricultural landscapes. Conservation Biology 32, 1380–1391. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13206.

Fearnside, P. M., 2019. DEFORESTATION IN BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA: THE EFFECT OF POPULATION AND LAND TENURE. Ambio-Journal of Human Environment Research and Management. 1 ed. INPA. Disponível: http://inct-servamb.inpa.gov.br/publ_livres/Preprints/ 1993/ C-WOOD-M-AMB.pdf. Acesso: 23 fev 2020.

Fearnside, P. M., 2022. Destruição e conservação da floresta Amazônica. 1 ed. INPA. Disponível: www.gov.br/inpa. Acesso: 23 fev. 2022.

Fernandes, G., Laerte, R., Ferreira, G., Ferreira, N. C., Ferreira, M. E., 2011. Detecção de desmatamentos no bioma cerrado entre 2002 e 2009: padrões, tendências e impactos. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia 63, 341–349. https://doi.org/10.14393/rbcv63n3-43744.

Ferreira, A. C. S., Pinheiro, E. F. M., Costa, E. M., Marcos Bacis Ceddia, M. B. 2023. Predicting soil carbon stock in remote areas of the Central Amazon region using machine learning techniques, Geoderma Regional, 32, 614 – 626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00614.

Feitosa, T. B., Fernandes, M. M., Santos, C. A. G., Silva, R. M., Garcia, J. R., Filho, R. N. A., Fernandes, M. R. M., Cunha, E. R. 2023. Assessing economic and ecological impacts of carbon stock and land use changes in Brazil's Amazon Forest: A 2050 projection, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 41,64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.009.

Fortin, J. A., Cardille, J. A., Perez, E., 2020. Multi-sensor detection of forest-cover change across 45 years in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Remote Sensing of Environment, 238, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111266.

Franco, A. L. C., Sobral, B. W., Silva, A. L. C., Wall, D. H., 2019. Amazonian deforestation and soil biodiversity. Conservation Biology 33, 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13234.

Gastauer, M., Cavalcante, R. B. L., Caldeira, C. F., Nunes, S. S., 2020. Structural Hurdles to Large-Scale Forest Restoration in the Brazilian Amazon. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.593557.

Girardin, C. A. J., Jenkins, S., Seddon, N., Allen, M., Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Griscom, B. W., Malhi, Y., 2021. Nature-based solutions can help cool the planet-if we act now. Nature 593, 191-194. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01241-2.

Huang, Y., Gan, X., Feng, Y., Li, J., Niu, S., Zhou, B., 2024. A new framework for assessing ecosystem health with consideration of the sustainable supply of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 39, 37 - 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01834-y.

IBGE, 2012. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro.

IBGE, 2015. Manual técnico de pedologia. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro.

IBGE, 2009. Manual técnico de geomorfologia. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro.

IBGE, 2021 Bacias e divisões hidrográficas do Brasil. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro.

ICV. Instituto Centro de Vida. (2019). Características do Desmatamento na Amazônia Mato-Grossense em 2022. Ed 1. Disponível:acervo.socioambiental.org/sites/default/files/documents/m1d00036.pdf. Acesso: 13 set. 2024.

INPE. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. (2019). Metodologia Utilizada nos Projetos PRODES e DETER. 1 ed. São Paulo.

Koch, N., Zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J., Wehkamp, J., Oliveira Filho, F. J. B., Schwerhoff, G., 2019. Agricultural Productivity and Forest Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Oxford University Press 3, 919-940. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay110.

Lapola, D. M., Pinho, P., Barlow, J., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Berenguer, E., Carmenta, R., Liddy, H. M., Seixas, H., Silva, C. V. J., Silva-Junior, C. H. L., Alencar, A. A. C., Anderson, L. O., Armenteras, D. P., Brovkin, V., Calders, K., Chambers, J., Chini, L., Costa, M. H., Faria, B. L., Fearnside, P. M., Ferreira, J., Gatti, L., Hugo Gutierrez-Velez, V., Han, Z., Hibbard, K., Koven, C., Lawrence, P., Pongratz, J., Portela, B. T. T., Rounsevell, M., Ruane, A. C., Schaldach, R., Da Silva, S. S., Von Randow, C., Walker, W. S., 2023. The drivers and impacts of Amazon Forest degradation Extended summary. Science 379, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp8622.

Lewis, K., Barros, F. De V., Moonlight, P. W., Hill, T. C., Oliveira, R. S., Schmidt, I. B., Sampaio, A. B., Pennington, R. T., Rowland, L., 2023. Identifying hotspots for ecosystem restoration across heterogeneous tropical savannah-dominated regions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences1867, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0075

Lin, K. T., Pan, S. Y., Yuan, M. H., Guo, H. Y., & Huang, Y. C., 2024. Quantifying and monetarizing cropland ecosystem services towards sustainable soil management. Ecological Indicators, 159, 111751 - 111769.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111751

Lopes, T. R., Moura, L. B., Nasimento, J. G., Fraga Junior, L. S., Zolin, C. A., Duarte, S. N., Folegatti, M. V., Santos, O. N. A., 2020. Priority areas for forest restoration aiming at the maintenance of water resources in a basin in the Cerrado/ Amazon ecotone, Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 102630, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102630.

Lourençoni, T., Da Silva Junior, C. A., Lima, M., Teodoro, P. E., Pelissari, T. D., Dos Santos, R. G., Teodoro, L. P. R., Luz, I. M., Rossi, F. S., 2021. Advance of soy commodity in the southern Amazonia with deforestation via PRODES and Imazon Geo: a moratorium-based approach. Scientific Reports 1, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01350-y.

Luize, B. G., Bauman, D., ter Steege, H., Palma-Silva, C., do Amaral, I. L., de Souza Coelho, L., de Almeida Matos, F. D., de Andrade Lima Filho, D., Salomão, R. P., Wittmann, F., Castilho, C. V., de Jesus Veiga Carim, M., Guevara, J. E., Phillips, O. L., Magnusson, W. E., Sabatier, D., Revilla, J. D. C., Molino, J.-F., Irume, M. V. … Dexter, K. G. 2024. Geography and ecology shape the phylogenetic composition of Amazonian tree communities. Journal of Biogeography, 51, 1163–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14816.

Maeda, E. E., Abera, T. A., Siljander, M., Aragão, L. E. O. C., De Moura, Y. M., Heiskanen, J., 2021. Large-scale commodity agriculture exacerbates the climatic impacts of Amazonian deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 7, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023787118.

MEA. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Desertification Synthesis. Millennium ed. Washington. Disponível: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document. 356.aspx.pdf. Acesso: 20 out. 2020.

Nóbrega, R. L. B., Ziembowicz, T., Torres, G. N., Guzha, A. C., Amorim, R. S. S., Cardoso, D., Johnson, M. S., Santos, T. G., Couto, E., Gerold, G., 2020. Ecosystem services of a functionally diverse riparian zone in the Amazon–Cerrado agricultural frontier. Global Ecology and Conservation 1, 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00819.

Nolander, C., Lundmark, R., 2024. A Review of Forest Ecosystem Services and Their Spatial Value Characteristics. Forests, 15, 919 -932. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060919.

Owuor, M.A., Santos, T.M., Otieno, P., Mazzuco, A.C., Iheaturu, C.J., Bernardino, A.F., 2024. Flow of mangrove ecosystem services to coastal communities in the Brazilian Amazon. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1329006

Parente, L., Mesquita, V., Miziara, F., Baumann, L., Ferreira, L., 2019. Assessing the pasturelands and livestock dynamics in Brazil, from 1985 to 2017: A novel approach based on high spatial resolution imagery and Google Earth Engine cloud computing. Remote Sensing of Environment 111301, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111301.

Pereira, E. J. A. L., De Santana Ribeiro, L. C., Da Silva Freitas, L. F., De Barros Pereira, H. B., 2020. Brazilian policy and agribusiness damage the Amazon rainforest. Land Use Policy 92, 104491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104491.

Perschke, M. J., Harris, L. R., Sink, K. J., Lombard, A. T., 2024. Systematic conservation planning for people and nature: Biodiversity, ecosystem services, and equitable benefit sharing, Ecosystem Services,68,101637 – 101644.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101637.

Pimentel, G., Pires, S. H., 1992. Metodologias de avaliação de impacto ambiental: aplicações e seus limites. Revista Administração Pública,1 56–68.

Pires, M. M., Benchimol, M., Cruz, L. R., Peres, C. A., 2023.Terrestrial food web complexity in Amazonian forests decays with habitat loss. Current Biology 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.066.

Preto, M. F., Garcia, A. S., Nakai, É. S., Casarin, L. P., Vilela, V. M. F. N., Ballester, M. V. R., 2022. The role of environmental legislation and land use patterns on riparian deforestation dynamics in an Amazonian agricultural frontier (MT, Brazil). Land Use Policy 106132, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106132.

REFLORA. Flora Brasileira. (2022). Disponível: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br /reflora/PrincipalUC/PrincipalUC.do. Acesso: 1 jan. 2023.

Rodrigues, S. B.; Freitas, M. G.; Campos-Filho, E. M.; Do Carmo, G. H. P.; Da Veiga, J. M.; Junqueira, R. G. P.; Vieira, D. L. M., 2019. Direct seeded and colonizing species guarantee successful early restoration of South Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management 451 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117559.

Sano, E. E., Rodrigues, A. A., Martins, E. S., Bettiol, G. M., Bustamante, M. M. C., Bezerra, A. S., Couto, A. F., Vasconcelos, V., Schüler, J., Bolfe, E. L., 2019. Cerrado ecoregions: A spatial framework to assess and prioritize Brazilian savanna environmental diversity for conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.108.

Sangha, K., Ahammad, R., Russell-Smith, J., Costanza, R., 2024. Payments for Ecosystem Services opportunities for emerging Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Indigenous perspectives from Australia, Ecosystem Services, 66, 101600 – 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101600.

Spletozer, A. G., Rodrigues, L., Dos Santos, C. R., Koch, A. K., Zanuncio, J. C., & Soares-Lopes, C. R. A., 2023. Composition and structure of tree species in two forest fragments in southern amazon region. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 46, 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-022-00863-8.

Shibu, J., 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforest Syst 76, 1–10.

Silva, R. V., Souza, C. A., Ferreira, E., 2022. As transformações sociais, econômicas e ambientais no município de Sinop, Mato Grosso. Research, Society and Development 12, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34229.

Silva, M. C., Moonlight, P., Oliveira, R. S., Pennington, R. T., Rowland, L., 2022.Toward diverse seed sourcing to upscale ecological restoration in the Brazilian Cerrado. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 1147, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1045591.

Silva, R. M., Lopes, A. G., Santos, C. A. G. 2023. Deforestation and fires in the Brazilian Amazon from 2001 to 2020: Impacts on rainfall variability and land surface temperature, Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116664 - 11679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116664

Silva, S. D. P., Santos, S. B., Pereira, P. C. G., Melo, M. R. S., Eugenio, F. C. 2021. Landscape analysis in a municipality in the arc of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest, Ecological Engineering, 173, 106417 – 106429 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.10641.

Solen, L. C., Nicolas, J., De Sartre Xavier, A., Thibaud, D., Simon, D., Michel, G., Johan, O., 2018. Impacts of Agricultural Practices and Individual Life Characteristics on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study on Family Farmers in the Context of an Amazonian Pioneer Front. Environmental Management 61, 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1004-y.

Souza Mello, I., Soares, G., Duarte, D., Neto, G. G., 2015. Sinopse de fabaceae-caesalpinioideae para a flora de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Biodiversidade 14, 43–49.

Strassburg, B. B. N., Beyer, H. L., Crouzeilles, R., Iribarrem, A., Barros, F., De Siqueira, M. F., Sánchez-Tapia, A., Balmford, A., Sansevero, J. B. B., Brancalion, P. H. S., Broadbent, E. N., Chazdon, R. L., Filho, A. O., Gardner, T. A., Gordon, A., Latawiec, A., Loyola, R., Metzger, J. P., Mills, M., Possingham, H. P., Rodrigues, R. R., Scaramuzza, C. A. M., Scarano, F. R., Tambosi, L., Uriarte, M., 2019. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nature Ecology and Evolution 3, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0743-8.

Urzedo, D. I., Neilson, J., Fisher, R., Junqueira, R. G. P., 2020.A global production network for ecosystem services: The emergent governance of landscape restoration in the Brazilian Amazon. Global Environmental Change 61, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059.

USGS. The U.S. Geological Survey. (2013). Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System (LEDAPS) Algorithm Description Ed. Geological Survey Open-File Report. Disponível: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1057/ofr13 _1057.pdf. Acesso: 22 dez 2022.

USGS. The U.S. Geological Survey. (2018). Landsat Missions: Imaging the Earth Since. Ed. Landsat Missions Timeline. Disponível: https://www.usgs.gov/ landsat-missions/landsat-satellite-mission- s.pdf. Acesso: 22 dez 2022.

USGS. The U.S. Geological Survey. (2018). Landsat 8 (L8) Data Users Handbook. Ed. Geological Survey Open-File Report. South Dakota. Disponível: https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files/2512b7ec8c 34f3a7330 e7fa339792e5e.pdf. Acesso: 22 dez 2022.

Wills, A. R., Shirima, D. D., Villemaire-Côté, O., Platts, P. J., Knight, S. J., Loveridge, R., Seki, H., Waite, C. E., Munishi, P. K. T., Lyatuu, H., Bernal, B., Pfeifer, M., Marshall, A. R., 2023. A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1867, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0070.

Yude Pan, Birdsey, R. A., Phillips, O. L. 2024. New pathways for reducing global illegal logging,Forest Ecology and Management,Volume 568, 2024,122114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122114.

Zanin, P. R., Cavalcante, R. B. L., Fleischmann, A. S., Peres, C. A., Ferreira, D. M., Serrão, E. A. O., Pontes, P. R. M., 2024. Do protected areas enhance surface water quality across the Brazilian Amazon?, Journal for Nature Conservation, 81, 126684 – 126700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126684.