Adaptation of the lasater clinical judgment rubric to the brazilian culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v10i6a11262p4828-4836-2016Keywords:
Julgamento Clínico, Comparação transculturalAbstract
ABSTRACT
Objective: to adapt the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric to the Brazilian culture. Method: methodological study that used the model for transcultural adaptation by Beaton et al. The stability of the instrument in the Brazilian version was also tested (intra- and inter-observer agreement index). Results: the transcultural adaptation process was adequate to maintain the semantic, idiomatic, experiential and conceptual equivalences between the original rubric and the rubric adapted to the Brazilian culture, resulting in the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric – Brazilian Version. Intra- and inter-observer agreement data were considered acceptable. Conclusion: the research contributed to the provision of a culturally appropriate tool to characterize the clinical judgment aspects of Brazilian nursing students in a clinical simulation. Descriptors: Clinical Judgment; Patient Simulation; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Students, Nursing; Nursing.
RESUMO
Objetivo: adaptar à cultura brasileira o instrumento Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric. Método: estudo metodológico que utilizou o modelo de adaptação transcultural de Beaton e colaboradores. Ainda, testou-se a estabilidade do instrumento em versão brasileira (índice de concordância intra e interobservadores). Resultados: o processo de adaptação transcultural mostrou-se adequado para manter as equivalências semântica, idiomática, experiencial e conceitual entre o instrumento original e o instrumento adaptado à cultura brasileira, resultando na Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric – Brazilian Version. Os dados das concordâncias intra e interobservadores foram considerados aceitáveis. Conclusão: a pesquisa contribuiu para o desenvolvimento de instrumento culturalmente apropriado para caracterizar os aspectos do julgamento clínico de estudantes de enfermagem brasileiros em simulação clínica. Descritores: Julgamento Clínico; Simulação de Paciente; Comparação Transcultural; Estudantes de Enfermagem; Enfermagem.
RESUMEN
Objetivo: adaptar la Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric a la cultura brasileña. Método: estudio metodológico que utilizó el modelo de adaptación transcultural de Beaton y colaboradores. Además, la estabilidad del instrumento en su versión brasileña fue testada (índice de concordancia intra e interobservadores). Resultados: el proceso de adaptación transcultural se mostró adecuado para mantener las equivalencias semántica, idiomática, experiencial y conceptual, resultando en la Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric – Versión Brasileña. Los datos de las concordancias intra e interobservadores fueron considerados aceptables. Conclusión: la investigación contribuyó al desarrollo de un instrumento culturalmente apropiado para caracterizar los aspectos del juzgamiento clínico de estudiantes brasileños de enfermería en simulación clínica. Descriptores: Juicio Clínico; Simulación de Paciente; Comparación Transcultural; Estudiantes de Enfermería; Enfermería.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Nursing UFPE on line

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2025, authors retain the copyright to their works and grant the Revista de Enfermagem UFPE on line – REUOL the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). The Revista de Enfermagem UFPE on line – REUOL retains the copyright to works published in issues from 2007 to 2024 and grants the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) to this content in order to ensure Open Access.
Any user has the right to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you comply with the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.



















