Brazil of the few owners of great land extensions: an approach to feudal pedagogy between susreans and vassales, analogy metaphor or feudal elements?

Abstract

Human history has its processes and specificities in time and space, with certain ruptures and continuities of certain processes and elements. We can cite as an example: the types and modes of inequalities, slave systems and colonial systems, etc. But they are not the same or the same way. There are specificities and characteristics linked to contextual time and space. However, without a doubt, there are historical events and facts that occurwith certain similarities and characteristics between past and present, although within their respective contexts. Therefore, in each period and social, political, economic, cultural, religious, and historical context, we can observe certain similarities, between 'yesterday and today. 'For example, the Feudal System occurred in many continents and countries, and at specific times and with their specific contextual features. Thus, as already mentioned, it seems that certain elements or remnants of previous or past historical facts are evident in other times and contexts. Not that they are the same systems, nor their continuity, but only similarities and characteristics that seem to 'come and go'. Faced with these facts, their problems and consequences, we delve into sources on the European Feudal System from the 10th to the 14th century A.D. to understand elements, events and episodes that have been occurring in contemporary brazil, with some similarities to the feudal system. Fundamentally, with respect to land, large landowners, religion, politics, economics and rituals. Thus,we identify that: a) Religion, Politics and 'power', both infeudalism and in current political relations in Brazil,continue in the perspective of defending private property of large extensions of land in the hands of a few; b)maintain and reproduce the conservative and 'moralistic' ideas of the groups that hold 'political and economic power'; and c) naturalize poverty and misery of the population as fate or normal-natural, as well as attribute to the economic and material achievements of the large landowners something divine or determined.